Unconventional Superconductivity

Chapter
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)

Abstract

Superconductivity in the cuprates has been a problem standing for more than two decades and there is still no agreement on the pairing mechanism. For some recent reviews see [1, 2, 3]. Superconductivity, however, is not the only interesting property of cuprates. The normal state (T > T c ) has also anomalous properties. Still today it is a challenge to explain the normal state properties and in particular the underdoped region of the phase diagram, which remains a controversial topic.

Keywords

Fermi Liquid CuO2 Plane Fermi Liquid Theory Pseudogap Phase Underdoped Region 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    P.A. Lee et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 17 (2006)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Orenstein et al., Science 288, 468 (2000)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M.R. Norman, Rep. Prog. Phys., 66, 1547 (2003)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Ino et al., Phys. Rev. B 65, 094504 (2002)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Imada et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 1039 (1998)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Nakamae et al., Phys. Rev. B 68, 100502 (2003)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Takagi et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2975 (1992)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Ding et al., Nature 382, 51 (1996)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. Timusk et al., Rep. Prog. Phys. 62, 61 (1999)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Y. Wang et al., Phys. Rev. B 64, 224519 (2001)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Y. Wang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 257003 (2002)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    N.D. Marthur et al., Nature 394, 39 (1998)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    H.V. Löhneysen et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 1015 (2007)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Coleman et al., J. Phys. Condens. Matter 13, R723 (2001)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nat. Phys. 2, 138 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    N. Gedik et al., Science 316, 425 (2007)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    P.W. Anderson, Science 235, 1196 (1987)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    P.W. Anderson, Nature Phys. 2, 626 (2006)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    P.W. Anderson et al., J. Phys. Condens. Matter 16, R755 (2004)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    A.V. Chubukov et al., Phys. Rep. 288, 355 (1997)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. Abanov et al., Adv. Phys. 52, 119 (2003)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    S.A. Kivelson et al., Rev. Modern Phys. 75, 1201 (2003)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    D.J. Scalapino et al., Phys. Rev. B 34, 8190 (1986)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    N.E. Bickers et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 961 (1989)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    P. Monthoux et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3448 (1991)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    N. Bulut et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 706 (1992)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    H. Ding et al., Phys. Rev. B 54, R9678 (1996)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    A. Damascelli et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 473 (2003)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    A. Kanigel, et al. Nature Phys. 2, 447 (2006)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    M.R. Norman et al., Nature 392, 157 (1998)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    W.S. Lee et al., Nature 450, 81 (2007)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    A.G. Loeser et al., Science 273, 325 (1996)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    A.G. Loeser et al., Phys. Rev. B 56, 14185 (1997)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    K. Gomes et al., Nature 447, 569 (2007)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    M.C. Boyer et al., Nature Phys. 3, 802 (2007)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Z.A. Xu et al., Nature 406, 486 (2000)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    M. Le Tacon et al., Nature Phys. 2, 537 (2006)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    L. Pintschovius. Phys. Status Solidi B 242, 30 (2005)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    S.L. Chaplot et al., Phys. Rev. B 52, 7230 (1995)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    D. Reznik et al., Nature 440, 1170 (2006)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    M. Bakr et al., Phys. Rev. B (2009, submitted)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    C. Thomsen et al., Phys. Rev. B 37, 9860 (1988)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    D. Reznik et al., Phys. Rev. B 78, 094507 (2008)CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    D. Reznik et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2396 (1995)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    H.F. Fong et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 316 (1995)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    A. Lanzara et al., Nature 412, 510 (2001)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    T. Valla et al., Science 285, 2110 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    A. Kaminski et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1788 (2000)CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    A.D. Gromko et al., Phys. Rev. B 68, 174520 (2003)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    T. Sato et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 157003 (2003)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    X.J. Zhou et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 227002 (2005)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    W. Meevasana et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 157003 (2006)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for Solid State ResearchStuttgartGermany
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations