Advertisement

Process Views to Support Compliance Management in Business Processes

  • David Schumm
  • Frank Leymann
  • Alexander Streule
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 61)

Abstract

Compliance has become an important driver in business process management, as it requires profound and traceable changes of the processes. Besides the increasing demand for security, privacy and trust, compliance also needs consistent integration and management of process structures related to compliance. We use the notion of compliance fragments to refer to such structures. In this paper, we discuss the challenges of managing compliance fragments in business processes. Extraction, integration, highlighting and hiding of compliance fragments represent the challenges we refer to. For extraction and hiding of compliance fragments we present an implementation for the process execution language BPEL, based on process view transformation concepts.

Keywords

Process View Model Transformation Compliance Fragment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Avrilionis, D., Cunin, P.Y., Fernström, C.: OPSIS: a View Mechanism for Software Processes which Supports their Evolution and Reuse. In: Proc. of the 18th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1996)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Caprasse, D., Laurent, J., Reed, W.: Three Lines of Defence: How to take the Burden out of Compliance. In: European Insurance Digest (April 2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daniel, F., Casati, F., D’Andrea, V., Strauch, S., Schumm, D., Leymann, F., Mulo, E., Zdun, U., Dustdar, S., Sebahi, S., de Marchi, F., Hacid, M.S.: Business Compliance Governance in Service-Oriented Architectures. In: Proc. of the 23rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA). IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eclipse BPEL Project. Eclipse BPEL Designer (2010), http://www.eclipse.org/bpel/
  5. 5.
    Eshuis, R., Grefen, P.: Constructing Customized Process Views. Data & Knowledge Engineering 64(2), 419–438 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Object Management Group (OMG). Business Process Modeling Notation Version 1.2. OMG Standard (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS). Web Services Business Process Execution Language Version 2.0. OASIS Standard (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rinderle, S., Bobrik, R., Reichert, M., Bauer, T.: Business Process Visualization – Use Cases, Challenges, Solutions. In: Proc. of the International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS), pp. 204–211. INSTICC Press (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schumm, D., Karastoyanova, D., Leymann, F., Nitzsche, J.: On Visualizing and Modelling BPEL with BPMN. In: Grid and Pervasive Computing Workshops: 4th International Workshop on Workflow Management (ICWM). IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Streule, A.: Abstract Views on BPEL Processes. Diploma thesis no. 2889, Universität Stuttgart, Fakultät Informatik, Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (2009), ftp://ftp.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/pub/library/medoc.ustuttgart_fi/DIP-2889/DIP-2889.pdf
  11. 11.
    Schumm, D., Leymann, F., Ma, Z., Scheibler, T., Strauch, S.: Integrating Compliance into Business Processes: Process Fragments as Reusable Compliance Controls. In: Proc. of the Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik, MKWI’10 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schumm, D., Leymann, F., Streule, A.: Process Viewing Patterns. Accepted for publication at the 14th IEEE International EDOC Conference (EDOC 2010). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fragmento - Fragment-oriented Repository. Online Documentation (2010), http://www.iaas.uni-stuttgart.de/forschung/projects/fragmento/start.htm
  14. 14.
    Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: A Revised Framework (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sackmann, S., Kähmer, M.: ExPDT: A Policy-based Approach for Automating Compliance. In: Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI), Gabler, vol. 50(5), pp. 366–374 (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ma, Z., Lu, W., Leymann, F.: Query Structural Information of BPEL Processes. In: Proc. of the 4th International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services, ICIW (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schumm, D., Turetken, O., Kokash, N., Elgammal, A., Leymann, F., Heuvel, W.v.d.: Business Process Compliance through Reusable Units of Compliant Processes. In: Accepted for Publication at the 1st Workshop on Engineering SOA and the Web (ESW’10), Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Schumm
    • 1
  • Frank Leymann
    • 1
  • Alexander Streule
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Architecture of Application SystemsUniversity of StuttgartStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations