Natural Intelligence – Commonsense Question Answering with Conceptual Graphs
Natural Intelligence (NI) is a question answering system based on Combinatory Categorial Grammar (CCG) as the theory of grammar and Conceptual Graphs (CG) for knowledge representation and reasoning. CCG is a lexicalized theory of grammar and very suitable for semantic analysis. Conceptual Graphs is a special kind of semantic network which can express full first-order logic. It aims to address the problem of commonsense reasoning in question answering, by using the state of the art tools such as C&C tools, Cogitant and Open Cyc. C&C tools are used for parsing natural language, Cogitant is used for Conceptual Graph operations, and Open Cyc is used for upper ontology and commonsense handling.
KeywordsCombinatory Categorial Grammar Conceptual Graphs Commonsense Reasoning Open Cyc
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Bos, J., Clark, S., Steedman, M., Curran, J.R., Hockenmaier, J.: Wide-Coverage Semantic Representations from a CCG Parser. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2004), Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 1240–1246 (2004)Google Scholar
- 3.Steedman, M.: The Syntactic Process. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
- 4.Curran, J.R., Clark, S., Bos, J.: Linguistically Motivated Large-Scale NLP with C&C and Boxer. In: Proceedings of the ACL 2007 Demonstrations Session (ACL 2007 demo), pp. 29–32 (2007)Google Scholar
- 6.Sowa, J.F.: Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove (2000)Google Scholar
- 7.Hockenmaier, J.: Data and Models for Statistical Parsing with Combinatory Categorial Grammar. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh (2003)Google Scholar
- 8.Clark, S., Curran, J.R.: Wide-Coverage Efficient Statistical Parsing with CCG and Log-Linear Models. Computational Linguistics 33(4) (2007)Google Scholar
- 9.Peirce, C.S.: Manuscripts on existential graphs. In: Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 4, pp. 320–410. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1906)Google Scholar