Defining a Taxonomy for Research Areas on ICT for Governance and Policy Modelling

  • Fenareti Lampathaki
  • Yannis Charalabidis
  • Spyros Passas
  • David Osimo
  • Melanie Bicking
  • Maria A. Wimmer
  • Dimitris Askounis
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6228)

Abstract

As governments across the world provide more and more support to open data initiatives and web 2.0 channels for engaging citizens, researchers orient themselves towards future internet, wisdom of crowds and virtual world experiments. In this context, the domain of ICT for Governance and Policy Modelling has recently emerged to achieve better, participative, evidence-based and timely governance. This paper presents a taxonomy classifying the research themes, the research areas and the research sub-areas that challenge this domain in order to deal with its diversity and complexity. Taking into account advancements in research, policy and practice, the taxonomy brings together the open, linked data and visual analytics philosophy; the social media buzz taming collective wisdom in decision-making; and the future internet approaches around cloud computing, internet of things and internet of services, while embracing the collaborative policy modelling aspects and the safeguarding against misuse implications.

Keywords

ICT for Governance and Policy Modelling Taxonomy Research Areas Open Government Social Computing Future Internet Safeguard against misuse 

References

  1. 1.
    Aigner, W., Bertone, A., Miksch, S.: Tutorial: Introduction to visual analytics. In: Holzinger, A. (ed.) USAB 2007. LNCS, vol. 4799, pp. 453–456. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ala-Mutka, et al.: The Impact of Social Computing on the EU Information Society and Economy. IPTS Reports (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Australian Government 2.0 Taskforce: Engage - Getting on with Government 2.0 (2009), http://gov2.net.au/files/2009/12/Draft-Government-2-0-Report-release.pdf
  4. 4.
    Berners-Lee, T.: Linked data (2007), http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.htm
  5. 5.
    Binali, H., Potdar, V., Chen, W.: A state of the art opinion mining and its application domains. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, pp. 1–6 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked Data - The Story So Far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), Special Issue on Linked Data 5(3), 1–22 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Buyya, R., Shin, C., Venugopal, S., Broberg, J., Brandic, I.: Cloud computing and emerging IT platforms: Vision, hype, and reality for delivering computing as the 5th utility. Future Generation Computer Systems 25(6), 599–616 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Botterman, M., Millard, J., Horlings, E., van Oranje, C., van Deelen, M., Pedersen, K.: Value for citizens-A vision of public governance in 2020. European Commission (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Charalabidis, Y., Gionis, G., Moritz Hermann, K., Martinez, C.: Enterprise Interoperability Research Roadmap, Draft Version 5.0 (2008), ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/fp7/ict/docs/enet/ei-roadmap-5-0-draft_en.pdf
  10. 10.
    Charalabidis, Y., Koussouris, S., Kipenis, L.: Report on the Objectives, Structure and Status of eParticipation Initiative Projects in the European Union. MOMENTUM White Paper (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Charron, C., Favier, J., Li, C.: Social Computing: How Networks Erode Institutional Power, And What to Do About It. Forrester Research (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chopra, A.: Cloud Computing in Government. Wired Magazine (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Codagnone, C., Wimmer, M.A.: Roadmapping eGovernment Research - Visions and Measures towards Innovative Governments in 2020. Results from the EC-funded Project eGovRTD2020 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    CORDIS: Software & Service Architectures and Infrastructures (2010), http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/ssai/home_en.html
  15. 15.
    CROSSROAD Project (2010), http://www.crossroad-eu.net
  16. 16.
    European Commission: The Future of the Internet: A Compendium of European Projects on ICT Research Supported by the EU 7th Framework Programme for RTD (2008), ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/fp7/ict/docs/ch1-g848-280-future-internet_en.pdf
  17. 17.
    European Commission: European Challenges and Flagships 2020 and beyond, Report of the ICT Advisory Group, ISTAG (2009), ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/fp7/ict/docs/fet-proactive/press-17_en.pdf
  18. 18.
    European Commission: Future Internet 2020, Visions of an Industry Expert Group (2009), http://www.future-internet.eu/fileadmin/documents/reports/FI_Panel_Report_v3.1_Final.pdf
  19. 19.
    European Commission: Internet of Things: Strategic Research Roadmap (2009), ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/fp7/ict/docs/enet/cerp-iot-sra-iot-v11_en.pdf
  20. 20.
    Gilbert, N., Troitzsch, K.G.: Simulation for the Social Scientist (2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Heeks, R., Bailura, S.: Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly 24(2), 243–265 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Heer, J., Agrawala, M.: Design considerations for collaborative visual analytics. Information Visualization 7(1), 49–62 (2008) doi:10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Macintosh, A.: eParticipation in policy-making: the research and the challenges. In: Exploiting the Knowledge Economy: Issues, Applications, Case Studies. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Meskell, D.: Transparency and Open Government (2009), http://www.usaservices.gov/events_news/documents/Transparency_000.pdf (retrieved February 15, 2010)
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
    Nasukawa, T., Yi, J.: Sentiment Analysis: Capturing favourability using natural language processing. In: Second International Conference on Knowledge Capture, Florida, USA (2003)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Obama, B.: Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies: Transparency and Open Government (2009), http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Transparency_and_Open_Government/
  28. 28.
    Open Government Working Group (2010), http://www.opengovdata.org/
  29. 29.
    Osimo, D., Zinnbauer, D., Bianchi, A.: The Future of eGovernment, an exploration of ICT-driven models of eGovernment for the EU in 2020, IPTS Report (2007)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Scholl, H.J.: Profiling the EG Research Community and Its Core. In: Wimmer, M.A., et al. (eds.) EGOV 2009. LNCS, vol. 5693, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Smith, T.: Power to the people - Social Media Tracker Wave 3, Universal McCann (2008)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Government, U.H.: Putting the Frontline First: Action Plan (2009), http://www.hmg.gov.uk/frontlinefirst/actionplan.aspx

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fenareti Lampathaki
    • 1
  • Yannis Charalabidis
    • 2
  • Spyros Passas
    • 1
  • David Osimo
    • 3
  • Melanie Bicking
    • 4
  • Maria A. Wimmer
    • 4
  • Dimitris Askounis
    • 1
  1. 1.National Technical University of AthensAthensGreece
  2. 2.University of the AegeanKarlovassiGreece
  3. 3.Tech4i2 ltd.Thurcaston, LeicestershireUK
  4. 4.University of Koblenz-LandauKoblenzGermany

Personalised recommendations