Advertisement

Adding Abstraction and Reuse to a Network Modelling Tool Using the Reuseware Composition Framework

  • Jendrik Johannes
  • Miguel A. Fernández
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6138)

Abstract

Domain-specific modelling (DSM) environments enable experts in a certain domain to actively participate in model-driven development. Developing DSM environments need to be cost-efficient, since they are only used by a limited group of domain experts. Different model-driven technologies promise to allow this cost-efficient development. [1] presented experiences in developing a DSM environment for telecommunication network modelling. There, challenges were identified that need to be addressed by other new modelling technologies. In this paper, we now present the results of addressing one of theses challenges—abstraction and reuse support—with the Reuseware Composition Framework. We show how we identified the abstraction and reuse features required in the telecommunication DSM environment in a case study and extended the existing environment with these features using Reuseware. We discuss the advantages of using this technology and propose a process for further improving the abstraction and reuse capabilities of the DSM environment in the future.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Evans, A., Fernández, M.A., Mohagheghi, P.: Experiences of Developing a Network Modeling Tool Using the Eclipse Environment. In: Paige, R.F., Hartman, A., Rensink, A. (eds.) ECMDA-FA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5562. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gronback, R.C.: Eclipse Modeling Project: A Domain-Specific Language (DSL) Toolkit. Pearson Education, London (April 2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aßmann, U.: Invasive Software Composition, April 2003. Springer, Heidelberg (April 2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heidenreich, F., Henriksson, J., Johannes, J., Zschaler, S.: On Language-Independent Model Modularisation. In: Katz, S., Ossher, H., France, R., Jézéquel, J.-M. (eds.) Transactions on Aspect-Oriented Software Development VI. LNCS, vol. 5560. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Henriksson, J.: A Lightweight Framework for Universal Fragment Composition—with an application in the Semantic Web. PhD thesis, TU Dresden (January 2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Steinberg, D., Budinsky, F., Paternostro, M., Merks, E.: Eclipse Modeling Framework, 2nd edn. Pearson Education, London (January 2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Distributed Management Task Force Inc. (DMTF): Common Information Model Standards (January 2010), http://www.dmtf.org/standards/cim
  8. 8.
    Object Management Group: MOF 2.0 Core Specification (January 2006), http://www.omg.org/spec/MOF/2.0
  9. 9.
    MODELPLEX Project: Deliverable D1.1.a (v3): Case Study Scenario Definitions (March 2008), http://www.modelplex.org
  10. 10.
    Heidenreich, F., Johannes, J., Karol, S., Seifert, M., Wende, C.: Derivation and Refinement of Textual Syntax for Models. In: Paige, R.F., Hartman, A., Rensink, A. (eds.) ECMDA-FA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5562. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kolovos, D.S., Rose, L.M., Paige, R.F., Polack, F.A.: Raising the Level of Abstraction in the Development of GMF-based Graphical Model Editors. In: Proc. of 3rd MISE Workshop @ ICSE (May 2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johannes, J., Zschaler, S., Fernández, M.A., Castillo, A., Kolovos, D.S., Paige, R.F.: Abstracting Complex Languages through Transformation and Composition. In: Schürr, A., Selic, B. (eds.) MODELS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5795. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jendrik Johannes
    • 1
  • Miguel A. Fernández
    • 2
  1. 1.Technische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Broadband Service PlatformsTelefónica R&DValladolidSpain

Personalised recommendations