Reconciling Knowledge in Social Tagging Web Services

  • Gonzalo A. Aranda-Corral
  • Joaquín Borrego-Díaz
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6077)

Abstract

Sometimes we want to search for new information about topics but we can not find relevant results using our own knowledge (for example, our personal bookmarks). A potential solution could be the use of knowledge from other users to find what we are searching for. This solution implies that we can achieve some agreement on implicit semantics used by the other users. We call it Reconciliation of Knowledge. The aim of this paper is to show an agent-based method which lets us reconcile two different knowledge basis (associated with tagging systems) into a common language, obtaining a new one that allows the reconcilitiation of (part of) this knowledge. The agents use Formal Concept Analysis concepts and tools and it has been implemented on the JADE multiagent platform.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alonso-Jiménez, J.A., Aranda-Corral, G.A., Borrego-Díaz, J., Fernández-Lebrón, M.M., Hidalgo-Doblado, M.J.: Extending Attribute Exploration by Means of Boolean Derivatives. In: Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Concept Lattices and Their Applications. CEUR Workshops Proc., p. 433 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aranda-Corral, G.A., Borrego-Díaz, J., Gómez-Marín, F.: Toward Semantic Mobile Web 2.0 through Multiagent Systems. In: Håkansson, A., Nguyen, N.T., Hartung, R.L., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES-AMSTA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5559, pp. 400–409. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yeung, C.M.A., Gibbins, N., Shadbolt, N.: Contextualising Tags in Collaborative Tagging Systems. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ganter, B., Wille, R.: Formal Concept Analysis - Mathematical Foundations. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Golder, S., Huberman, B.A.: The structure of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science 32(2), 98–208 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gruber, T.: Ontology of Folksonomy: A Mash-up of Apples and Oranges. Int’l. Journal on Semantic Web & Information Systems 3(2) (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jäschke, R., Hotho, A., Schmitz, C., Ganter, B., Stumme, G.: Discovering shared conceptualizations in folksonomies. Journal of Web Semantics 6(1), 38–53 (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim, H.-L., Scerri, S., Breslin, J., Decker, S., Kim, H.-G.: The state of the art in tag ontologies: A semantic model for tagging and folksonomies. In: International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, Germany (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Knerr, T.: Tagging ontology- towards a common ontology for folksonomies (2006), http://tagont.googlecode.com/files/TagOntPaper.pdf (June 14, 2008)
  10. 10.
    Smith, G.: 2007 Tagging: People-Powered Metadata for the Social Web. First. New Riders Publishing, Indianapolis (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tanaka, J.W., Taylor, M.: Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? Cognitive Psychology 23(3), 457–482 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van Damme, C., Hepp, M., Siorpaes, K.: FolksOntology: An Integrated Approach for Turning Folksonomies into Ontologies. In: ESWC 2007 workshop Bridging the Gap between Semantic Web and Web 2.0, May 2007, pp. 57–70 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weick, K.E., Sutcliffe, K.M., Obstfeld, D.: Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking. Organization Science 16(4), 409–421 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gonzalo A. Aranda-Corral
    • 1
  • Joaquín Borrego-Díaz
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Information TechnologyUniversidad de HuelvaPalos de La Frontera
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and Artificial IntelligenceUniversidad de SevillaSevillaSpain

Personalised recommendations