Advertisement

Combinatorial 2D Vector Field Topology Extraction and Simplification

  • Jan Reininghaus
  • Ingrid Hotz
Chapter
Part of the Mathematics and Visualization book series (MATHVISUAL)

Summary

This paper investigates a combinatorial approach to vector field topology. The theoretical basis is given by Robin Forman’s work on a combinatorial Morse theory for dynamical systems defined on general simplicial complexes. We formulateForman’s theory in a graph theoretic setting and provide a simple algorithm for the construction and topological simplification of combinatorial vector fields on 2D manifolds. Given a combinatorial vector field we are able to extract its topological skeleton including allperiodic orbits. Due to the solid theoretical foundation we know that the resulting structure is always topologically consistent. We explore the applicability and limitations of this combinatorial approach with several examples and determine its robustness with respect to noise.

Keywords

Periodic Orbit Simplicial Graph Morse Theory Singular Homology Morse Decomposition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank David Günther and Tino Weinkauf for many fruitful discussions on this topic and Christian Löwen for his great implementational efforts. This work was funded by the DFG Emmy-Noether research programm. All visualizations in this paper have been created using AMIRA - a system for advanced visual data analysis (see http://amira.zib.de/).

References

  1. 1.
    G. Chen, K. Mischaikow, R.S. Laramee, P. Pilarczyk, and E. Zhang. Vector field editing andperiodic orbit extraction using morse decomposition. IEEE Transactions in Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13:769–785, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Herbert Edelsbrunner and J. Harer. Persistent homology — a survey. In J. E. Goodman, J. Pach, and R. Pollack, editors, Surveys on Discrete and Computational Geometry: Twenty Years Later, volume 458, pages 257–282. AMS Bookstore, 2008.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Herbert Edelsbrunner, John Harer, Vijay Natarajan, and Valerio Pascucci. Morse-smale complexes forpiecewise linear 3-manifolds. In SCG ’03: Proceedings of the nineteenth annual symposium on Computational geometry, pages 361–370, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Robin Forman. Combinatorial vector fields and dynamical systems. Mathematische Zeitschrift, 228:629–681, 1998.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Robin Forman. Morse theory for cell complexes. Advances in Mathematics, 134:90–145, 1998.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Robin Forman. A user’s guide to discrete morse theory. In Proceedings of the 2001 Internat. Conf. on Formal Power Series and Algebraic Combinatorics, Advances in Applied Mathematics, 2001.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Attila Gyulassy, Vijay Natarajan, Valerio Pascucci, Peer-Timo Bremer, and Bernd Hamann. A topological approach to simplification of three-dimensional scalar functions. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12(4):474–484, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Helman and L. Hesselink. Representation and display of vector field topology in fluid flow data sets. Computer, 22(8):27–36, August 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thomas Klein and Thomas Ertl. Scale-space tracking of critical points in 3d vector fields. In Hans Hagen Helwig Hauser and Holger Theisel, editors, Topology-based Methods in Visualization, Mathematics and Visualization, pages 35–49. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, May 2007.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Robert S. Laramee, Helwig Hauser, Lingxiao Zhao, and Frits H. Post. Topology-based flow visualization, the state of the art. In Hans Hagen Helwig Hauser and Holger Theisel, editors, Topology-based Methods in Visualization, Mathematics and Visualization, pages 1–19. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, May 2007.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thomas Lewiner. Geometric discrete Morse complexes. PhD thesis, Department of Mathematics, PUC-Rio, 2005. Advised by Hlio Lopes and Geovan Tavares.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thomas Lewiner, Helio Lopes, and Geovan Tavares. Applications of forman’s discrete morse theory to topology visualization and mesh compression. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 10(5):499–508, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J.J. Sanchez-Gabites. Dynamical systems and shapes. RACSAM: Geometry and Topology, 102:127–159, 2008.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alexander Schrijver. Combinatorial Optimization. Springer, 2003.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Holger Theisel, Tino Weinkauf, Hans-Christian Hege, and Hans-Peter Seidel. Grid-independent detection of closed stream lines in 2d vector fields. In Proceedings of the VMV Conference 2004, page 665, Stanford, USA, November 2004.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xavier Tricoche, Gerik Scheuermann, and Hans Hagen. Continuous topology simplification of planar vector fields. In VIS ’01: Proceedings of the conference on Visualization ’01, pages 159–166, Washington, DC, USA, 2001. IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xavier Tricoche, Gerik Scheuermann, Hans Hagen, and Stefan Clauss. Vector and tensor field topology simplification on irregular grids. In D. Ebert, J. M. Favre, and R. Peikert, editors, VisSym ’01: Proceedings of the symposium on Data Visualization 2001, pages 107–116, Wien, Austria, May 28–30 2001. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tino Weinkauf, Holger Theisel, K. Shi, Hans-Christian Hege, and Hans-Peter Seidel. Extracting higher order critical points and topological simplification of 3D vector fields. In Proc. IEEE Visualization 2005, pages 559–566, Minneapolis, U.S.A., October 2005.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thomas Wischgoll and Gerik Scheuermann. Detection and visualization of closed streamlines in planar flows. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 7(2):165–172, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zuse Institute Berlin (ZIB)BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations