Advertisement

The Indiana Experiment: Investigating the Role of Anticipation and Attention in a Dynamic Environment

  • Birger Johansson
  • Christian Balkenius
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6226)

Abstract

We investigating the role of anticipation and attention in a dynamic environment in a number of large scale simulations of an agent that tries to negotiate a number of gates that continuously open and close. In particular we have looked at learning mechanisms that can predict the future positions of the gates and control strategies that will allow the agent to pass through the gates unharmed. The simulations reported below use the AARC architecture [1]. This architecture combines a large number of different cognitive mechanisms. In Experiment 1, the task for the agent is to pass through a single gate and in Experiment 2, to pass through three successive gates. The results shows that the AARC architecture is flexible enough to handle very diverse situations. It is also somewhat surprising that linear predictors are sufficient in most cases.

Keywords

Safety Margin Trial Time Dynamic Object Local Goal Valid Trial 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Johansson, B.: Anticipation and Attention in Robot Control. PhD thesis, Lund University (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ball, D., Wyeth, G.: Modeling and exploiting behavior patterns in dynamic environments. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference Intelligent on Robots and Systems, vol. 2, pp. 1371–1376 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barakova, E.: Prediction of rapidly changing environmental dynamics for real time behavior adaptation using visual information. In: Würtz, L.M. (ed.) Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Dynamic Perception, Bochum, Germany, pp. 147–152. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sharifi, M., Mousavian, H., Aavani, A.: Predicting the future state of the robocup simulation environment: heuristic and neural networks approaches. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp. 32–37. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Veloso, M., Stone, P., Bowling, M.: Anticipation as a key for collaboration in a team of agents: A case study in robotic soccer. In: Schenker, P.S., McKee, G.T. (eds.) Proceedings of SPIE Sensor Fusion and Decentralized Control in Robotic Systems II, Bellingham, vol. 3839, pp. 134–143 (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ding, Z., Hong, L.: An interacting multiple model algorithm with a switching markov chain. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 25(1), 1–9 (1997)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Efe, M., Atherton, D.P.: Maneuvering target tracking with an adaptive kalman filter. In: Proceedings of the 37th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, vol. 1 (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bando, T., Shibata, T., Doya, K., Ishii, S.: Switching particle filters for efficient visual tracking. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 54(10), 873–884 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bar-Shalom, Y.: Recursive tracking algorithms: from the kalman filter to intelligent trackers for cluttered environment. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Control and Applications, ICCON 1989, pp. 675–680 (1989)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morelande, M.R., Challa, S.: Manoeuvring target tracking in clutter using particle filters. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 41(1), 252–270 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johansson, B., Balkenius, C.: An experimental study of anticipation in simple robot navigation. In: Butz, M.V., Sigaud, O., Pezzulo, G., Baldassarre, G. (eds.) ABiALS 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4520, pp. 365–378. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johansson, B., Balkenius, C.: Prediction time in anticipatory systems. In: Pezzulo, G., Butz, M.V., Sigaud, O., Baldassarre, G. (eds.) ABiALS 2008, vol. 5499, pp. 283–300. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Balkenius, C., Morén, J., Johansson, B., Johnsson, M.: Ikaros: Building cognitive models for robots. Advanced Engineering Informatics 24(1), 40–48 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., Stork, D.G.: Pattern Classification, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York (2001)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Johansson, B., Balkenius, C.: Learning to anticipate the movements of intermittently occluded objects. In: Schlesinger, M., Berthouze, L., Balkenius, C. (eds.) Eighth International Conference on Epigenetic Robotics, Lund University Cognitive Studies, vol. 139 (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Prem, E., Hörtnagl, E., Dorffner, G.: Growing event memories for autonomous robots. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Growing Artifacts that Live: Basic Principles and Future Trends (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Laird, J.E.: It knows what you’re going to do: Adding anticipation to a quakebot. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Canada, pp. 385–392. ACM Press, New York (May 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Birger Johansson
    • 1
  • Christian Balkenius
    • 2
  1. 1.University of TechnologySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Cognitive ScienceLund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations