Human Activity Recognition Using Inertial/Magnetic Sensor Units
This paper provides a comparative study on the different techniques of classifying human activities that are performed using body-worn miniature inertial and magnetic sensors. The classification techniques implemented and compared in this study are: Bayesian decision making (BDM), the least-squares method (LSM), the k-nearest neighbor algorithm (k-NN), dynamic time warping (DTW), support vector machines (SVM), and artificial neural networks (ANN). Daily and sports activities are classified using five sensor units worn by eight subjects on the chest, the arms, and the legs. Each sensor unit comprises a triaxial gyroscope, a triaxial accelerometer, and a triaxial magnetometer. Principal component analysis (PCA) and sequential forward feature selection (SFFS) methods are employed for feature reduction. For a small number of features, SFFS demonstrates better performance and should be preferable especially in real-time applications. The classifiers are validated using different cross-validation techniques. Among the different classifiers we have considered, BDM results in the highest correct classification rate with relatively small computational cost.
Keywordsinertial sensors magnetometers human activity recognition and classification feature selection and reduction
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 7.Sabatini, A.M.: Inertial sensing in biomechanics: a survey of computational techniques bridging motion analysis and personal navigation. In: Computational Intelligence for Movement Sciences: Neural Networks and Other Emerging Techniques, pp. 70–100. Idea Group Publishing, USA (2006)Google Scholar
- 12.Jovanov, E., Milenkovic, A., Otto, C., de Groen, P.: A wireless body area network of intelligent motion sensors for computer assisted physical rehabilitation. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2(6) (2005)Google Scholar
- 15.Aylward, R., Paradiso, J.A.: Sensemble: A wireless, compact, multi-user sensor system for interactive dance. In: Proc. Conf. New Interfaces Musical Expression, Paris, France, June 4-8, pp. 134–139 (2006)Google Scholar
- 16.Shiratori, T., Hodgins, J.K.: Accelerometer-based user interfaces for the control of a physically simulated character. ACM T. Graphic. 27(5) (2008)Google Scholar
- 25.Xsens Technologies B.V. Enschede, Holland: MTi and MTx User Manual and Technical Documentation (2009), http://www.xsens.com
- 29.Preece, S.J., Goulermas, J.Y., Kenney, L.P.J., Howard, D., Meijer, K., Crompton, R.: Activity identification using body-mounted sensors—a review of classification techniques. Physiol. Meas. 30(4), R1–R33 (2009)Google Scholar
- 30.Chang, C.C., Lin, C.J.: LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines (2001), Software available at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm
- 31.Preece, S.J., Goulermas, J.Y., Kenney, L.P.J., Howard, D.: A comparison of feature extraction methods for the classification of dynamic activities from accelerometer data. IEEE T. Bio-med. Eng. 56(3), 871–879 (2009)Google Scholar