Model Migration with Epsilon Flock

  • Louis M. Rose
  • Dimitrios S. Kolovos
  • Richard F. Paige
  • Fiona A. C. Polack
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6142)


In their recent book, Mens and Demeyer state that Model-Driven Engineering introduces additional challenges for controlling and managing software evolution. Today, tools exist for generating model editors and for managing models with transformation, validation, merging and weaving. There is limited support, however, for model migration - a development activity in which instance models are updated in response to metamodel evolution. In this paper, we describe Epsilon Flock, a model-to-model transformation language tailored for model migration that contributes a novel algorithm for relating source and target model elements. To demonstrate its conciseness, we compare Flock to other approaches.


Model Migration Migration Strategy Transformation Language Concrete Syntax Eclipse Modeling Framework 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Cicchetti, A., Di Ruscio, D., Eramo, R., Pierantonio, A.: Automating co-evolution in MDE. In: Proc. EDOC, pp. 222–231. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Czarnecki, K., Helsen, S.: Feature-based survey of model transformation approaches. IBM Systems Journal 45(3), 621–646 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eclipse. Generative Modelling Technologies project (2008), (accessed June 30, 2008)
  4. 4.
    Eclipse. UML2 Model Development Tools project (2009), (accessed September 7, 2009)
  5. 5.
    Garcés, K., Jouault, F., Cointe, P., Bézivin, J.: Managing model adaptation by precise detection of metamodel changes. In: Paige, R.F., Hartman, A., Rensink, A. (eds.) ECMDA-FA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5562, pp. 34–49. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gronback, R.: Introduction to the Eclipse Graphical Modeling Framework. In: Proc. EclipseCon, Santa Clara, California (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Herrmannsdoerfer, M., Benz, S., Juergens, E.: COPE - automating coupled evolution of metamodels and models. In: Drossopoulou, S. (ed.) ECOOP 2009 – Object-Oriented Programming. LNCS, vol. 5653, pp. 52–76. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hussey, K., Paternostro, M.: Advanced features of EMF. Tutorial at EclipseCon 2006, California, USA (2006), (accessed September 07, 2009)
  9. 9.
    Jouault, F., Kurtev, I.: Transforming models with ATL. In: Bruel, J.-M. (ed.) MoDELS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3844, pp. 128–138. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kolovos, D.S.: An Extensible Platform for Specification of Integrated Languages for Model Management. PhD thesis, University of York, United Kingdom (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kolovos, D.S., Paige, R.F., Polack, F.A.C.: The Epsilon Object Language (EOL). In: Rensink, A., Warmer, J. (eds.) ECMDA-FA 2006. LNCS, vol. 4066, pp. 128–142. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kolovos, D.S., Paige, R.F., Polack, F.A.C.: The Epsilon Transformation Language. In: Vallecillo, A., Gray, J., Pierantonio, A. (eds.) ICMT 2008. LNCS, vol. 5063, pp. 46–60. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mens, T., Demeyer, S.: Software Evolution. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Oldevik, J., Neple, T., Grønmo, R., Øyvind Aagedal, J., Berre, A.: Toward standardised model to text transformations. In: Hartman, A., Kreische, D. (eds.) ECMDA-FA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3748, pp. 239–253. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Paige, R.F., Brooke, P.J., Ostroff, J.S.: Metamodel-based model conformance and multiview consistency checking. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 16(3) (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rose, L.M., Kolovos, D.S., Paige, R.F., Polack, F.A.C.: An analysis of approaches to model migration. In: Proc. Joint MoDSE-MCCM Workshop (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rose, L.M., Kolovos, D.S., Paige, R.F., Polack, F.A.C.: Enhanced automation for managing model and metamodel inconsistency. In: Proc. ASE 2009, pp. 545–549. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Steinberg, D., Budinsky, F., Paternostro, M., Merks, E.: EMF: Eclipse Modeling Framework. Addison-Wesley Professional, Reading (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wachsmuth, G.: Metamodel adaptation and model co-adaptation. In: Ernst, E. (ed.) ECOOP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4609, pp. 600–624. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louis M. Rose
    • 1
  • Dimitrios S. Kolovos
    • 1
  • Richard F. Paige
    • 1
  • Fiona A. C. Polack
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of YorkUK

Personalised recommendations