Advertisement

Evaluation of a Method for Proactively Managing the Evolving Scope of a Software Product Line

  • Karina Villela
  • Jörg Dörr
  • Isabel John
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6182)

Abstract

[Context and motivation]PLEvo-Scoping is a method intended to help Product Line (PL) scoping teams anticipate emergent features and distinguish unstable from stable features, with the aim of preparing their PL for likely future adaptation needs. [Question/problem]This paper describes a quasi-experiment performed to characterize PLEvo-Scoping in terms of adequacy and feasibility. [Principal ideas/results] This quasi-experiment was performed by two scoping teams in charge of scoping the same PL, where one scoping team applied first an existing PL scoping approach and then PLEvo-Scoping, while the other scoping team interweaved activities from both. The two approaches achieved similar results: The method could be applied in just one day, and it was considered adequate and feasible. [Contribution] Ideas on how to improve the method and its tool support have been obtained, and similar results are expected from other professionals facing the problem of evolution-centered PL scoping. However, further empirical studies should be performed.

Keywords

Quasi-experiment Empirical Study Product Line Scoping Requirements Volatility Analysis Product Line Evolution Planning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Clements, P., Northrop, L.: Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pohl, K., Böckle, G., van der Linden, F.: Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles, and Techniques. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Knauber, P., Succi, G.: Perspectives on Software Product Lines. Software Engineering Notes 27(2), 40–45 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Savolainen, J., Kuusela, J.: Volatility Analysis Framework for Product Lines. In: Proc. SSR 2001, Toronto, pp. 133–141 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bayer, J., Flege, O., Knauber, P., et al.: PuLSE: A Methodology to Develop Software Product Lines. In: Proc. SSR 1999, Los Angeles, pp. 122–131 (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bengtsson, P., Lassing, N., Bosch, J., van Vliet, H.: Analyzing Software Architectures for Modifiability. TR HK-R-RES00/11-SE, University of Karlskrona/Ronneby. Ronneby (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schmid, K.: Planning Software Reuse – A Disciplined Scoping Approach for Software Product Lines. PhD Theses in Experimental Software Engineering. Fraunhofer IRB (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    John, I., Knodel, J., Lehner, T., et al.: A Practical Guide to Product Line Scoping. In: Proc. SPLC 2006, Baltimore, pp. 3–12 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Villela, K., Dörr, J., Gross, A.: Proactively Managing the Evolution of Embedded System Requirements. In: Proc. RE 2008, Barcelona, pp. 13–22 (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    John, I., Villela, K., Gross, A.: AAL Platform Product Line – Scoping Results and Recommendations. TR 074.09/E, Fraunhofer IESE, Kaiserslautern (2009) (available upon request)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zelkowitz, M., Wallace, D.: Experimental Models for Validating Technology. IEEE Computer 31(5), 23–31 (1998)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Basili, V., Caldiera, G., Rombach, H.: Goal Question Metrics Paradigm. Encyclopedia of Software Engineeering 1, 528–532 (1994)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Villela, K., John, I.: Usage of PLEvo-Scoping in the Ambient Assisted Living Domain: A Quasi-Experiment Package. TR 093.09/E, Fraunhofer IESE, Kaiserslautern (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., et al.: Experimentation in Software Engineering: An Introduction. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell (2000)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yin, R.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karina Villela
    • 1
  • Jörg Dörr
    • 1
  • Isabel John
    • 1
  1. 1.Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software EngineeringKaiserslauternGermany

Personalised recommendations