Model-Driven Quality Engineering of Service-Based Systems

  • Andrea D’Ambrogio
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 2)


Web services are the building blocks of systems based on service-oriented architectures. A web service is a self-describing, open component that supports rapid composition of distributed applications. Web service definitions are used to describe the service capabilities in terms of the operations of the service and the input and output messages for each operation. Such definitions are expressed in XML by use of the Web Service Definition Language (WSDL). Unfortunately, a WSDL description only addresses the functional aspects of a web service without containing any useful description of non-functional or quality of service (QoS) characteristics. This paper introduces a lightweight WSDL extension for the description of QoS characteristics of a web service. The extension is carried out as a metamodel transformation, according to principles and standards recommended by the Model Driven Architecture (MDA). The WSDL metamodel is introduced and then transformed into the Q-WSDL (QoS-enabled WSDL) metamodel. As an example application of Q-WSDL, the paper illustrates a model-driven method that exploits Q-WSDL in order to automatically predict and describe the QoS of systems based on composite web services specified by use of the Business Process Execution Language for Web Services (BPEL). The paper specifically addresses the prediction of the reliability attribute of QoS and is illustrated by use of an example application to a composite web service for travel planning.


QoS service-oriented architectures WSDL BPEL UML model-driven prediction 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alonso, G., Casati, F., Kuno, H., Machiraju, V.: Web Services. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Bezivin, J., Hammoudi, S., Lopes, D., Jouault, F.: An Experiment in Mapping Web Services to Implementation Platforms, Atlas Group, INRIA and LINA University of Nantes. Research Report (2004)Google Scholar
  3. Bordbar, B., Staikopoulos, A.: Automated Generation of Metamodels for Web service Languages. In: Proceedings of the Second European Workshop on Model Driven Architecture (MDA), Canterbury, UK, September 7–8 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. Box, D., Curbera, F., Hondo, M., Kale, C., Langworthy, D., Nadalin, A., Nagaratnam, N., Nottingham, M., von Riegen, C., Shewchuk, J.: Web Services Policy Framework, WS-Policy (2003),
  5. Canfora, G., Di Penta, M., Esposito, R., Villani, M.L.: QoS-Aware Replanning of Composite Web Services. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 2005), Orlando, Florida, USA, July 11-15 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. Cardoso, J., Sheth, A.P., Miller, J.A., Arnold, J., Kochut, K.: Quality of service for workflows and web service processes. Journal of Web Semantics 1(3), 281–308 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. Catania, N., Kumar, P., Murray, B., Pourhedari, H., Vambenepe, W., Wurster, K.: Web Services Management Framework, Version 2.0, Hewlett-Packard (2003),
  8. Chappell, D.: Enterprise Service Bus. O’Reilly, Sebastopol (2004)Google Scholar
  9. D’Ambrogio, A.: A Model Transformation Framework for the Automated Building of Performance Models from UML Models. In: Proceedings of the ACM Fifth International Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP 2005), Palma de Mallorca, Spain, July 11-15 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. D’Ambrogio, A.: A Model-driven WSDL Extension for Describing the QoS of Web Services. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 2006), Chicago, USA, September 18-22 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. D’Ambrogio, A., Bocciarelli, P.: A Model-driven Approach to Describe and Predict the Performance of Composite Services. In: Proceedings of the ACM Sixth International Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP 2007), Buenos Aires, Argentina, February 5-8 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. Frankel, D., Parodi, J.: Using Model-Driven Architecture to Develop Web Services, IONA Technologies PLC White Paper, 2nd edn. (2002)Google Scholar
  13. Gardner, T.: UML Modelling of Automated Business Processes with a Mapping to BPEL. In: First European Workshop on Object Orientation and Web Services (in conjunction with ECOOP 2003), Darmstad, Germany (2003),
  14. IBM, IBM, BPEL – Business Process Execution Language for Web Services, version 1.1 (2003)Google Scholar
  15. ISO, International Organization for Standardization, CD15935 Information Technology: Open Distributed Processing - Reference Model - Quality of Service, ISO document ISO/IEC JTC1/ SC7N1996 (1998)Google Scholar
  16. Ludwig, H.: Web Services QoS: External SLAs and Internal Policies - Or: How do we deliver what we promise? In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering, WISE 2003 Workshops, Roma, Italy, December 13 (2003)Google Scholar
  17. Ludwig, H., Keller, A., Dan, A., King, R., Franck, R.: Web Service Level Agreement (WSLA) Language Specification, Version 1.0, IBM Corporation (2003),
  18. Lyu, M.R.: Handbook of Software Reliability Engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  19. Martin, D., Burstein, M., Lassila, O., Paolucci, M., Payne, T., McIlraith, S.: Describing Web Services using OWL-S and WSDL (2004),
  20. Mellor, S.J., Clark, A.N., Futagami, T.: Model-driven development. IEEE Software Special Issue 20(5) (2003)Google Scholar
  21. Menascé, D.A.: QoS Issues in Web Services. IEEE Internet Computing, 72–75 (November/December 2002)Google Scholar
  22. Menascé, D.A., Almeida, V.A.F.: Capacity Planning for Web Services: Metrics, Models and Methods. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2001)Google Scholar
  23. OMGmda, Object Management Group, MDA Guide, version 1.0.1 (2003)Google Scholar
  24. OMGmof. Object Management Group, Meta Object Facility (MOF) Specification, version 1.4. (2002)Google Scholar
  25. OMGqos, Object Management Group, UML Profile for Modeling Quality of Service and Fault Tolerance Characteristics and Mechanisms, Adopted Specification (2005)Google Scholar
  26. OMGqvt, Object Management Group, Meta Object Facility (MOF) 2.0 Query/View/Transformation Specification, Final Adopted Specification (2005)Google Scholar
  27. OMGspt, Object Management Group, UML Profile for Schedulability, Performance and Time Specification, v. 1.1 (2005)Google Scholar
  28. OMGuml, Object Management Group, Unified Modeling Language (UML): Superstructure, version 2.0 (2005)Google Scholar
  29. OMGxmi, Object Management Group, XML Metadata Interchange (XMI) Specification, version 2.0 (2003)Google Scholar
  30. Papazoglou, M.P., Georgakopoulos, D.: Service-oriented computing. Communications of the ACM 46(10), 25–28 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peltz, C.: Web Services Orchestration and Choreography. IEEE Computer 36, 46–52 (2003)Google Scholar
  32. Smith, R.M., Trivedi Kishor, S., Ramesh, A.V.: Performability Analysis: Measures, an Algorithm, and a Case Study. IEEE Transactions on Computers 37(4), 406–417 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tian, M., Gramm, A., Ritter, H., Schiller, J.: A Survey of current Approaches towards Specification and Management of Quality of Service for Web Services. PIK Journal 3, 132–139 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34., ArgoUML User Manual v0.22 (2006),
  35. Tosic, V., Pagurek, B., Patel, K.: WSOL A Language for the Formal Specification of Classes of Service for Web Services. In: Jeckle, M., Zhang, L.-J. (eds.) ICWS-Europe 2003. LNCS, vol. 2853, pp. 375–381. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar
  36. Verma, K., Sivashanmugam, K., Sheth, A., Patil, A., Oundhakar, S., Miller, J.: METEOR-S WSDI: A scalable P2P infrastructure of registries for semantic publication and discovery of web services. Inf. Tech. and Management 6(1), 17–39 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. W3C, WWW Consortium, XML Schema, W3C Recommendation XML/Schema (2004),
  38. W3C, WWW Consortium, Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0, W3C Working Draft (2006),
  39. Weerawarana, S., Curbera, F., Leymann, F., Storey, T., Ferguson, D.: Web Services Platform Architecture: SOAP, WSDL, WS-Policy, WS-Addressing, WS-BPEL, WS-Reliable Messaging, and More. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2005)Google Scholar
  40. Whittaker, J.A., Thomason, M.G.: A Markov Chain Model for Statistical Software Testing. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 20(10), 812–824 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wohed, P., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: Analysis of Web Services Composition Languages, The Case of BPEL4WS. In: Song, I.-Y., Liddle, S.W., Ling, T.-W., Scheuermann, P. (eds.) ER 2003. LNCS, vol. 2813, pp. 200–215. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zeng, L., Benatallah, B., Ngu, A.H., Dumas, M., Kalagnanam, J.: QoS-Aware Middleware for Web Services Composition. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 30(5) (May 2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea D’Ambrogio
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. Computer Science S&PUniversity of Roma “Tor Vergata”RomaItaly

Personalised recommendations