Breast Shapes on Real and Simulated Mammograms
We investigate the need for anisotropic materials when simulating X-ray mammograms from real 3D MR breast images employing biomechanical models. We previously observed on 3D MRI that the breast in the prone position elongates very little in the anterior-posterior direction even when applying large lateral-to-medial compressions. Improved accuracy was achieved for these 3D deformations when employing transverse-isotropic materials, where the tissue in anterior-posterior direction was stiffer than in the other two directions. We investigate here whether this also holds when simulating cranio-caudal mammograms where the patient is standing. The realism of the simulated breast compressions was judged by comparing the anterior breast shapes of simulated and real mammograms. The anterior breast shape was quantified by the log ratio of the medial-lateral to anterior-posterior diameter of an ellipse fitted to the anterior breast edge. The breast shapes on real and simulated mammograms were on average statistically significantly different (0.48 versus 0.27, P<0.01) when employing isotropic materials. No such difference was observed for transverse-isotropic materials (0.47). The estimated breast thickness, to achieve the breast shape observed on the corresponding real mammogram, was on average very unrealistic for isotropic materials (8.7 mm) while reasonable for anisotropic materials (49.5 mm).
KeywordsIsotropic Material Anisotropic Material Digital Mammogram Breast Shape Breast Thickness
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Chung, J., Rajagopal, V., Nielsen, P., Nash, M.P.: Modelling Mammographic Compression of the Breast. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, p. 758 (2008)Google Scholar
- 5.Krouskop, T.A., Wheeler, T.M., Kallel, F., Garra, B.S., Hall, T.: Elastic Moduli of Breast and Prostate Tissues Under Compression. Ultrasonic Imaging 20, 260–274 (1998)Google Scholar
- 6.Leach, M., Boggis, C., Dixon, A., Easton, D., Eeles, R., Evans, D., Gilbert, F., Griebsch, I., Hoff, R., Kessar, P., et al.: Screening with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Mammography of a UK Population at High Family Risk of Breast Cancer: A Prospective Multicentre Cohort Study (MARIBS). The Lancet 365, 1769–1778 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Pathmanathan, P., Gavaghan, D., Whiteley, J., Brady, M., Nash, M., Nielsen, P., Rajagopal, V.: Predicting Tumour Location by Simulating Large Deformations of the Breast Using a 3D Finite Element Model and Nonlinear Elasticity. In: Barillot, C., Haynor, D.R., Hellier, P. (eds.) MICCAI 2004. LNCS, vol. 3217, pp. 217–224. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
- 9.Ruiter, N.V.: Registration of X-ray Mammograms and MR-Volumes of the Female Breast based on Simulated Mammographic Deformation. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Mannheim (2003)Google Scholar
- 12.Sarvazyan, A., Goukassian, D., Maevsky, E., Oranskaja, G.: Elastic Imaging as a New Modality of Medical Imaging for Cancer Detection. In: Proc. Int. Workshop on Interaction of Ultrasound with Biological Media, Valenciennes, France, pp. 69–81 (1994)Google Scholar
- 14.Tanner, C., White, M., Guarino, S., Hall-Craggs, M.A., Douek, M., Hawkes, D.J.: Anisotropic Behaviour of Breast Tissue for Large Compressions. In: Proc. Int. Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, pp. 1223–1226 (2009)Google Scholar
- 16.Wellman, P.S.: Tactile Imaging. Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University (1999)Google Scholar
- 17.Yin, H.M., Sun, L.Z., Wang, G., Yamada, T., Wang, J., Vannier, M.W.: ImageParser: A Tool for Finte Element Generation from Three-Dimensional Medical Images. BioMedical Engineering OnLine 3(31) (2004)Google Scholar
- 18.Young, K.C., Burch, A.: Radiation Doses received in the UK Breast Screening Programme in 1997 and 1998. The British Journal of Radiology 73, 278–287 (2000)Google Scholar