Advertisement

Dominance Signals in Debates

  • Isabella Poggi
  • Francesca D’Errico
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6219)

Abstract

The paper analyzes the signals of dominance in different modalities displayed during TV talk shows and debates. Dominance is defined, according to a model in terms of goals and beliefs, as a person’s having more power than others. A scheme is presented for the annotation of signals of dominance in political debates: based on the analysis of videotaped data, a typology is proposed of strategies to convey dominance, and the corresponding signals are overviewed. Strategies range from the aggressive ones of imperiousness, judgement, invasion, norm violation and defiance, to the more subtle touchiness and victimhood, ending up with haughtiness, irony and ridicule, easiness, carelessness and assertiveness.

Keywords

Dominance Social signals Debates 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ridgeway, C.L.: Gender, status and leadership. Journal of Social Issues 57, 637–655 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tajfel, H.: Interindividual behaviour and intergroup behaviour. In: Tajfel, H. (ed.) Differentation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations, pp. 27–60. Academic Press, London (1978)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tajfel, H., Turner, J.C.: The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In: Worchel, S., Austin, W.G. (eds.) Psychology of intergroup behaviour. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1986)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ellyson, S.L., Dovidio, J.F.: Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior: Basic concepts and nonverbal behavior. In: Ellyson, S.L., Dovidio, J.F. (eds.) Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior, pp. 1–27. Springer, New York (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aries, E.J., Gold, C., Weigel, R.H.: Dispositional and situational influences on dominance behavior in small groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44, 779–786 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burgoon, J.K., Dunbar, N.E.: An interactionist perspective on dominance submission: Interpersonal dominance as a dynamic, situationally contingent social skill. Communication Monographs 67, 96–121 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dunbar, N.E., Burgoon, J.K.: Perceptions of power and interactional dominance in interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 22, 231–257 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Prato, E., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L.M., Malle, B.F.: Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67, 741–763 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dunbar, N.E., Bippus, A.M., Young, S.L.: Interpersonal Dominance in Relational Conflict: a view from Dyadic Power Theory. Interpersona 2(1), 1–33 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ridgeway, C.L.: Nonverbal Behavior, Dominance, and the Basis of Status in Task Groups. American Sociological Review 52, 683–694 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Argyle, M.: Bodily Communication, 2nd edn. Methuen, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Keating, C.F., Bai, D.L.: Children’s attributes of social dominance from facial cues. Child Development 57, 1269–1276 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tracy, J.L., Robins, R.W.: The prototypical pride expression: Development of a nonverbal behavioral coding system. Emotion 7, 789–801 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cashdan, E.: Smiles, speech, and body posture: How women and men display sociometric status and power. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 22, 209–228 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gregory, S.W., Webster, S.: A nonverbal signal in voices of interview partners effectively predicts communication accommodation and social status perceptions. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 70, 1231–1240 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jayagopi, D.B., Hung, H., Yeo, C., Gatica-Perez, D.: Modeling dominance in group conversations using nonverbal activity cues. Trans. Audio, Speech and Lang. Proc. 17(3) (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stein, R.T., Heller, T.: An empirical analysis of the correlations between leadership status and participation rate reported in literature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37, 1993–2003 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brooke, M.E., Ng, S.H.: Language and social influence in small conversation groups. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 5, 201–210 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ng, S.H., Bradac, J.J.: X Power in language. Sage Publication, N.P (1986)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Cognitive and social action. University College of London Press, London (1995)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Castelfranchi, C.: Micro-Macro Constitution of Power, ProtoSociology. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 18-19, 208-265 (2003)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Poggi, I.: Mind, hands, face and body. In: A goal and belief view of multimodal communication. Weidler, Berlin (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Giglioli, P., Cavicchioli, S., Fele, G.: Rituali di degradazione. Anatomia del processo Cusani, Bologna, il Mulino (1997)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Garfinkel, H.: Studies in ethnometodology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1967)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Goffman, E.: Modelli di interazione, Il Mulino, Bologna (1967)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Castelfranchi, C.: Che figura. Emozioni e immagine sociale, Bologna, Il Mulino (1988)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Poggi, I.: Irony, humour ad ridicule. Power, image and judicial rhetoric in an Italian political trial. In: Vion, R. (ed.) La corporalité du langage. Multimodalitè, discourse, écriture. Hommage à Claire Maury-Rouan. Publications de L’Université de Provence, Aix-en-Provence (2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kelly, J.A., Kern, J.M., Kirkley, B.G., Patterson, J.N., Keane, T.M.: Reactions to assertive versus unassertive behavior: Differential effects of males and female and implications for assertiveness training. Behavior Therapy 11, 670–682 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Isabella Poggi
    • 1
  • Francesca D’Errico
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze dell’EducazioneUniversità Roma TreRomaItaly

Personalised recommendations