Advertisement

OMAN – A Management Architecture for P2P Service Overlay Networks

  • Adriano Fiorese
  • Paulo Simões
  • Fernando Boavida
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6155)

Abstract

In a world where networking services are increasingly being provided by service overlay networks, management of these services at overlay level is becoming crucially important. This paper presents an architecture for services management in P2P Service Overlay Networks (SON). The architecture, named OMAN, takes into account the formation of the P2P SON comprising several different service providers belonging to several different network domains. It uses P2P mechanisms to provide service search and service self-improvement through the monitoring of the P2P SON overlay and self-configuration. Preliminary results concerning service aggregation and service searching are presented in this paper, giving an insight into the expected benefits and providing proof of concept as well as pointing the overall potential of the OMAN architecture.

Keywords

Services Management P2P Service Overlays P2P SON 

References

  1. 1.
    Fan, J., Ammar, M.H.: Dynamic topology configuration in service overlay networks: A study of reconfiguration policies. In: Proceedings of 25th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, INFOCOM 2006, pp. 1–12 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liang, J., Gu, X., Nahrstedt, K.: Self-Configuring information management for Large-Scale service overlays. In: 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, INFOCOM 2007, pp. 472–480. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duan, Z., Zhang, Z., Hou, Y.T.: Service overlay networks: SLAs, QoS, and bandwidth provisioning. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 11(6), 870–883 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Machiraju, V., Sahai, A., Moorsel, A.V.: Web services management network - an overlay network for federated service management. In: IFIP/IEEE Eighth International Symposium on Integrated Network Management, pp. 351–364 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhou, S., Hogan, M., Ardon, S., Portman, M., Hu, T., Wongrujira, K., Seneviratne, A.: ALASA: when service overlay networks meet Peer-to-Peer networks. In: 2005 Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications, pp. 1053–1057 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lavinal, E., Simoni, N., Song, M., Mathieu, B.: A next-generation service overlay architecture. Annals of Telecommunications 64(3), 175–185 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Adam, C., Stadler, R., Tang, C., Steinder, M., Spreitzer, M.: A service middleware that scales in system size and applications. In: 10th IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management, IM 2007, pp. 70–79 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ratnasamy, S., Francis, P., Shenker, S., Karp, R., Handley, M.: A scalable Content-Addressable network. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, pp. 161–172 (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Crowcroft, J., Pias, M., Sharma, R., Lim, S., Lua, K.: A survey and comparison of peer-to-peer overlay network schemes. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 72–93 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Andersen, D., Balakrishnan, H., Kaashoek, F., Morris, R.: Resilient overlay networks. In: Proceedings of the eighteenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles, Banff, Alberta, Canada, pp. 131–145. ACM, New York (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fiorese, A., Simões, P., Boavida, F.: Service Searching based on P2P Aggregation. In: Proceedings of ICOIN 2010, Busan - South Korea (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hariri, S., Khargharia, B., Chen, H., Yang, J., Zhang, Y., Parashar, M., Liu, H.: The autonomic computing paradigm. Cluster Computing 9(1), 5–17 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stoica, I., Morris, R., Karger, D., Kaashoek, M.F., Balakrishnan, H.: Chord: A scalable peer-to-peer lookup service for internet applications. In: Proceedings of the 2001 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, San Diego, California, United States, pp. 149–160. ACM, New York (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adriano Fiorese
    • 1
    • 2
  • Paulo Simões
    • 1
  • Fernando Boavida
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Informatics Engineering - DEI, University of CoimbraCentre for Informatics and Systems of the University of Coimbra - CISUCPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science - DCCSanta Catarina State University - UDESCJoinvilleBrazil

Personalised recommendations