On Using Home Networks and Cloud Computing for a Future Internet of Things

  • Heiko Niedermayer
  • Ralph Holz
  • Marc-Oliver Pahl
  • Georg Carle
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6152)

Abstract

In this position paper we state four requirements for a Future Internet and sketch our initial concept. The requirements: (1) more comfort, (2) integration of home networks, (3) resources like service clouds in the network, and (4) access anywhere on any machine. Future Internet needs future quality and future comfort. There need to be new possiblities for everyone. Our focus is on higher layers and related to the many overlay proposals. We consider them to run on top of a basic Future Internet core. A new user experience means to include all user devices. Home networks and services should be a fundamental part of the Future Internet. Home networks extend access and allow interaction with the environment. Cloud Computing can provide reliable resources beyond local boundaries. For access anywhere, we also need secure storage for data and profiles in the network, in particular for access with non-personal devices (Internet terminal, ticket machine, ...).

Keywords

Cloud Computing Service Cloud Overlay Network High Layer Cloud Resource 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lemke, M.: The EU Future Internet Research and Experimentation (FIRE) Activities. In: 8th Würzburg Workshop on IP (EuroView 2008) (July 2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    AutHoNe-DE Consortium: AutHoNe-DE Project - Home Page (2009), http://www.authone.de
  3. 3.
    Cheng, L., Galis, A., Mathieu, B., Jean, K., Ocampo, R., Mamatas, L., Rubio-Loyola, J., Serrat, J., Berl, A., Meer, H., Davy, S., Movahedi, Z., Lefevre, L.: Self-organising management overlays for future internet services. In: van der Meer, S., Burgess, M., Denazis, S. (eds.) MACE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5276, pp. 74–89. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bless, R., Hübsch, C., Mies, S., Waldhorst, O.: The Underlay Abstraction in the Spontaneous Virtual Networks (SpoVNet) Architecture. In: Proc. of 4th EuroNGI Conf. on Next Generation Internet Networks, NGI 2008 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hübsch, C., Mayer, C.P., Mies, S., Bless, R., Waldhorst, O.P., Zitterbart, M.: Reconnecting the internet with ariba: Self-organizing provisioning of end-to-end connectivity in heterogeneous networks. In: SIGCOMM 2009, Demos (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hanka, O., Spleiss, C., Kunzmann, G., Eberspächer, J.: A DHT-inspired clean-slate approach for the Next Generation Internet. In: Fachgespräche Future Internet in Karlsruhe, ch. 2 (November 2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Menth, M., Hartmann, M., Klein, D., Tran-Gia, P.: Future internet routing: Motivation and design issues. Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag it - Information Technology 50(6) (December 2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jokela, P., Nikander, P., Melen, J., Ylitalo, J., Wall, J.: Host identity protocol (extended abstract). In: Wireless World Research Forum,Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Trossen, D. (ed.), et al.: Conceptual Architecture of PSIRP Including Subcomponent Descriptions (D2.2) (June 2008), http://www.psirp.org/publications
  10. 10.
    Zahemsky, A., Esteve, C., Csaszar, A., Nikander, P.: Exploring the pubsub routing & forwarding space. In: ICC Workshop on the Network of The FutureGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Google Inc.: Google App Engine, http://code.google.com/intl/en/appengine/
  12. 12.
    Amazon Inc.: Amazon Web Services, http://aws.amazon.com/
  13. 13.
    Carle, G., Kinkelin, H., Müller, A., Niedermayer, H., Pahl, M.O., König, A., Luckenbach, T., Scholl, K., Schuster, M., Thiem, L., Petrak, L., Steinmetz, M., Niedermeier, C., Reichmann, J.: Autonomic Home Networks in the BMBF project AutHoNe. In: 8th Würzburg Workshop on IP EuroView 2008 (July 2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Luckenbach, T., Schuster, M., Pahl, M.O.: An autonomic home networking infrastructure. ERCIM News 77 - Special theme: Future Internet Technology, 41 (April 2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    The Zfone Project (2008), http://zfoneproject.com
  16. 16.
    Rowstron, A., Druschel, P.: Pastry: Scalable, distributed object location and routing for large-scale Peer-to-Peer systems. In: Guerraoui, R. (ed.) Middleware 2001. LNCS, vol. 2218, pp. 329–350. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Holz, R., Niedermayer, H., Hauck, P., Carle, G.: Trust-rated authentication for domain-structured distributed systems. In: Mjølsnes, S.F., Mauw, S., Katsikas, S.K. (eds.) EuroPKI 2008. LNCS, vol. 5057, pp. 74–88. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gutmann, P.: PKI: It’s not dead, just resting. IEEE Computer 35(8), 41–49 (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heiko Niedermayer
    • 1
  • Ralph Holz
    • 1
  • Marc-Oliver Pahl
    • 1
  • Georg Carle
    • 1
  1. 1.Network Architectures and ServicesTechnische Universität MünchenGarching b. MünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations