Advertisement

Mental Models of Menu Structures in Diabetes Assistants

  • André Calero Valdez
  • Martina Ziefle
  • Firat Alagöz
  • Andreas Holzinger
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6180)

Abstract

Demographic change in regard to an aging population with an increasing amount of diabetes patients will put a strain on health care rentability in all modern societies. Electronic living assistants for diabetes patients might help lift the burden on taxpayers, if they are usable for the heterogeneous user group. Research has shown that correct mental models of device menu structures might help users in handling electronic devices. This exploratory study investigates construction and facilitation of spatial mental models for a menu structure of a diabetes living assistant and relates them to performance in usage of a device. Furthemore impact of age, domain knowledge and technical expertise on complexity and quality of the mental model are evaluated. Results indicate that even having a simplified spatial representation of the menu structure increases navigation performance. Interestingly not the overall correctness of the model was important for task success but rather the amount of route knowledge within the model.

Keywords

HCI Mental Models eHealth Diabetes User Performance Menu Navigation Aging Assisted Living 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Siebert, H.: Economic Policy for Aging Societies. Springer, Berlin (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Federal Statistical Office Germany: Germany’s population until 2050 – 11th coordinated population projection, Wiesbaden (2006), http://www.destatis.de/
  3. 3.
    Arning, K., Ziefle, M.: Understanding age differences in PDA acceptance and performance. Computers in Human Behaviour 23, 2904–2927 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arning, K., Ziefle, M.: Barriers of information access in Small-Screen-Device applications: The relevance of user characteristics for a transgenerational design. In: Stephanidis, C., Pieper, M. (eds.) ERCIM Ws UI4ALL 2006. LNCS, vol. 4397, pp. 117–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leonhardt, S.: Personal Healthcare Devices. In: Mukherjee, S., et al. (eds.) AmIware: Hardware Technology Drivers of Ambient Intelligence, pp. 349–370. Springer, Dordrecht (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Holzinger, A.: Usability Engineering for Software Developers. Communications of the ACM 48(1), 71–74 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Holzinger, A., Searle, G., Kleinberger, T., Seffah, A., Javahery, H.: Investigating Usability Metrics for the Design and Development of Applications for the Elderly. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Karshmer, A. (eds.) ICCHP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5105, pp. 98–105. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nischelwitzer, A., Pintoffl, K., Loss, C., Holzinger, A.: Design and Development of a Mobile Medical Application for the Management of Chronic Diseases: Methods of improved Data Input for Older People. In: Holzinger, A. (ed.) USAB 2007. LNCS, vol. 4799, pp. 119–132. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Holzinger, A., Searle, G., Nischelwitzer, A.K.: On some Aspects of Improving Mobile Applications for the Elderly. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) HCI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4554, pp. 923–932. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ziefle, M., Bay, S.: How older adults meet complexity: aging effects on the usability of different mobile phones. Behaviour & Information Technology 24(5), 375–389 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ziefle, M., Bay, S.: How To Overcome Disorientation in Mobile Phone Menus: A Comparison of Two Different Types of Navigation Aids. Human-Computer Interaction 21, 393–433 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lin, D.M.: Age differences in the performance of hypertext perusal. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting, pp. 211–215. Human Factors Society, Santa Monica (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ziefle, M., Bay, S.: Mental Models of a Cellular Phone Menu. Comparing Older and Younger Novice. In: Brewster, S., Dunlop, M. (eds.) Category Theory Applied to Computation and Control. LNCS, pp. 25–37. Springer, Heidelberg (1975)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ziefle, M.: Aging and Mobile Displays: Challenges and requirements for age-sensitive electronic information designs. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Work With Computer Systems, WWCS 2009, Beijing, China (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Arning, K., Ziefle, M.: Assessing computer experience in older adults: Development and validation of a computer expertise questionnaire for older adults. Behaviour and Information Technology 27(1), 89–93 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Parush, A., Yuviler-Gavish, T.: Web navigation structures in cellular phones. The depth-breadth trade-off issue. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 60, 753–770 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Westermann, S.J.: Individual differences in the use of command line and menu computer interfaces. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction 9, 183–198 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Holzinger, A., Schaupp, K., Eder-Halbedl, W.: An Investigation on Acceptance of Ubiquitous Devices for the Elderly in an Geriatric Hospital Environment: using the Example of Person Tracking. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Karshmer, A. (eds.) ICCHP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5105, pp. 22–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gentner, D., Stevens, A.L.: Mental models. L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1983) (Gentner, D., Stevens, A.L. (eds.))Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sasse, A.: Cognitive Ergonomics and Human-Computer Interaction. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 35(2), 269–270 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Morrow, D., Miller, L.S., Ridolfo, H., Kokayeff, N., Chang, D., Fischer, U., Stine-Morrow, E.: Expertise and aging in a pilot decision making task. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual meeting, pp. 228–232 (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Calero-Valdez, A., Ziefle, M., Horstmann, A., Herding, D., Schroeder, U.: Effects of aging and domain knowledge on usability in small screen devices for diabetes patients. In: Holzinger, A. (ed.) USAB 2009. LNCS, vol. 5889, pp. 366–386. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thorndyke, Goldin: Spatial learning and reasoning skill. In: Pick, H.L., Acredolo, L.P. (eds.) Spatial orientation. Theory, research, and application, pp. 195–217. Plenum, New York (1983)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schroeder, U., Spannagel, C.: The Role of Interaction Records in Active Learning Processes. In: Isaias, P., Nunes, M.B., dos Reis, A.P. (eds.) Proceedings of the IADIS Virtual Multi Conference on Computational Information Systems, pp. 99–104; Behaviour 21, 195–209 (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Spannagel, C., Gläser-Zikuda, M., Schroeder, U.: Application of Qualitative Content Analysis in User-Program Interaction Research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(2) (2006), http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-05/05-2-29-e.htm

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • André Calero Valdez
    • 1
  • Martina Ziefle
    • 1
  • Firat Alagöz
    • 1
  • Andreas Holzinger
    • 2
  1. 1.Communication Science, Human Technology CentreRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation (IMI), Research Unit HCI4MEDMedical University of GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations