Adaptive Capacities of European City Regions in Climate Change: On the Importance of Governance Innovations for Regional Climate Policies

  • Sybille Bauriedl
Conference paper
Part of the Climate Change Management book series (CCM)


The higher the adaptive capacity of a region, the lower its socio-economic vulnerability is. Regional adaptive capacity is dependent on conditions such as economic power, technology, knowledge, institutions, infrastructure, and social equity. Not only are the impacts of climate change regionally very diverse, but the regional conditions to adapt to climate change are too. The paper discusses the implication of knowledge, institutional and infrastructure conditions of adaptation and the interdependencies of these conditions. Empirical outcomes of the case study in Northern Hesse (Germany) give some examples for the challenges of establishing regional governance innovations to handle these interdependencies. Another dominant condition of adaptive capacity is the discursive frames of regional climate change. While in international agreements and policy advice, resource-intensive economies and lifestyles are criticized as the main polluters, climate change debates at the regional level stress the options of climate change to strengthen regional economic competition. The paper suggests a perspective on multi-level governance and a perspective on policy integration for climate change adaptation to create a wide analytical view on these complex factors.


Adaptation Adaptive capacity Climate change governance Policy integration Regional governance Urbanization Vulnerability 


  1. Adger WN, Huq S, Brown K, Conway D, Hulme M (2003) Adaptation to climate change in the developing world. Prog Dev 3:179–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bach I, Flinders M (2004) Themes and issues in multi-level governance. In: Flinders M, Bach I (eds) Multi-level governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauriedl S (2007) Spielräume nachhaltiger Entwicklung: Die Macht stadtentwicklungspolitischer Diskurse. MünchenGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauriedl S, Wissen M (2002) Post-Fordist transformation, the sustainability concept and social relations with nature. A case study of the Hamburg region. J Environ Policy Plann 4:107–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauriedl S, Baasch S, Winkler M (2008) Die klimagerechte europäische Stadt? Siedlungsstrukturen, städtischer Lebensstandard und Klimaveränderungen. RaumPlanung 137:67–71Google Scholar
  6. Bulkeley H, Betsill H (2003) Cities and climate change. Routledge, New York, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Eliasson I (2000) The use of climate knowledge in urban planning. Landsc Urban Plan 48:31–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hunt JDR, Maslin M, Killeen T, Backlund P, Schellnhuber HJ (2007) Introduction. Climate Change and urban areas: research dialogue in a policy framework. Philos Trans Roy Soc 365:2615–2629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. IHDP (2005) Science plan. Urbanization and global environmental change. IHDP, BonnGoogle Scholar
  10. IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007. Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report, IPCC, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Kelly PM, Adger WN (2000) Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Clim Change 47(4):325–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lebel L et al (2006) Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 11(1):19Google Scholar
  13. PEER – Partnership for European environmental research (2009) Climate policy integration, coherence and governance. PEER, SastamalaGoogle Scholar
  14. Ruth M (2006) Smart growth and climate change. Regional development, infrastructure and adaptation. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  15. Schipper ELF, Burton I (2009) Understanding adaptation: origins, concepts, practices and policy. In: Schipper ELF, Burton I (eds) The Earthscan reader on adaptation to climate change. Earthscan, London, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  16. Siebel W (2004) Einleitung. Die europäische Stadt. In Siebel W (ed) Die europäische Stadt. Frankfurt a. M., Germany, pp 11–48Google Scholar
  17. Sieverts T (1997) Zwischenstadt: zwischen Ort und Welt. Raum und Zeit, Stadt und Land, BraunschweigGoogle Scholar
  18. Smit B, Pilifosova O (2001) Adaptation to climate change in the context of sustainable development. In: McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White K (eds) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambrdige, pp 807–812Google Scholar
  19. Smith N (1984) Uneven development. Nature, capital and the production of space. Idea, Oxford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Stoker G (1998) Governance as theory: five propositions. Int Soc Sci J 155:17–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sybille Bauriedl
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Research in Political SciencesUniversity of KasselKasselGermany

Personalised recommendations