Advertisement

Getting Granular on Twitter: Tweets from a Conference and Their Limited Usefulness for Non-participants

  • Martin Ebner
  • Herbert Mühlburger
  • Sandra Schaffert
  • Mandy Schiefner
  • Wolfgang Reinhardt
  • Steve Wheeler
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 324)

Abstract

The use of microblogging applications (especially Twitter) is becoming increasingly commonplace in a variety of settings. Today, active conference participants can post messages on microblogging platforms to exchange information quickly and in real-time. Recent research work was based on quantitative analyses in terms of the number of tweets or active Twitter users within a specific time period. In this paper, we examine the content of the contributions and aim to analyze how useful posts are for the “listening” Internet auditorium. It can be shown that only a few microblogs are of interest for non-participants of the specific event and that meaningful usage of a microblogging application requires greater care than previously anticipated.

Keywords

Twitter microblogging conference analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Ebner, M., Schiefner, M.: Microblogging - more than fun? In: Proceedings of IADIS Mobile Learning Conference, Portugal, pp. 155–159 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ebner, M., Lienhardt, C., Rohs, M., Meyer, I.: Microblogs in higher education – a chance to facilitate informal and process oriented learning? Computers & Education 55(1), 92–100 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Costa, C., Beham, G., Reinhardt, W., Sillaots, M.: Microblogging in Technology Enhanced Learning: A Use-Case Inspection of PPE Summer School 2008. In: Proceedings of the 2nd SIRTEL Workshop on Social Information Retrieval for Technology Enhanced Learning (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grosseck, G., Holotescu, C.: Can we use twitter for educational activities? In: Proceedings of the 4th International Scientific Conference eLSE “eLearning and Software for Education” (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Letierce, J., Passant, A., Decker, S., Breslin, J.: Understanding how Twitter is used to spread scientific messages. In: Web Science Conference, Raleigh, NC, USA (2010), http://journal.webscience.org/314/ (last visited April 2010)
  6. 6.
    Haewoon, K., Changhyun, L., Hosung, P., Moon, S.: What is Twitter a Social Network or a News Media? In: Proceedings of the 19th International World Wide Web (WWW) Conference, Raleigh, NC (USA), April 26-30 (2010), http://an.kaist.ac.kr/traces/WWW2010.html (last visited April 2010)
  7. 7.
    Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., Tseng, B.: Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In: Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 Workshop on Web Mining and Social Network Analysis, pp. 56–65. ACM, New York (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    boyd, d., Golder, S., Lotan, G.: Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on twitter. In: Proceedings of the HICSS-43 Conference (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ebner, M.: Introducing Live Microblogging: How Single Presentations Can Be Enhanced by the Mass. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching (JRIT) 2(1), 91–100 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ebner, M., Reinhardt, W.: Social networking in scientific conferences – Twitter as tool for strengthen a scientific community. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Science 2.0 for TEL (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reinhardt, W., Ebner, M., Beham, G., Costa, C.: How people are using Twitter during Conferences. In: Hornung-Prähauser, V., Luckmann, M. (eds.) Creativity and Innovation Competencies on the Web. Proceedings of the 5th EduMedia 2009, Salzburg, pp. 145–156 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    boyd, d.: Spectacle of Web 2.0 Expo ... from my perspective (2009), http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2009/11/24/spectacle_at_we.html (last visited April 2010)
  13. 13.
    Bernhardt, T., Kirchner, M.: Web 2.0 meets conference – the EduCamp as a new format of participation and exchange in the world of education. In: Ebner, M., Schiefner, M. (eds.) Looking Toward the Future of Technology-Enhanced Education: Ubiquitous Learning and the Digital Native, pp. 192–204. IGI Global, Hershey (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reinhardt, W.: Visualizing the dynamics of communication of Communities of Practice on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Building Technology Enhanced Learning solutions for Communities of Practice (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wille, R.: Formal Concept Analysis as Mathematical Theory of Concepts and Concept Hierarchies. In: Ganter, B., Stumme, G., Wille, R. (eds.) Formal Concept Analysis. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3626, pp. 1–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ganter, B., Wille, R.: Formal concept analysis: Mathematical foundations. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ross, C., Terras, M., Warwick, C., Welsh, A.: Enabled Backchannel: Conference Twitter Use by Digital Humanists, Department of Information Studies, draft version (2009), http://www.ucl.ac.uk/infostudies/claire-ross/Digitally_Enabled_Backchannel.pdf (last visited April 2010)

Copyright information

© IFIP 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Ebner
    • 1
  • Herbert Mühlburger
    • 1
  • Sandra Schaffert
    • 2
  • Mandy Schiefner
    • 3
  • Wolfgang Reinhardt
    • 4
  • Steve Wheeler
    • 5
  1. 1.Social Learning, Computer and Information ServicesGraz University of TechnologyAustria
  2. 2.Salzburg Research ForschungsgesellschaftAustria
  3. 3.Center for University Teaching and LearningUniversity of ZurichSwitzerland
  4. 4.Computer Science Education GroupUniversity of PaderbornGermany
  5. 5.University of PlymouthUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations