Integrating Sophisticated Domain-Independent Pedagogical Behaviors in an ITS Framework

  • Luc Paquette
  • Jean-François Lebeau
  • André Mayers
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6095)


ITS authoring frameworks are useful to reduce the efforts needed to create tutors, but the resulting tutors are usually more limited than domain-specific ones. The sophistication of the pedagogical behaviors they can produce depends on the knowledge components available to model a task domain. In this paper, we present research focused on integrating sophisticated domain-independent pedagogical behaviors in an ITS framework.


Problem-solving ITS Pedagogical behavior Well-defined domains 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Anderson, J.R., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., Pelletier, R.: Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 4(2), 167–207 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    VanLehn, K., Lynch, C., Schulze, K., Shapiro, J.A., Shelby, R., Taylor, L., Treacy, D., Weinstein, A., Wintersgill, M.: The Andes Physics Tutoring System: Lessons Learned. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 15(3), 1–47 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mitrovic, A., Suraweera, P., Martin, B., Zaharov, K., Milik, N., Holland, J.: Authoring Constraint-Based Tutors in ASPIRE. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, T.-W. (eds.) ITS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4053, pp. 41–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aleven, V., McLaren, B.M., Sewall, J., Koedinger, K.R.: A New Paradigm for Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Example-Tracing Tutors. IJAIED, Special Issue on Authoring Systems for Intelligent Tutoring Systemes, 105–154 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    VanLehn, K.: The Behavior of Tutoring Systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 16(3), 227–265 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paquette, L., Lebeau, J.-F., Mayers, A.: Authoring Problem-Solving Tutors: A Comparison Between ASTUS and CTAT using the Mutli-Columns Subtraction Task Domain. In: Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Springer, Heidelberg (to appear)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lebeau, J.-F., Fortin, M., Paquette, L., Mayers, A.: From Cognitive to Pedagogical Knowledge Models in Problem-Solving ITS Frameworks. In: Dimitrova, V., Mizoguchi, R., du Boulay, B., Graesser, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 731–733 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fortin, M., Lebeau, J.-F., Abdessemed, A., Courtemanche, F., Mayers, A.: A Standard Method of Developing User Interfaces for a Generic ITS Framework. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds.) ITS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5091, pp. 312–322. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barnes, T., Stamper, J.: Toward Automatic Hint Generation for Logic Proof Tutoring Using Historical Student Data. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 373–382. Springer, Berlin (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lebeau, J.-F., Paquette, L., Fortin, M., Mayers, A.: An Authoring Language as a Key to Usability in a Problem-Solving ITS Framework (YRT). In: ITS (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luc Paquette
    • 1
  • Jean-François Lebeau
    • 1
  • André Mayers
    • 1
  1. 1.Université de SherbrookeCanada

Personalised recommendations