CBR Outcome Evaluation for High Similar Cases: A Preliminary Approach
Case-based reasoning has demonstrated to be a suitable similarity-based approach to develop decision-support system in different domains. However, in certain scenarios CBR finds difficulties to obtain a reliable solution when retrieved cases are highly similar. For example, patients from an Intensive Care Unit are critical patients in which slight variations of monitored parameters have a deep impact on the patient severity evaluation. In this scenario, it seems necessary to extend the system outcome in order to indicate the reliance of the solution obtained. Main efforts in the literature for CBR evaluation focus on case retrieval (i.e. similarity) or a retrospective analysis. However, these approaches do not seem to suffice when cases are very close. To this end, we propose three techniques to obtain a reliance solution degree, one based on case retrieval and two based on case adaptation. We also show the capacities of this proposal in a medical problem.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Aamodt, A., Plaza, E.: Case-based reasoning: Foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI Communications 7(1), 39–59 (1994)Google Scholar
- 5.Huellermeier, E.: Case-Based Approximate Reasoning. Springer, New York (2007)Google Scholar
- 8.Kohlmaier, A., Schmitt, S., Bergmann, R.: Evaluation of a similarity-based approach to customer-adaptive electronic sales dialogs. In: Empirical Evaluation of Adaptive Systems. Proceedings of the workshop held at the 8th International Conference on User Modelling, pp. 40–50 (2001)Google Scholar
- 9.Kolodner, J.L., Leake, D.B.: A Tutorial Introduction to Case-Based Reasoning, ch. 2, pp. 31–65. American Association for Artificial Intelligence (1996)Google Scholar
- 10.Koton, P.: Using experience in learning and problem solving. Technical Report, MIT/LCS/TR-441 (1989)Google Scholar
- 11.Leake, D.B.: CBR in Context: The Present and The Future, ch. 1, pp. 31–65. American Association for Artificial Intelligence (1996)Google Scholar