Advertisement

ABC: An Academic Industrial-Strength Verification Tool

  • Robert Brayton
  • Alan Mishchenko
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6174)

Abstract

ABC is a public-domain system for logic synthesis and formal verification of binary logic circuits appearing in synchronous hardware designs. ABC combines scalable logic transformations based on And-Inverter Graphs (AIGs), with a variety of innovative algorithms. A focus on the synergy of sequential synthesis and sequential verification leads to improvements in both domains. This paper introduces ABC, motivates its development, and illustrates its use in formal verification.

Keywords

Model checking equivalence checking logic synthesis simulation integrated sequential verification flow 

References

  1. 1.
    Baumgartner, J., Kuehlmann, A.: Min-area retiming on flexible circuit structures. In: Proc. ICCAD ’01, pp. 176–182 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baumgartner, J., Mony, H., Paruthi, V., Kanzelman, R., Janssen, G.: Scalable sequential equivalence checking across arbitrary design transformations. In: Proc. ICCD ’06 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berkeley Verification and Synthesis Research Center (BVSRC), http://www.bvsrc.org
  4. 4.
    Biere, A.: AIGER: A format for And-Inverter Graphs, http://fmv.jku.at/aiger/
  5. 5.
    Bjesse, P., Boralv, A.: DAG-aware circuit compression for formal verification. In: Proc. ICCAD ’04, pp. 42–49 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bjesse, P., Kukula, J.H.: Automatic generalized phase abstraction for formal verification. In: Proc. ICCAD ’05, pp. 1076–1082 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brand, D.: Verification of large synthesized designs. In: Proc. ICCAD ’93, pp. 534–537 (1993)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brayton, R.K., Rudell, R., Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A.L., Wang, A.R.: MIS: A multiple-level logic optimization system. IEEE Trans. CAD 6(6), 1062–1081 (1987)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brayton, R.K., Hachtel, G.D., Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A., Somenzi, F., Aziz, A., Cheng, S.-T., Edwards, S., Khatri, S., Kukimoto, Y., Pardo, A., Qadeer, S., Ranjan, R.K., Sarwary, S., Shiple, T.R., Swamy, G., Villa, T.: VIS: A system for verification and synthesis. In: Alur, R., Henzinger, T.A. (eds.) CAV 1996. LNCS, vol. 1102. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brayton, R.: The synergy between logic synthesis and equivalence checking. In: Keynote at FMCAD’07 (2007), http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/hunt/FMCAD/2007/presentations/fmcad07_brayton.ppt
  11. 11.
    Bryant, R.E.: Graph based algorithms for Boolean function manipulation. IEEE TC 35(8), 677–691 (1986)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cabodi, G., Camurati, P., Garcia, L., Murciano, M., Nocco, S., Quer, S.: Speeding up model checking by exploiting explicit and hidden verification constraints. In: Proc. DATE ’09, pp. 1686–1691 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chai, D., Jiang, J.-H., Jiang, Y., Li, Y., Mishchenko, A., Brayton, R.: MVSIS 2.0 programmer’s manual. UC Berkeley (May 2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chatterjee, S., Mishchenko, A., Brayton, R., Wang, X., Kam, T.: Reducing structural bias in technology mapping. In: Proc. ICCAD ’05, pp. 519–526 (2005), http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~alanmi/publications/2005/iccad05_map.pdf
  15. 15.
    Coudert, O., Berthet, C., Madre, J.C.: Verification of sequential machines based on symbolic execution. In: Sifakis, J. (ed.) CAV 1989. LNCS, vol. 407. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Darringer, A., Joyner Jr., W.H., Berman, C.L., Trevillyan, L.: Logic synthesis through local transformations. IBM J. of Research and Development 25(4), 272–280 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Een, N., Mishchenko, A., Amla, N.: A single-instance incremental SAT formulation of proof- and counterexample-based abstraction. In: Proc. IWLS’10 (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jang, S., Chan, B., Chung, K., Mishchenko, A.: WireMap: FGPA technology mapping for improved routability. In: Proc. FPGA ’08, pp. 47–55 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jang, S., Chung, K., Mishchenko, A., Brayton, R.: A power optimization toolbox for logic synthesis and mapping. In: Proc. IWLS ’09, pp. 1–8 (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jiang, J.-H.R., Brayton, R.: Retiming and resynthesis: A complexity perspective. IEEE Trans. CAD 25(12), 2674–2686 (2006), http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~brayton/publications/2006/tcad06_r&r.pdf Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jiang, J.-H.R., Hung, W.-L.: Inductive equivalence checking under retiming and resynthesis. In: Proc. ICCAD’07, pp. 326–333 (2007)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kuehlmann, A., Paruthi, V., Krohm, F., Ganai, M.K.: Robust Boolean reasoning for equivalence checking and functional property verification. IEEE Trans. CAD 21(12), 1377–1394 (2002)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Leiserson, C.E., Saxe, J.B.: Retiming synchronous circuitry. Algorithmica 6, 5–35 (1991)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lamoureux, J., Wilton, S.J.E.: Activity estimation for Field-Programmable Gate Arrays. In: Proc. Intl Conf. Field-Prog. Logic and Applications (FPL), pp. 87–94 (2006)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mishchenko, A., Zhang, J.S., Sinha, S., Burch, J.R., Brayton, R., Chrzanowska-Jeske, M.: Using simulation and satisfiability to compute flexibilities in Boolean networks. IEEE Trans. CAD 25(5), 743–755 (2006)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mishchenko, A., Chatterjee, S., Brayton, R.: DAG-aware AIG rewriting: A fresh look at combinational logic synthesis. In: Proc. DAC ’06, pp. 532–536 (2006), http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~alanmi/publications/2006/dac06_rwr.pdf
  27. 27.
    Mishchenko, A., Chatterjee, S., Brayton, R., Een, N.: Improvements to combinational equivalence checking. In: Proc. ICCAD ’06, pp. 836–843 (2006)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mishchenko, A., Cho, S., Chatterjee, S., Brayton, R.: Combinational and sequential mapping with priority cuts. In: Proc. ICCAD ’07, pp. 354–361 (2007)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mishchenko, A., Case, M.L., Brayton, R.K., Jang, S.: Scalable and scalably-verifiable sequential synthesis. In: Proc. ICCAD’08, pp. 234–241 (2008)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mishchenko, A., Brayton, R., Jang, S.: Global delay optimization using structural choices. In: Proc. FPGA’10, pp. 181–184 (2010)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mishchenko, A., Een, N., Brayton, R.K., Jang, S., Ciesielski, M., Daniel, T.: Magic: An industrial-strength logic optimization, technology mapping, and formal verification tool. In: IWLS’10 (2010)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mony, H., Baumgartner, J., Paruthi, V., Kanzelman, R.: Exploiting suspected redundancy without proving it. In: Proc. DAC’05, pp. 463–466 (2005)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mony, H., Baumgartner, J., Mishchenko, A., Brayton, R.: Speculative reduction-based scalable redundancy identification. In: Proc. DATE’09, pp. 1674–1679 (2009)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ray, S., Mishchenko, A., Brayton, R.K., Jang, S., Daniel, T.: Minimum-perturbation retiming for delay optimization. In: Proc. IWLS’10 (2010)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sentovich, E.M., Singh, K.J., Lavagno, L., Moon, C., Murgai, R., Saldanha, A., Savoj, H., Stephan, P.R., Brayton, R.K., Sangiovanni-vincentelli, A.: SIS: A system for sequential circuit synthesis. Technical Report, UCB/ERI, M92/41, ERL, Dept. of EECS, UC Berkeley (1992)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Somenzi, F.: BDD package. CUDD v. 2.3.1, http://vlsi.colorado.edu/~fabio/CUDD/cuddIntro.html
  37. 37.
    Yang, C., Ciesielski, M., Singhal, V.: BDS: a BDD-based logic optimization system. In: Proc. DAC’00, pp. 92–97 (2000), http://www.ecs.umass.edu/ece/labs/vlsicad/bds/bds.html

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Brayton
    • 1
  • Alan Mishchenko
    • 1
  1. 1.EECS DepartmentUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations