TopX 2.0 at the INEX 2009 Ad-Hoc and Efficiency Tracks

Distributed Indexing for Top-k-Style Content-And-Structure Retrieval
  • Martin Theobald
  • Ablimit Aji
  • Ralf Schenkel
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6203)

Abstract

This paper presents the results of our INEX 2009 Ad-hoc and Efficiency track experiments. While our scoring model remained almost unchanged in comparison to previous years, we focused on a complete redesign of our XML indexing component with respect to the increased need for scalability that came with the new 2009 INEX Wikipedia collection, which is about 10 times larger than the previous INEX collection. TopX now supports a CAS-specific distributed index structure, with a completely parallel execution of all indexing steps, including parsing, sampling of term statistics for our element-specific BM25 ranking model, as well as sorting and compressing the index lists into our final inverted block-index structure. Overall, TopX ranked among the top 3 systems in both the Ad-hoc and Efficiency tracks, with a maximum value of 0.61 for iP[0.01] and 0.29 for MAiP in focused retrieval mode at the Ad-hoc track. Our fastest runs achieved an average runtime of 72 ms per CO query, and 235 ms per CAS query at the Efficiency track, respectively.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Clarke, C.L.A.: Controlling overlap in content-oriented XML retrieval. In: Baeza-Yates, R.A., Ziviani, N., Marchionini, G., Moffat, A., Tait, J. (eds.) SIGIR, pp. 314–321. ACM, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dean, J., Ghemawat, S.: MapReduce: Simplified data processing on large clusters. In: OSDI 2004, pp. 137–150 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kamps, J., Pehcevski, J., Kazai, G., Lalmas, M., Robertson, S.: INEX 2007 evaluation measures. In: Fuhr, N., Kamps, J., Lalmas, M., Trotman, A. (eds.) INEX 2007. LNCS, vol. 4862, pp. 24–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lu, W., Robertson, S.E., MacFarlane, A.: Field-weighted XML retrieval based on BM25. In: Fuhr, N., Lalmas, M., Malik, S., Kazai, G. (eds.) INEX 2005. LNCS, vol. 3977, pp. 161–171. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Robertson, S.E., Walker, S., Hancock-Beaulieu, M., Gatford, M., Payne, A.: Okapi at TREC-4. In: TREC (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Robertson, S.E., Zaragoza, H., Taylor, M.: Simple BM25 extension to multiple weighted fields. In: Grossman, D., Gravano, L., Zhai, C., Herzog, O., Evans, D.A. (eds.) CIKM, pp. 42–49. ACM, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Theobald, M., AbuJarour, M., Schenkel, R.: TopX 2.0 at the INEX 2008 Efficiency Track. In: Geva, S., Kamps, J., Trotman, A. (eds.) INEX 2008. LNCS, vol. 5631, pp. 224–236. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Theobald, M., Bast, H., Majumdar, D., Schenkel, R., Weikum, G.: TopX: efficient and versatile top-k query processing for semistructured data. VLDB J. 17(1), 81–115 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Theobald, M., Schenkel, R., Weikum, G.: An efficient and versatile query engine for TopX search. In: Böhm, K., Jensen, C.S., Haas, L.M., Kersten, M.L., Larson, P.-Å., Ooi, B.C. (eds.) VLDB, pp. 625–636. ACM, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Trotman, A., Sigurbjörnsson, B.: Narrowed Extended XPath I (NEXI). In: Fuhr, N., Lalmas, M., Malik, S., Szlávik, Z. (eds.) INEX 2004. LNCS, vol. 3493, pp. 16–40. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Theobald
    • 1
  • Ablimit Aji
    • 2
  • Ralf Schenkel
    • 3
  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for InformaticsSaarbrückenGermany
  2. 2.Emory UniversityAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.Saarland UniversitySaarbrückenGermany

Personalised recommendations