Natural Intelligence – Commonsense Question Answering with Conceptual Graphs

  • Fatih Mehmet Güler
  • Aysenur Birturk
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6208)

Abstract

Natural Intelligence (NI) is a question answering system based on Combinatory Categorial Grammar (CCG) as the theory of grammar and Conceptual Graphs (CG) for knowledge representation and reasoning. CCG is a lexicalized theory of grammar and very suitable for semantic analysis. Conceptual Graphs is a special kind of semantic network which can express full first-order logic. It aims to address the problem of commonsense reasoning in question answering, by using the state of the art tools such as C&C tools, Cogitant and Open Cyc. C&C tools are used for parsing natural language, Cogitant is used for Conceptual Graph operations, and Open Cyc is used for upper ontology and commonsense handling.

Keywords

Combinatory Categorial Grammar Conceptual Graphs  Commonsense Reasoning Open Cyc 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    McCarthy, J.: Some Expert Systems Need Common Sense. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 426(1), 129–137 (1984) (Computer Cult)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bos, J., Clark, S., Steedman, M., Curran, J.R., Hockenmaier, J.: Wide-Coverage Semantic Representations from a CCG Parser. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2004), Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 1240–1246 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Steedman, M.: The Syntactic Process. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Curran, J.R., Clark, S., Bos, J.: Linguistically Motivated Large-Scale NLP with C&C and Boxer. In: Proceedings of the ACL 2007 Demonstrations Session (ACL 2007 demo), pp. 29–32 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sowa, J.F.: Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1984)MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sowa, J.F.: Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hockenmaier, J.: Data and Models for Statistical Parsing with Combinatory Categorial Grammar. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clark, S., Curran, J.R.: Wide-Coverage Efficient Statistical Parsing with CCG and Log-Linear Models. Computational Linguistics 33(4) (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peirce, C.S.: Manuscripts on existential graphs. In: Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 4, pp. 320–410. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1906)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Genest, D., Salvat, E.: A Platform Allowing Typed Nested Graphs: How CoGITo Became CoGITaNT. In: Mugnier, M.-L., Chein, M. (eds.) ICCS 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1453, p. 154. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chein, M., Mugnier, M.L.: Graph-based Knowledge Representation. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fatih Mehmet Güler
    • 1
  • Aysenur Birturk
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer EngineeringMETUAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations