The IT-CMF: A Practical Application of Design Science

  • Brian Donnellan
  • Markus Helfert
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6105)

Abstract

The IT-Capability Maturity Model [IT-CMF] is a high-level process capability maturity framework for managing the IT function within an organization. The purpose of this paper is to explore and explain the IT-CMF as a “ method meta-model” for IT management, emphasizing the novel approach to addressing the application of design processes and design artifacts by means of a very structured use of engaged scholarship and open innovation techniques to the ongoing challenge of managing organization’s IT capability.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Curley, M.: Managing Information Technology for Business Value. Intel Press (January 2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Curley, M.: A Value Based IT Capability Maturity Framework. Intel EMEA Academic Forum, Ireland (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Curley, M.: IT Innovation, a new Era. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of Computational Science, Reading, UK (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–105 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schön, D.A.: The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New York (1983)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vaishnavi, V., Kuechler, W.: Design Research in Information Systems (January 20, 2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Klein, H.K., Myers, M.: Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies. MIS Quarterly 23(1) (March 1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nunamaker, J., et al.: Electronic Meeting Systems to Support Group Work. Communications of the ACM 34(7), 40–61 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brinkkemper, S.: Method engineering: engineering of information systems development methods and tools. Information and Software Technology 38(4), 275–280 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gericke, et al.: Situational Method Engineering for Governance, Risk and Compliance Information Systems. In: DESRIST 2009, Malvern, PA, May 7–8 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bucher, T., et al.: Situational Method Engineering – On the Differentiation of “Context” and “Project Type”. In: Ralyté, J., Brinkkemper, S., Henderson-Sellers, B. (eds.) IFIP WG8.1 Working Conference on Situational Method Engineering (ME 2007), Geneva, pp. 33–48 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mettler, T., Rohner, P.: Situational Maturity Models as Instrumental Artifacts for Organizational Design. In: DESRIST 2009, Malvern, PA, May 7–8 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Van de Ven, A.H.: Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chesbrough, H.: Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Recker, J., et al.: Model-Driven Enterprise Systems Configuration. In: 18th Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering. Springer, Luxembourg (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian Donnellan
    • 1
  • Markus Helfert
    • 2
  1. 1.National University of Ireland, MaynoothCounty KildareIreland
  2. 2.Dublin City UniversityDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations