Context-Aware Interaction Approach to Handle Users Local Contexts in Web 2.0

  • Mohanad Al-Jabari
  • Michael Mrissa
  • Philippe Thiran
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6189)


Users sharing and authoring of Web contents via different Web sites is the main idea of the Web 2.0. However, Web users belong to different communities and follow their own semantics (referred to as local contexts) to represent and interpret Web contents. Therefore, they encounter discrepancies when they have to interpret Web contents authored by different persons. This paper proposes a context-aware interaction approach that helps Web authors annotate Web contents with their local context information, so that it becomes possible for Web browsers to personalize these contents according to different users’ local contexts.


Local Context Date Content Annotation Process Context Attribute Semantic Object 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Adida, B.: hGRDDL: Bridging microformats and RDFa. J. Web Sem. 6(1) (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Al-Jabari, M., Mrissa, M., Thiran, P.: Handling users local contexts in web 2.0: Use cases and challenges. In: AP WEB 2.0 International Workshop. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 485, pp. 11–20 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Al-Jabari, M., Mrissa, M., Thiran, P.: Towards web usability: Providing web contents according to the readers contexts. In: Houben, G.-J., McCalla, G., Pianesi, F., Zancanaro, M. (eds.) UMAP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5535, pp. 467–473. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barber, W., Badre, A.: Culturability: The merging of culture and usability. In: The 4th Conference on Human Factors and the Web (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Corcho, Ó.: Ontology based document annotation: trends and open research problems. IJMSO 1(1), 47–57 (2006)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Handschuh, S., Staab, S.: Authoring and annotation of web pages in CREAM. In: WWW, pp. 462–473 (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hori, M., Kondoh, G., Ono, K., Hirose, S., Singhal, S.K.: Annotation-based web content transcoding. Computer Networks 33(1-6), 197–211 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hyvönen, E., Mäkelä, E.: Semantic autocompletion. In: Mizoguchi, R., Shi, Z.-Z., Giunchiglia, F. (eds.) ASWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4185, pp. 739–751. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ishida, R.: Making the World Wide Web world wide. W3C internationalization activity, (last accessed: February 19, 2010)
  10. 10.
    Kahan, J., Koivunen, M.-R., Hommeaux, E.P., Swick, R.R.: Annotea: an open RDF infrastructure for shared web annotations. Computer Networks 39(5) (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kettler, B.P., Starz, J., Miller, W., Haglich, P.: A template-based markup tool for semantic web content. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 446–460. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Luczak-Roesch, R.H.M.: Linked data authoring for non-experts. In: Proceedings of the WWW ’09, Workshop Linked Data on the Web, LDOW 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reinecke, K., Bernstein, A.: Culturally adaptive software: Moving beyond internationalization. In: Aykin, N. (ed.) HCII 2007. LNCS, vol. 4560, pp. 201–210. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Troyer, O.D., Casteleyn, S.: Designing localized web sites. In: Zhou, X., Su, S., Papazoglou, M.P., Orlowska, M.E., Jeffery, K. (eds.) WISE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3306, pp. 547–558. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Valkeapää, O., Alm, O., Hyvönen, E.: An adaptable framework for ontology-based content creation on the semantic web. J. UCS 13(12), 1835 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohanad Al-Jabari
    • 1
  • Michael Mrissa
    • 2
  • Philippe Thiran
    • 1
  1. 1.PReCISE Research CenterUniversity of NamurBelgium
  2. 2.Université de Lyon, CNRS, Université Lyon 1, LIRIS, UMR5205France

Personalised recommendations