A Theoretical Framework to Foster Digital Literacy: The Case of Digital Learning Resources

  • Said Hadjerrouit
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 324)

Abstract

The New National Curriculum in Norway from 2006 recommends that teachers and students acquire a high degree of digital literacy in school education. One way to foster digital literacy is to train teachers to design and critically evaluate digital learning resources (DLRs). However, little research has been done as to which design principles and evaluation criteria are suitable for DLRs. This work proposes a theoretical framework, along with a case study, for designing and evaluating DLRs. The article draws on research in learning theory, pedagogical usability criteria, and context of use. The paper reports on the implications of the framework for the design and evaluation of DLRs.

Keywords

Digital literacy digital learning resources DLR learning theory pedagogical usability 
Download to read the full conference paper text

References

  1. 1.
    Bruillard, E.: From the Didactics of Computer Science towards the Didactics of Instrumental Activities with ICT. In: Second Greek Conference on Didactics of Informatics, Volos (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Drenoyianni, H.: Designing and Implementing a Project-Based ICT Course in a Teacher Education Setting: Rewards and Pitfalls. Education & Information Technologies 9(4), 387–404 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Krumsvik, R.: The Digital Challenges of School and Teacher Education in Norway: Some Urgent Questions and the Search for Answers. Education and Information Technologies 3&4(11), 239–256 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Markauskaite, L.: Exploring the Structure of Trainee Teachers’ ICT Literacy: The Main Components of and Relationships between, General Cognitive and Technical Capabilities. Education Tech. Research Dev. 55, 547–572 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kay, R., Knaak, L., Petrarca, D.: Exploring Teachers Perceptions of Web-Based Learning Tools. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects 5, 27–50 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Agostinho, S., Bennett, S., Lockyer, L., Harper, B.: Developing a Learning Object Metadata Application Profile Based on LOM Suitable for the Australian Higher Education Market. Australian Journal of Educational Technology 20(2), 191–208 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu, L., Johnson, D.L.: Web-Based Resources and Applications. Computer in the Schools 21(3), 131–147 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Norton, P., Hathaway, D.: On Its Way to K-12 Classrooms, Web 2.0 Goes to Graduate School. Computers in Schools 25(3), 163–180 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martinidale, T., Cates, W.M., Qian, Y.: Analysis of Recognized Web-Based Educational Resources. Computers in the Schools 21(3), 101–117 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Strijker, A., Collis, B.: The Influence of Context on the Future of Learning Objects. In: Hartman, K., Koohang, A. (eds.) Learning Objects: Theory, Praxis, Issues, and Trends, pp. 83–112. Informing Science Press, Santa Rosa (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nam, C.S., Tonya, L., Smith-Jackson, T.L.: Web-Based Learning Environment: A Theory-Based Design Process for Development and Evaluation. Journal of Information Technology Education 6, 23–44 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nielsen, J.: Designing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity. New Riders Publishing, Indianapolis (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Academic Press, Boston (1993)MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kukulska-Hulme, A., Shield, L.: Usability and Pedagogical Design: Are Language Learning Web Sites Special? In: Cantoni, L., McLoughlin, C. (eds.) Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2004, Chesapeake, VA, USA, pp. 4235–4242 (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Laurillard, D.: Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies, 2nd edn. Routledge, London (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leacock, T.L., Nesbit, J.C.: A Framework for the Quality of Multimedia Resources. Educational Technology & Society 10(2), 44–59 (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nokelainen, P.: An Empirical Assessment of Pedagogical Usability Criteria for Digital Learning Material with Elementary School Students. Educational Technology & Society 9(2), 178–197 (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    John, P., Sutherland, R.: Teaching and Learning with ICT: New Technology, New Pedagogy? Education, Communication & Information 4(1), 101–107 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maddux, C.D.: The Web in K-12 Education. Computers in the Schools 21(3), 149–165 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jimoyiannis, A., Komis, V.: Examining Teachers’ Beliefs about ICT in Education: Implications of a Teacher Preparation Programme. Teacher Development 11(2), 149–173 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Squires, D., Preece, J.: Predicting Quality in Educational Software: Evaluating for Learning, Usability and the Synergy between Them. Interacting with Computers 11, 467–483 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    ITU Monitor: The Digital State of Affairs in Norwegian schools (2009), http://www.itu.no/ITU+Monitor.9UFRDSXH.ips
  23. 23.
    Simbulan, M.S.: Learning Objects’ User Interface. In: Hartman, K., Koohang, A. (eds.) Learning Objects: Applications, Implications, & Future Directions, pp. 259–336. Informing Science Press, Santa Rosa (2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peterson, D.: Usability Theory, Practice and Evaluation for Learning Objects. In: Hartman, K., Koohang, A. (eds.) Learning Objects: Applications, Implications, & Future Directions, pp. 337–370. Informing Science Press, Santa Rosa (2007)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sedig, K., Klawe, M., Westrom, M.: Role of Interface Manipulation Style and Scaffolding on Cognition and Concept Learning in Learnware. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 8(1), 34–59 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Elliott, G.J., Jones, E., Barker, P.: A Grounded Approach to Modeling Learnability of Hypermedia Authoring Tools. Interacting with Computers 14, 547–574 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lin, B., Hsieh, C.: Web-Based Teaching and Learner Control: A Research Review. Computers & Education 37(3-4), 377–386 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Karagiorgi, Y., Symeou, L.: Translating Constructivism into Instructional Design: Potential and Limitations. Educational Technology & Society 8(1), 17–27 (2005)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Brousseau, G.: Theory of Didactical Situations. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London (1998)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Piaget, G.: Genetic Epistemology. Basic Books, New York (1971)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vygotsky, L.S.: Thought and Language. In: Translated by Kozulin, A. (ed.) MIT Press, Cambridge (1986) (Original English translation published 1962)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tondeur, J., Van Keer, H., Van Braak, H., Valcke, M.: ICT Integration in the Classroom: Challenging the Potential of a School Policy. Computers & Education 51, 212–223 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Guelbahar, Y.: Technology Planning: A Roadmap to Successful Technology Integration in Schools. Computers & Education 49, 943–956 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hadjihoma, C., Karagiorgi, Y.: The Use of ICT in Primary Schools within Emerging Communities of Implementation. Computers & Education 52, 83–91 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hayes, D.N.A.: ICT and Learning: Lessons from Australian Classrooms. Computers & Education 49, 385–395 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Teartle, P.: A Theoretical and Instrumental Framework for Implementing Change in ICT in Education. Cambridge Journal of Education 34(3), 331–351 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gadanidis, G., Schindler, K.: Learning Objects, Type II Applications, and Embedded Pedagogical Models. Computers in the Schools 21(1), 19–32 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Li, H., Sun, X., Zhang, K.: Culture-Centered Design: Cultural Factors in Interface Usability and Usability Tests. In: Eighth ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking, and Parallel/Distributed Computing, SNPD 2007, pp. 1084–1088 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Said Hadjerrouit
    • 1
  1. 1.University of AgderKristiansandNorway

Personalised recommendations