Advertisement

Beyond a Visuocentric Way of a Visual Web Search Clustering Engine: The Sonification of WhatsOnWeb

  • Maria Laura Mele
  • Stefano Federici
  • Simone Borsci
  • Giuseppe Liotta
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6179)

Abstract

It is widely accepted that spatial representation is processed by an amodal system. Recent studies show that blind subjects have a better motion ability than sighted people in performing spatial exploration guided only by auditory cues. The sonification method offers an effective tool able to transmit graphic information, overcoming the digital divide risen by a visuocentric modality in which contents are conveyed. We present a usability evaluation aiming at investigate the interaction differences between both blind and sighted users while surfing WhatsOnWeb, a search engine that displays the information by using graph-drawing methods on semantically clustered data. We compare the visual presentation of three different layouts with the sonificated ones, demonstrating both qualitatively and quantitatively that blind and sighted users perform with no significant differences the interaction. These results remark that the digital divide could be decreased by going beyond the visuocentric way of the commonly adopted visual content representation.

Keywords

Sonification Information visualization Accessibility Usability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    De Vega., M., Cocude, M., Denis, M., Rodrigo, M.J., Zimmer, H.: The interface between language and visuo-spatial representations. In: Denis, M., et al. (eds.) Imagery, Language and Visuo-spatial Thinking, pp. 109–136 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Avraamides, M., Loomis, J., Klatzky, R.L., Golledge, R.G.: Functional equivalence of spatial representations derived from vision and language: Evidence from allocentric judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning, Memory & Cognition 30, 801–814 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bryant, D.J.: A Spatial Representation System in Humans  3(16) (1992)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Millar, S.: Understanding and representing space: theory and evidence from studies with blind and sighted children. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Olivetti Belardinelli, M., Federici, S., Delogu, F., Palmiero, M.: Sonification of Spatial Information: Audio-tactile Exploration Strategies by Normal and Blind Subjects. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Universal Access in HCI, Part II, HCII 2009. LNCS, vol. 5615, pp. 557–563. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Delogu, F., Palmiero, M., Federici, S., Zhao, H., Plaisant, C., Olivetti Belardinelli, M.: Non-visual exploration of geographic maps: does sonification help? Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology (accept June 07, 2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kramer, G.: Auditory display: Sonification, audification, and auditory interfaces. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Auditory Display, ICAD 1992. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1994)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Di Giacomo, E., Didimo, W., Grilli, L., Liotta, G.: Graph Visualization Techniques for Web Meta-search Clustering Engines. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13(2), 294–304 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rugo, A., Mele, M.L., Liotta, G., Trotta, F., Di Giacomo, E., Borsci, S., Federici, S.: A Visual Sonificated Web Search Clustering Engine. Cognitive Processing 10(suppl. 2), 286–289 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Borsci, S., Federici, S., Mele, M.L., Stamerra, G.: Global Rank: improving a qualitative and inclusive level of web accessibility. In: 4th Biennial Disabilities study conference, CeDR, Lancaster University (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Borsci, S., Federici, S., Stamerra, G.: Web usability evaluation with screen reader users: Implementation of the Partial Concurrent Thinking Aloud technique. Cognitive Processing (accepted October 28, 2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ivory, M.Y., Yu, S., Gronemyer, K.: Search result exploration: a preliminary study of blind and sighted users’ decision making and performance. In: Extended abstracts of CHI 2004, pp. 1453–1456. ACM, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Federici, S., Borsci, S., Mele, M.L., Stamerra, G.: Web Popularity - An illusory perception of a qualitative order in information. Universal Access in the Information Society (accept June 07, 2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    International Organization for Standardization. International Standard ISO 13407:1999: Human-centred design processes for interactive systems (1999), http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=21197
  15. 15.
    IBM Rule-based Accessibility Validation Environment, http://www-03.ibm.com/able/resources/raven.html
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    Di Giacomo, E., Didimo, W., Grilli, L., Liotta, G., Palladino, P.: WhatsOnWeb+, an enhanced visual search clustering engine. In: Proceedings of the IEEE PacificVis., pp. 167–174 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kramer, G., Walker, B., Bonebright, T., Cook, P., Flowers, J., Miner, N., Neuhoff, J.: Sonification Report: Status of the Field and Research Agenda, International Community for Auditory Display (1997)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhao, H., Plaisant, C., Shneiderman, B., Lazar, J.: Data Sonification for Users with Visual Impairment: A Case Study with Georeferenced Data. ACM Trans. Computer-Human Interaction 15(1), 1–28 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Atkinson, R.C., Shiffrin, R.M.: The control of short-term memory. Scientific American, 82–90 (August 1971)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nielsen, J.: Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. In: Proc. ACM CHI 1994 Conf., Boston, MA, April 24-28, pp. 152–158 (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Borsci, S., Federici, S., Lauriola, M.: On the Dimensionality of the System Usability Scale (SUS): A Test of Alternative Measurement Models. Cognitive Processing 10(3), 193–197 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brooke, J.: SUS: a quick and dirty usability scale. In: Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B.A., McClelland, A.L. (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry (1996)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jay, C., Stevens, R., Glencross, M., Chalmers, A.: How people use presentation to search for a link: expanding the understanding of accessibility on the web. In: W4A 2006 (2006)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Anderson, J.R.: The architecture of cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1993)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Laura Mele
    • 1
  • Stefano Federici
    • 1
    • 2
  • Simone Borsci
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Liotta
    • 3
  1. 1.ECoNA - Interuniversity Centre for Research on Cognitive Processing in Natural, and Artificial Systems’Sapienza’ University of RomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of Human and Education SciencesUniversity of PerugiaItaly
  3. 3.Department of Electronic and Information EngineeringUniversity of PerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations