A Psychophysical Evaluation of Texture Degradation Descriptors

  • Jiří Filip
  • Pavel Vácha
  • Michal Haindl
  • Patrick R. Green
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6218)


Delivering digitally a realistic appearance of materials is one of the most difficult tasks of computer vision. Accurate representation of surface texture can be obtained by means of view- and illumination-dependent textures. However, this kind of appearance representation produces massive datasets so their compression is inevitable. For optimal visual performance of compression methods, their parameters should be tuned to a specific material. We propose a set of statistical descriptors motivated by textural features, and psychophysically evaluate their performance on three subtle artificial degradations of textures appearance. We tested five types of descriptors on five different textures and combination of thirteen surface shapes and two illuminations. We found that descriptors based on a two-dimensional causal auto-regressive model, have the highest correlation with the psychophysical results, and so can be used for automatic detection of subtle changes in rendered textured surfaces in accordance with human vision.


texture degradation statistical features BTF eye-tracking visual psychophysics 


  1. 1.
    Dana, K., van Ginneken, B., Nayar, S., Koenderink, J.: Reflectance and texture of real-world surfaces. ACM Transactions on Graphics 18(1), 1–34 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Filip, J., Haindl, M.: Bidirectional texture function modeling: A state of the art survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 31(11), 1921–1940 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Filip, J., Chantler, M., Green, P., Haindl, M.: A psychophysically validated metric for bidirectional texture data reduction. ACM Transactions on Graphics 27(5), 138 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guthe, M., Müller, G., Schneider, M., Klein, R.: BTF-CIELab: A perceptual difference measure for quality assessment and compression of BTFs. Comput. Graph. Forum 28(1), 101–113 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Filip, J., Chantler, M., Haindl, M.: On uniform resampling and gaze analysis of bidirectional texture functions. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 6(3), 15 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Database BTF, Bonn (2003),
  7. 7.
    Mantiuk, R., Myszkowski, K., Seidel, H.P.: Visible difference predictor for high dynamic range images. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, October 2004, vol. 3, pp. 2763–2769. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang, Z., Bovik, A., Sheikh, H., Simoncelli, E.: Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 13(4), 600–612 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Haindl, M., Šimberová, S.: A Multispectral Image Line Reconstruction Method. In: Theory & Applications of Image Analysis, pp. 306–315. World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore (1992)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vacha, P., Haindl, M.: Image retrieval measures based on illumination invariant textural MRF features. In: CIVR, pp. 448–454. ACM, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Santini, S., Jain, R.: Similarity measures. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 21(9), 871–883 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ma, W.Y., Manjunath, B.S.: Texture features and learning similarity, pp. 425–430. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1996)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bovik, A.: Analysis of multichannel narrow-band filters for image texture segmentation. IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing 39(9), 2025–2043 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jain, A., Healey, G.: A multiscale representation including opponent colour features for texture recognition. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 7(1), 125–128 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ojala, T., Pietikäinen, M., Mäenpää, T.: Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 24(7), 971–987 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tatler, B.W.: The central fixation bias in scene viewing: Selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions. Journal of Vision 7(14), 1–17 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jiří Filip
    • 1
  • Pavel Vácha
    • 1
  • Michal Haindl
    • 1
  • Patrick R. Green
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Information Theory and Automation of the ASCRCzech Republic
  2. 2.School of Life SciencesHeriot-Watt UniversityEdinburghScotland

Personalised recommendations