Dynamic Adaptive Service Architecture – Towards Coordinated Service Composition

  • Claus Pahl
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6285)


With software services becoming a strategic capability for the software sector, software architecture needs to address integration problems to help services to collaborate and coordinate their activities. The increasing need to address dynamic and automated changes can be answered by a service coordination architecture with event-based collaboration that enables dynamic and adaptive architectures. Intelligent service and process identification and adaptation techniques are suitable solutions for event-driven and on-demand service architectures. We define an architectural solution space and identify research challenges.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Balzarotti, D., Costa, P., Picco, G.P.: The LighTS tuple space framework and its customization for context-aware applications. Web Intelligence and Agent Systems 5(2), 215–231 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Doberkat, E.-E., Franke, W., Gutenbeil, U., Hasselbring, W., Lammers, U., Pahl, C.: PROSET - Prototyping with Sets, Language Definition. Software-Engineering Memo 15, Universitt GH Essen (1992)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gacitua-Decar, V., Pahl, C.: Automatic Business Process Pattern Matching for Enterprise Services Design. In: 4th International Workshop on Service- and Process-Oriented Software Engineering (SOPOSE 2009). IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hayes, B.: Cloud computing. Communications of the ACM 51(7), 9–11 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johanson, B., Fox, A.: Extending Tuplespaces for Coordination in Interactive Workspaces. Journal of Systems and Software 69(3), 243–266 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nixon, L., Antonechko, O., Tolksdorf, R.: Towards semantic tuplespace computing: the semantic web spaces system. In: Symp. on Appl. Computing, SAC 2007 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Papazoglou, M.P., Traverso, P., Dustdar, S., Leymann, F.: Service-Oriented Computing: State of the Art and Research Challenges. Computer, 38–45 (November 2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rao, J., Su, X.: A Survey of Automated Web Service Composition Methods. In: Cardoso, J., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) SWSWPC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3387, pp. 43–54. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Utschig-Utschig, C.: Architecting Event-Driven SOA: A Primer. Oracle (2008),
  10. 10.
    Wang, M., Yapa Bandara, K., Pahl, C.: Integrated Constraint Violation Handling for Dynamic Service Composition. In: IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, SCC 2009. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claus Pahl
    • 1
  1. 1.School of ComputingDublin City UniversityDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations