Advertisement

Critical Success Factors for Rapid, Innovative Solutions

  • Jo Ann Lane
  • Barry Boehm
  • Mark Bolas
  • Azad Madni
  • Richard Turner
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6195)

Abstract

Many of today’s problems are in search of new, innovative solutions. However, the development of new and innovative solutions has been elusive to many, resulting in considerable effort and dollars and no solution or a mediocre solution late to the marketplace or customer. This paper describes the results of research conducted to identify the critical success factors employed by several successful, high-performance organizations in the development of innovative systems. These critical success factors span technical, managerial, people, and cultural aspects of the innovative environment.

Keywords

critical success factors innovation systems engineering 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Arthur, L.: Rapid Evolutionary Development. Wiley, Chichester (1991)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    McConnell, S.: Rapid Development. Microsoft Press, Redmond (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beck, K.: Extreme Programming Explained. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boehm, B., Turner, R.: Balancing Agility and Discipline. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Christensen, C.: The Innovator’s Dilemma. Harper Collins (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chesbrough, H.: Open Innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brown, S., Eisenhardt, K.: Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kreitman, K.: From the magic gig to reliable organizations: A new paradigm for the control of complex systems. Paper presented at the symposium on complex systems engineering (1996), http://cs.calstatela.edu/wiki/index.php/Symposium_on_Complex_Systems_Engineering (accessed on 1/11/2007)
  9. 9.
    SEI. Capability maturity model integration (CMMI), CMU/SEI-2002-TR-001 (2001) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ISO/IEC. ISO/IEC 15288:2002(E) Systems engineering - system life cycle processes (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Electronic Industries Alliance, EIA Standard 632: Processes for Engineering a System (January 1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Highsmith, J.: Adaptive software development: A collaborative approach to managing complex systems. Dorset House Publishing, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Markus, M., Majchrzak, A., Gasser, L.: A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes. MIS Quarterly 26(3) (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sheard, S.A.: Practical Applications of Complexity Theory for Systems Engineers. Systems and Software Consortium, Inc. (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boehm, B., Lane, J.: 21st century processes for acquiring 21st century software-intensive systems of systems. CrossTalk - The Journal of Defense Software Engineering 19(5), 4–9 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kauffman, S.: At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wheatley, M.J.: Leadership and the New Science: Learning about Organization from an Orderly Universe. Berrett-Koehler Publishers (1992)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Madni, A.M., Brenner, M.A., Costea, I., MacGregor, D., Meshkinpour, F.: Option Generation: Problems, Principles, and Computer-Based Aiding. In: Proceedings of 1985 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Tucson, Arizona, November 1985, pp. 757–760 (1985)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Faste, R.: A Visual Essay on Invention and Innovation. Design Management Review 6(2) (1995)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Curtis, B., Krasner, H., Iscoe, N.: A Field Study of the Software Design Process for Large Systems. ACM Communications 31(11), 1268–1287 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jo Ann Lane
    • 1
  • Barry Boehm
    • 1
  • Mark Bolas
    • 1
  • Azad Madni
    • 1
  • Richard Turner
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Stevens Institute of TechnologyHobokenUSA

Personalised recommendations