Multi-attribute Auction Model for Agent-Based Content Trading in Telecom Markets

  • Ana Petric
  • Gordan Jezic
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6276)


The advent of the Internet and the development of the Next Generation Network (NGN) have enabled the development of value added services (VAS), while operators’ investments in licenses and their desire to stay competitive on the market have triggered the development. When forming VAS, special attention needs to be paid to the purchase of resources (e.g., transport capacity and content) needed for the service creation. As the number of participants on the telecom market increases, the need for automation of transactions carried between them arises. In this paper, we identify stakeholders on the telecom content e-market and propose an appropriate model which captures their transactions. Since content is not a commodity we propose a multi-attribute auction model for content trading which prevents sellers from manipulating the auction outcome by offering unnecessarily high values of some (often less important) attributes in order to compensate for unreasonably low values of other (more important) ones. A multi-agent system which uses the multi- attribute auction model as a negotiation protocol is presented and an illustrative example of content trading in telecom markets is provided.


Music Video Next Generation Network Reverse Auction Procurement Auction Telecom Operator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Olla, P., Patel, N.V.: A value chain model for mobile data service providers. Telecommunications Policy 26(9-10), 551–571 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Damsgaard, J., Marchegiani, L.: Like Rome, a mobile operator’s empire wasn’t built in a day!: a journey through the rise and fall of mobile network operators. In: Janssen, M., Sol, H.G., Wagenaar, R.W. (eds.) Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Electronic commerce, pp. 639–648. ACM, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Podobnik, V., Petric, A., Trzec, K., Jezic, G.: Software Agents in New Generation Networks: Towards the Automation of Telecom Processes. In: Jain, L.C., Nguyen, N.T. (eds.) Knowledge Processing and Decision Making in Agent-Based Systems, pp. 71–99. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Subramanya, S., Yi, B.K.: Utility Model for On-Demand Digital Content. Computer 38, 95–98 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mampaey, M., Ghys, F., Smouts, M., Vaaraniemi, A.: 3G Multimedia Network Services, Accounting, and User Profiles. Artech House, Inc., Boston (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Trzec, K., Lovrek, I., Mikac, B.: Agent Behaviour in Double Auction Electronic Market for Communication Resources. In: Gabrys, B., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4251, pp. 318–325. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Podobnik, V., Lovrek, I.: Multi-agent system for automation of B2C processes in the future Internet. In: Gracanin, D. (ed.) IEEE INFOCOM Workshops 2008, pp. 1–4 (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Phillipson, J.: Multimedia is a team sport. Ericsson Business Rewiev 3(1), 30–34 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    LeClerc, M.: Swimming with the sharks. Ericsson Business Rewiev 2(3), 18–22 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maes, P., Guttman, R.H., Moukas, A.: Agents That Buy and Sell. Communications of the ACM 42(3), 81–91 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fasli, M.: Agent Technology For E-Commerce. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Podobnik, V., Petric, A., Jezic, G.: An Agent-Based Solution for Dynamic Supply Chain Management. Journal of Universal Computer Science 14(7), 1080–1104 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    He, M., Jennings, N.R., Leung, H.F.: On Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 15(4), 985–1003 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gattiker, T.F., Huang, X., Schwarz, J.L.: Negotiation, email, and Internet reverse auctions: How sourcing mechanisms deployed by buyers affect suppliers’ trust. Journal of Operations Management 25(1), 184–202 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    He, S., Cattelan, R.G., Kirovski, D.: Modeling viral economies for digital media. In: Sventek, J.S., Hand, S. (eds.) 3rd ACM European Conference on Computer Systems – EuroSys 2008, pp. 149–162. ACM, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Angelov, S., Grefen, P.: The 4W framework for B2B e–contracting. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations 2(1), 78–97 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Krishna, P.R., Karlapalem, K.: Electronic Contracts. IEEE Internet Computing 12, 60–68 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Petric, A., Jezic, G.: Reputation Tracking Procurement Auctions. In: Nguyen, N.T., Kowalczyk, R., Chen, S.-M. (eds.) ICCCI 2009. LNCS, vol. 5796, pp. 825–837. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Do, V.T., Halatchev, M., Neumann, D.: A Context-Based Approach to Support Virtual Enterprises. In: Nguyen, N.T., Kowalczyk, R., Chen, S.M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 6, p. 6005. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2000)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bichler, M., Kalagnanam, J.: Configurable offers and winner determination in multi-attribute auctions. European Journal of Operational Research 160(2), 380–394 (2005)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bui, T., Yen, J., Hu, J., Sankaran, S.: A Multi-Attribute Negotiation Support System with Market Signaling for Electronic Markets. Group Decision and Negotiation 10(6), 515–537 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bichler, M.: An experimental analysis of multi-attribute auctions. Decision Support Systems 29(3), 249–268 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tong, H., Zhang, S.: A Fuzzy Multi-attribute Decision Making Algorithm for Web Services Selection Based on QoS. In: Yuan, H., Xu, Y. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Services Computing, pp. 51–57. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bellosta, M.J., Brigui, I., Kornman, S., Vanderpooten, D.: A multi-criteria model for electronic auctions. In: Haddad, H., Omicini, A., Wainwright, R.L., Liebrock, L.M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 759–765. ACM, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cheng, C.B.: Solving a sealed-bid reverse auction problem by multiple-criterion decision-making methods. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 56(12), 3261–3274 (2008)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana Petric
    • 1
  • Gordan Jezic
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Electrical Engineering and ComputingUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations