Advertisement

Towards a Usability Coaching Method for Institutionalizing Usability in Organisations

  • Åsa Cajander
  • Elina Eriksson
  • Jan Gulliksen
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 332)

Abstract

The ideas related to user centred systems design are difficult to implement in organisations and usability is given low priority in in-house systems development. This problem is multifaceted and complex and needs to be addressed with a method capable of adapting to situations, people and context. In this paper we outline a new method – usability coaching – that has the capability for dealing with the situated problems of introducing user centred systems development in an organisations. The method is the results of a larger action research case study in which 9 individuals in an organization received usability coaching. Our study indicates that the coaching program made coachees work more actively with usability activities; hence the coaching program had a substantial effect on their actions and contributed to the organizational change.

Keywords

Coaching user centred-systems design organizational change usability action research qualitative research learning theories conceptual change and threshold concept 

References

  1. 1.
    Gulliksen, J., et al.: Key principles for user-centred systems design. Behaviour & Information Technology 22(6), 397–409 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gulliksen, J., et al.: User-Centred Systems Design as Organizational Change: A Longitudinal Action Research Project to Improve Usability and the Computerized Work Environment in a Public Authority. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction 5(3), 13–53 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cajander, Å.: Values and Perspectives Affecting IT Systems Development and Usability Work, Department of Information Technology. Uppsala University, Uppsala (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cajander, Å., Gulliksen, J., Boivie, I.: Management perspectives on usability in a public authority: a case study. In: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Changing Roles, pp. 38–47 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sandblad, B., et al.: Work environment and computer systems development. Behaviour and Information Technology - BIT 22(6), 375–387 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Greenbaum, J., Kyng, M. (eds.): Design at work: cooperative design of computer systems. ed. G. Joan and K. Morten, p. 294. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah (1992)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kammersgaard, J.: Four Different Perspectives on Human Computer Interaction. In: Preece, J., Keller, L. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction. Prentice-Hall, Cambridge (1990)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gulliksen, J., et al.: Making a difference: a survey of the usability profession in Sweden. In: Proceedings of the Third Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Tampere, Finland. ACM Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boivie, I.: A Fine Balance: Addressing Usability and Users? In: Needs in the Development of IT Systems for the Workplace, p. 85. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Uppsala (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Orlikowski, W.J., Gash, D.C.: Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 12(2), 174–207 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rasmussen, L.B.: Action research—Scandinavian experiences. AI & Society 18(1), 21–43 (2004)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McKay, J., Marschall, P.: The Dual Imperatives of Action Research. Information Technology & People 14(1), 45–59 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gulliksen, J., et al.: A longitudinal action research case on the introduction of usability and user-centred design into a public authority. The International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, IJTHI (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cajander, Å.: Usability Mentoring - An Exploratory Study. In: INTERACT 2007. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Garvey, R., Stokes, P., Megginson, D.: Coaching and Mentoring: Theory and Practice. Sage Publilcations Ltd., Thousand Oaks (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mertz, N.T.: What’s a Mentor, Anyway? Educational Administration Quarterly 40(4), 541 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hartfield, B., Winograd, T., Bennett, J.: Learning HCI design: Mentoring project groups in a course on human-computer interaction. SIGCSE Bulletin (Association for Computing Machinery, Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education) 24(1), 246–251 (1992)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Allen, T.D., Eby, L.T.: Relationship Effectiveness for Mentors: Factors Associated with Learning and Quality. Journal of Management 29(4), 469 (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wanberg, C.R., Welsh, E.T., Hezlett, S.A.: Mentoring research: A review and dynamic process model. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management 22, 39–124 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aryee, S., Lo, S., Kang, I.L.: Antecedents of early career stage mentoring among Chinese employees. Journal of Organizational Behavior 20(5), 563–576 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Colarelli, S.M., Bishop, R.C.: Career commitment: Functions, correlates, and management. Group & Organization Management 15(2), 158 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kram, K.E.: Phases of the Mentor Relationship. The Academy of Management Journal 26(4), 608–625 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schön, D.A.: Educating the reflective practitioner (toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions). Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1987)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rittel, H.W.J., Webber, M.M.: Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4(2), 155–169 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gullliksen, J., et al.: A longitudinal action research case on the introduction of usability and user-centred design into a public authority. The International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, IJTHI (2009)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kavathatzopoulos, I.: AvI-enkäten: Ett verktyg för att mäta användbarhet, stress och nytta av IT-stöd, It Department. Uppsala University (2007)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Johansson, N., et al.: A participatory Process Supporting Design of Future Work. In: Singh, S.K. (ed.) Ergonomics: An Introduction. Icfai University Press, India (2007)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Eriksson, E., Cajander, Å., Gulliksen, J.: Hello World! - System Developers Doing Field Studies. In: INTERACT 2009, Uppsala, Sweden (2009)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Posner, G.J., et al.: Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education 66(2), 211–227 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Entwistle, N.: Conceptions of learning and the experience of understanding: thresholds, contextual influences, and knowledge objects. In: Re-framing the Conceptual Change Approach in Learning and Instruction, p. 123 (2007)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Meyer, J.H.F., Land, R.: Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. Routledge, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Entwistle, N.: Threshold Concepts and Transformative Ways of Thinking Within Research into Higher Education. In: Meyer, J.H.F., Land, R. (eds.) Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge: Linkages to Ways of Thinking and Practising within the Disciplines (2003)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Meyer, J.H.F., Land, R.: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines. Occasional Report, 4 (2008)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nørgaard, M.: Understanding Usability Work as a Human Activity. Københavns Universitet, Det Naturvidenskabelige Fakultet, Datalogisk Institut, Copenhaguen (2008)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schön, D.: The Reflective Practitioner - How Professionals Think in Action. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot (1983)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Allen, T.D., Poteet, M.L.: Developing effective mentoring relationships: Strategies from the mentor’s viewpoint. Career Development Quarterly 48(1), 59–73 (1999)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Allen, T.D., Poteet, M.L., Burroughs, S.M.: The mentor’s perspective: A qualitative inquiry and future research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior 51(1), 70–89 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    McDonald, K.S., Hite, L.M.: Ethical Issues in Mentoring: The Role of HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources 7(4), 569 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Åsa Cajander
    • 1
  • Elina Eriksson
    • 2
  • Jan Gulliksen
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. Of IT/HCIUppsala universityUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.KTH (Royal Institute of Technology)StockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations