Skip to main content

Disjunctive Questions, Intonation, and Highlighting

  • Conference paper
Logic, Language and Meaning

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6042))

Abstract

This paper examines how intonation affects the interpretation of disjunctive questions. The semantic effect of a question is taken to be three-fold. First, it raises an issue. In the tradition of inquisitive semantics, we model this by assuming that a question proposes several possible updates of the common ground (several possibilities for short) and invites other participants to help establish at least one of these updates. But apart from raising an issue, a question may also highlight and/or suggest certain possibilities, and intonation determines to a large extent which possibilities are highlighted/suggested.

This paper has benefited enormously from discussions with Maria Aloni, Ivano Ciardelli, Jeroen Groenendijk, and Kathryn Pruitt. Due to space limitations, the mode of presentation here is rather dense. For a slightly more slow-paced and elaborate version of the paper, see [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Roelofsen, F., van Gool, S.: Disjunctive questions, intonation, and highlighting. Technical report, ILLC, Univ. of Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pruitt, K.: Perceptual relevance of prosodic features in non-wh-questions with disjuction. University of Massachusetts Amherst (2007) (manuscript)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aloni, M., van Rooij, R.: The dynamics of questions and focus. In: Jackson, B. (ed.) Proceedings of SALT 12, Cornell University. CLC Publications (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Han, C., Romero, M.: The syntax of whether/Q... or questions: Ellipsis combined with movement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22(3), 527–564 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Beck, S., Kim, S.: Intervention effects in alternative questions. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 9, 165–208 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Biezma, M.: Alternative vs polar questions: the cornering effect. In: Ito, S., Cormany, E. (eds.) Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory, SALT XIX (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bartels, C.: The intonation of English statements and questions: a compositional interpretation. Routledge, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Groenendijk, J.: Inquisitive semantics: Two possibilities for disjunction. In: Bosch, P., Gabelaia, D., Lang, J. (eds.) Seventh International Tbilisi Symposium on Language, Logic, and Computation. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mascarenhas, S.: Inquisitive semantics and logic. MSc Thesis, Univ. of Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Groenendijk, J., Roelofsen, F.: Inquisitive semantics and pragmatics. Presented at the Workshop on Language, Communication, and Rational Agency at Stanford (2009), www.illc.uva.nl/inquisitive-semantics

  11. Ciardelli, I., Roelofsen, F.: Inquisitive logic. To appear in the Journal of Philosophical Logic (2009), www.illc.uva.nl/inquisitive-semantics

  12. Ciardelli, I.: Inquisitive semantics and intermediate logics. MSc Thesis, Univ. of Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Balogh, K.: Theme with variations: a context-based analysis of focus. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hamblin, C.L.: Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10, 41–53 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kratzer, A., Shimoyama, J.: Indeterminate pronouns: The view from Japanese. In: Otsu, Y. (ed.) The Proceedings of the Third Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, pp. 1–25 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Alonso-Ovalle, L.: Disjunction in Alternative Semantics. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Karttunen, L.: Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 3–44 (1977)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Groenendijk, J., Stokhof, M.: Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Krifka, M.: For a structured meaning account of questions and answers. Audiatur Vox Sapientia. A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, 287–319 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Blutner, R.: Questions and answers in an orthoalgebraic approach. University of Amsterdam (2009) (manuscript), http://www.blutner.de

  21. Partee, B.H., Rooth, M.: Generalized conjunction and type ambiguity. In: von Stechow, A. (ed.) Meaning, Use, and Interpretation. de Gruyter, Berlin (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zimmermann, E.: Free choice disjunction and epistemic possibility. Natural Language Semantics 8, 255–290 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Groenendijk, J.: Inquisitive semantics and dialogue pragmatics. Rutgers lecture notes (2008), www.illc.uva.nl/inquisitive-semantics

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Roelofsen, F., van Gool, S. (2010). Disjunctive Questions, Intonation, and Highlighting. In: Aloni, M., Bastiaanse, H., de Jager, T., Schulz, K. (eds) Logic, Language and Meaning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6042. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14287-1_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14287-1_39

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14286-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14287-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics