Instruction Manual Usage: A Comparison of Younger People, Older People and People with Cognitive Disabilities

  • Abdusselam Selami Cifter
  • Hua Dong
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6105)

Abstract

When people are faced with new products for the first time or require assistance using features, the instruction manual is a key information source and therefore the design of instruction manuals is as important as the design of the product itself. There are often situations where the design embedded in the product is not sufficient to express its usage to the user. In addition, users differ significantly from each other in terms of their needs, expectations and capabilities. The main question is “are instruction manuals accessible enough and do they consider a variety of user groups?” This paper investigates the differences between three user groups (i.e. younger people, older people and people with cognitive disabilities) regarding their approach to understanding of instruction manuals. An experimental study was carried out testing thirty volunteer participants from the aforementioned user groups, using two digital products from two different market segments and their instruction manuals.

Keywords

Instruction Manuals Older People Disabled People User Characteristics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Backinger, C.L., Kingsley, P.A.: Write It Right: Recommendations for Developing User Instruction Manuals for Medical Devices Used in Home Health Care. FDA (1993)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baskinger, M., Hanington, B.: Sustaining Autonomous Living for Older People Through Inclusive Strategies for Home Appliance Design. In: Langdon, P., Clarkson, J., Robinson, P. (eds.) Designing Inclusive Futures, pp. 117–126. Springer, London (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bauer, M., Gaskell, G.: Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound. Sage Publications, London (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Braddock, D., Rizzolo, M.C., Thompson, M., Bell, R.: Emerging Technologies and Cognitive Disability. Journal of Special Education Technology 19, 49–56 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    BS 7000-6:2005: Design Management Systems-Part 6: Managing Inclusive Design-Guide, British Standards Institute (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clarkson, J., Coleman, R., Hosking, I., Waller, S.: Inclusive Design Toolkit, Kall Kwik Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coleman, R., Clarkson, J., Dong, H., Cassim, J.: Design for Inclusivity. Gower Publishing Ltd., England (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Czaja, R., Blair, J.: Designing Surveys: A Guide to Decisions and Procedures. Sage Publications, Pine Forge Press, London (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dong, H.: Barriers to Inclusive Design in the UK. PhD Thesis, Cambridge, Department of Engineering (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eisma, R., Dickinson, A., Goodman, J., Syme, A., Tiwari, L., Newell, A.F.: Early User Involvement in the Development of Information Technology-Related Products for Older People. Universal Access in the Information Society, vol. 3, pp. 131–140 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    French, S.: Dimensions of Disability and Impairment. In: French, S. (ed.) On Equal Terms: Working with Disabled People, pp. 17–34. Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., Oxford (1994)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gardill, M.C., Jitendra, A.K.: Advanced Story Map Instruction: Effects on the Reading Comprehension of Students with Learning Disabilities. The Journal of Special Education 33, 2–17 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gersten, R., Fuchs, L.S., Williams, P.J., Baker, S.: Teaching Reading Comprehension Strategies to Students with Learning Disabilities: A Review of Research. Review of Educational Research 71, 279–320 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gupta, S.: Design and Delivery of Medical Devices for Home-Use: Drivers and Challenges. Cambridge, Department of Engineering (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hawthorn, D.: Interface Design and Engagement with Older People. Behaviour & Information Technology 26, 333–341 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Heskett, J.: Design: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Horen, F.M., Jansen, C., Meas, A., Noordman, L.G.M.: Manuals for the Elderly: Which Information Cannot Be Missed. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 31, 415–431 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Horen, F., Jansen, C., Noordman, L., Maes, A.: Manuals for the Elderly: Text Characteristics That Help or Hinder Older Users. In: 2005 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference Proceedings, International, July 10-13, pp. 334–342 (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huppert, F.: Designing for Older Users. In: Clarkson, J., Coleman, R., Keates, S., Lebbon, C. (eds.) Inclusive Design: Design for the Whole Population, pp. 88–103. Springer, London (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Instruction Manual DSC-S730 Sony Cyber-shot Digital Camera: Sony Corporation (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Instruction Manual R7 Omron Automatic Blood Pressure Monitor. Omron Healthcase. Co. LtdGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Keates, S., Clarkson, J.: Design Exclusion. In: Clarkson, J., Coleman, R., Keates, S., Lebbon, C. (eds.) Inclusive Design: Design for the Whole Population, pp. 88–103. Springer, London (2003)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Langdon, P., Lewis, T., Clarkson, J.: The Effects of Prior Experience on the Use of Consumer Products. Universal Access in the Information Society, vol. 6, pp. 179–191 (2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Margolin, V.: Getting know the user. Design Studies 18, 227–236 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    McKinney, J.D.: The Search for Subtypes of Specific Learning Disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities 17, 43–50 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Myerson, J.: A Growing Movement. In: Coleman, R., Clarkson, J., Dong, H., Cassim, J. (eds.) Design for Inclusivity, pp. 23–31. Gower Publishing Ltd., England (2007)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Robson, C.: Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers. Blackwell Publishing, Malden (2002)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Smith, T.P.: Manufacturer’s Guide to Developing Consumer Product Instructions. US Consumer Product Safety Commission (2003)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    The Department of Trade and Industry: Instructions for Consumer Products: Guidelines for Better Instructions and Safety Information for Consumer Products. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London (1989)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Thompson, C.W.: Rizzolo: Smart Devices and Soft Controllers. IEEE Internet Computing 9, 82–85 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Valett, R.E.: Programming Learning Disabilities. Fearon Publishers (1969)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vanderheiden, G.: Fundamental Principles and Priority Settings for Universal Usability. In: Proceedings of the ACM Universal Usability Conference, Washington, DC, pp. 32–38 (2000)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wiklund, M., Wilcox, S.: Designing Usability into Medical Products. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wright, P.: Supportive Documentation for Older People. In: Westendorp, P., Carel, J., Punselie, R. (eds.) Interface Design & Document Design, pp. 81–100. Rodopi, Amsterdam (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abdusselam Selami Cifter
    • 1
  • Hua Dong
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Engineering and Design, UxbridgeBrunel UniversityMiddlesexUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations