Advertisement

Reputation as Aggregated Opinions

  • John Debenham
  • Carles Sierra
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 61)

Abstract

A model of reputation is presented in which agents share and aggregate their opinions, and observe the way in which their opinions effect the opinions of others. A method is proposed that supports the deliberative process of combining opinions into a group’s reputation. The reliability of agents as opinion givers are measured in terms of the extent to which their opinions differ from that of the group reputation. These reliability measures are used to form an a priori reputation estimate given the individual opinions of a set of independent agents.

Keywords

Maximum Entropy Multiagent System Social Evaluation Semantic Distance Epistemic Belief 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sierra, C., Debenham, J.: Information-based agency. In: Proceedings of Twentieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence IJCAI-07, Hyderabad, India, January 2007, pp. 1513–1518 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Friedkin, N., Johnsen, E.: Social influence networks and opinion change. Advances in Group Processes 16, 1–29 (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Surowiecki, J.: The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies and Nations. Random House, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sabater, J., Sierra, C.: Review on computational trust and reputation models. Artificial Intelligence Review 24(1), 33–60 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Viljanen, L.: Towards an ontology of trust. In: Katsikas, S., Løpez, J., Pernum, G. (eds.) TrustBus 2005. LNCS, vol. 3592, pp. 175–184. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huynh, T., Jennings, N., Shadbolt, N.: An integrated trust and reputation model for open multi-agent systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 13(2), 119–154 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arcos, J.L., Esteva, M., Noriega, P., Rodríguez, J.A., Sierra, C.: Environment engineering for multiagent systems. Journal on Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 18 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sierra, C., Debenham, J.: Information-based agency. In: Veloso, M. (ed.) Twentieth International Joint Conference on AI (January 2007) (in press)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sierra, C., Debenham, J.: The LOGIC Negotiation Model. In: Proceedings Sixth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems AAMAS-2007, Honolulu, Hawai’i, May 2007, pp. 1026–1033 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Klimek, P., Lambiotte, R., Thurner, S.: Opinion formation in laggard societies. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 82(2) (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cheeseman, P., Stutz, J.: On The Relationship between Bayesian and Maximum Entropy Inference. In: Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering. American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY, USA, pp. 445–461 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Paris, J.: Common sense and maximum entropy. Synthese 117(1), 75–93 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kuter, U., Golbeck, J.: Sunny: A new algorithm for trust inference in social networks using probabilistic confidence models. In: Proceedings of the 22nd national conference on Artificial intelligence (AAAI’07), pp. 1377–1382. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peleg, S., Werman, M., Rom, H.: A unified approach to the change of resolution: Space and gray-level. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 11(7), 739–742 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yager, R.R.: On the determination of strength of belief for decision support under uncertainty — part i: generating strengths of belief. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 142(1), 117–128 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pinyol, I., Sabater-Mir, J., Cuní, G.: How to talk about reputation using a common ontology: From definition to implementation, pp. 90–101 (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jelasity, M., Montresor, A., Babaoglu, O.: Gossip-based aggregation in large dynamic networks. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems 23(3), 219–252 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Debenham
    • 1
  • Carles Sierra
    • 2
  1. 1.QCISUniversity of TechnologySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Institut d’Investigació en Intel·ligència Artificial - IIIASpanish Scientific Research Council, CSICBellaterraSpain

Personalised recommendations