Information Strategies for Open Government: Challenges and Prospects for Deriving Public Value from Government Transparency

  • Sharon S. Dawes
  • Natalie Helbig
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6228)


Information-based strategies to promote open government offer many opportunities to generate social and economic value through public use of government information. Public and political expectations for the success of these strategies are high but they confront the challenges of making government data “fit for use” by a variety of users outside the government. Research findings from a study of public use of land records demonstrates the inherent complexity of public use of government information, while research from information science, management information systems, and e-government offer perspectives on key factors associated with effective information use. The paper concludes with practical recommendations for information-based open government strategies as well as areas for future research.


Government Information Strategies Open Government Transparency Public Value 


  1. 1.
    Ballou, D., Pazer, H.: Designing Information Systems to Optimize the accuracy-timeliness tradeoff. Information Systems Research 6(1), 51–72 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ballou, D., Tayi, G.: Enhancing data quality in data warehouse environments. Communications of the ACM 42(1), 73 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bellamy, C., Taylor, J.: Governing in the information age. Open University Press, Philadelphia (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cook, M., Dawes, S., Helbig, N., Lishnoff, R.: Use of Parcel Data in New York State: A Reconnaissance Study (2005),
  5. 5.
    Dawes, S.: Information policy meta-principles: stewardship and usefulness. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dawes, S., Pardo, T.A., Cresswell, A.M.: Designing electronic government information access programs: A holistic approach. Government Information Quarterly 21, 3–23 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dawes, S., Helbig, N., Cook, M.: Governance of Public Information Resources: Lessons from a field study of land parcel data. Available upon request to the authors (working paper)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., Tinkler, J.: New public management is dead: Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16, 467–494 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Klischewski, R., Scholl, H.J.: Information quality as a common ground for key players in e-government integration and interoperability. Presented at 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Big Island, Hawaii (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meijer, A.: Understanding modern transparency. International Review of Administrative Sciences 75, 255–269 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    OMB (US Office of Management and Budget), Open Government Directive (2009),
  12. 12.
    Pipino, L., Lee, Y., Wang, R.: Data quality assessment. Communications of the ACM 45(4), 211–218 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Radin, B.: Challenging the performance movement: Accountability, complexity, and democratic values. Georgetown University Press, Washington (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang, R., Strong, D.: Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data Consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems 12(4), 5–34 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sharon S. Dawes
    • 1
  • Natalie Helbig
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Technology in GovernmentUniversity at Albany/SUNYUSA

Personalised recommendations