Evolutionary Model of an Innovative and Differentiated Industry

  • José I. Santos
  • Ricardo del Olmo
  • Javier Pajares
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 322)


In this paper, we propose an agent based model that describes the spatial and temporal evolution of an industry composed of a set of heterogeneous firms distributed in different regions. The model formalizes a particular hypothesis about spatial agglomeration and industrial concentration phenomena in which innovation occupies the central place of economic and geographical growth explanation. Each company owns one or more manufacturing divisions that produce an exclusive variety of product. Economic selection is modeled as a monopolistic competition market where competitive pressure depends on consumers’ preference for variety. Moreover, firms may enjoy more competitive advantages innovating in processes, product characteristics and new commodities. The purpose of the model is integrating theories which come from research areas traditionally separated into a single formal proposal.


evolutionary economics industrial dynamics economic geography 


  1. 1.
    Fujita, M., Krugman, P., Venables, A.J.: The spatial economy: cities, regions and international trade. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boschma, R.A., Lambooy, J.G.: Evolutionary economics and economic geography. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 9(4), 411–429 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Audretsch, D.B., Feldman, M.P.: R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production. American Economic Review 86(3), 630–640 (1996)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baptista, R., Swann, P.: Do firms in clusters innovate more? Research Policy 27(5), 525–540 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frenken, K., Boschma, R.A.: A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process. Journal of Economic Geography 7(5), 635–649 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G.: An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1982)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Santos, J.I., Olmo, R., Pajares, J.: Selection processes in a monopolistic competition market. In: Hernandez, C. (ed.) Artificial Economics: the generative method in Economics. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 631, pp. 67–77. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    North, M.L., Collier, N.T., Vos, J.R.: Experiences Creating Three Implementations of the Repast Agent Modeling Toolkit. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation 16, 1–25 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dixit, A.K., Stiglitz, J.E.: Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity. American Economic Review 67(3), 297–308 (1977)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Klepper, S.: Industry life cycles. Industrial and Corporate Change 6(1), 145–181 (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Klevorick, A.K., Lewin, R.C., Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G.: On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy 24(2), 185–205 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Santos, J.I., Olmo, R., Pajares, J.: Innovation and knowledge spillovers in a networked industry. In: Consiglio, A. (ed.) Artificial Markets Modeling: Methods and Applications. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 599, pp. 171–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Klepper, S.: Employee startips in high-tech industries. Industrial and Corporate Change 10(3), 639–674 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • José I. Santos
    • 1
  • Ricardo del Olmo
    • 1
  • Javier Pajares
    • 2
  1. 1.INSISOCUniversity of BurgosSpain
  2. 2.INSISOCUniversity of ValladolidSpain

Personalised recommendations