Technology Enhanced Learning for People with Intellectual Disabilities and Cerebral Paralysis: The MAS Platform

  • Ricardo Colomo-Palacios
  • Fernando Paniagua-Martín
  • Ángel García-Crespo
  • Belén Ruiz-Mezcua
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 73)


Education for students with disabilities now takes place in a wide range of settings, thus, including a wider range of assistive tools. As a result of this, one of the most interesting application domains of technology enhanced learning is related to the adoption of learning technologies and designs for people with disabilities. Following this unstoppable trend, this paper presents MAS, a software platform aimed to help people with severe intellectual disabilities and cerebral paralysis in their learning processes. MAS, as a technology enhanced learning platform, provides several tools that supports learning and monitoring for people with special needs, including adaptative games, data processing and monitoring tools. Installed in a special needs education institution in Madrid, Spain, MAS provides special educators with a tool that improved students education processes.


assistive technology adaptive toys handicapped persons special needs assistive technologies 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Davies, D.K., Stock, S.E., Wehmeyer, M.L.: Enhancing Independent Task Performance for Individuals with Mental Retardation Through Use of a Handheld Self-Directed Visual and Audio Prompting System. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities 37(2), 209–218 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smith, P.D., Gast, D.L., Logan, K.R., Jacobs, H.A.: Customizing instruction to maximize functional outcomes for students with profound multiple disabilities. Exceptionality 9(3), 135–145 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sze, S., Murphy, J., Smith, M., Yu, S., Murphy, J.: An investigation of various types of assistive technology (AT) for students with disabilities. In: Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, vol. 2004(1), pp. 4459–4964. AACE, Norfolk (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sturm, J.M., Clendon, S.A.: Augmentative and alternative communication, language, and literacy: Fostering the relationship. Topics in Language Disorders 24(1), 76–91 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hetzroni, O.E.: A positive behavior support: A preliminary evaluation of a school-wide plan for implementing AAC in a school for students with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 28(3), 283–296 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cook, A.M., Hussey, S.M.: Assistive technologies: Principles and practice, 2nd edn. Mosby, St. Louis (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wilkinson, K.M., Hennig, S.: The state of research and practice in augmentative and alternative communication for children with developmental/intellectual disabilities. Developmental disabilities research reviews 13(1), 58–69 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Durfee, J.L., Billingsley, F.F.: A comparison of two computer input devices for uppercase letter matching. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 53(2), 214–220 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shimizu, H., McDonough, C.S.: Programmed instruction to teach pointing with a computer mouse in preschoolers with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities 27(2), 175–189 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rao, R.S., Seliktar, R., Rahman, T.: Evaluation of an isometric and a position joystick in a target acquisition task for individuals with cerebral palsy. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 8(1), 118–125 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shih, C.H., Shih, T.S.: Assisting people with multiple disabilities to use computers with multiple mice. Research in Developmental Disabilities 30(4), 746–754 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Daniels, L.E., Sparling, J.W., Reilly, M., Humphry, R.: Use of assistive technology with young children with severe and profound disabilities. Infant-Toddler Intervention: The Transdisciplinary Journal 5(1), 91–111 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mechling, L.C.: Assistive Technology as a Self-Management Tool for Prompting Students with Intellectual Disabilities to Initiate and Complete Daily Tasks: A Literature Review. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities 42(3), 252–269 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lancioni, G.E., O’Reilly, M.F., Basili, G.: Use of microswitches and speech output systems with people with severe/profound intellectual or multiple disabilities: A literature review. Research in Developmental Disabilities 22(1), 21–40 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Logan, K.R., Gast, D.L.: Conducting preference assessments and reinforcer testing for individuals with profound multiple disabilities: Issues and procedures. Exceptionality 9(3), 123–134 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Siegel, J.: Utilizing Technology for the Inclusion of Individuals with Mental Retardation. In: Retish, P., Reiter, S., et al. (eds.) Adults with Disabilities: International Perspectives in the Community, pp. 287–308. Lawerence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah (1999)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li-Tsang, C.W.P., Chan, C.C.H., Lam, C., Hui-Chan, C., Yeung, S.Z.: Evaluations of an Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Training Programme for Persons with Intellectual Disabilities. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W.L., Burger, D. (eds.) ICCHP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3118, pp. 1032–1038. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wehmeyer, M.L.: Assistive technology and students with mental retardation: Utilization and barriers. Journal of Special Education Technology 14(1), 48–58 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Parette, H.P.: The importance of technology in the education and training of persons with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation 26(2), 65–178 (1991)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bryant, D.P., Bryant, B.R., Raskind, M.H.: Using assistive technology to enhance the skills of students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic 34(1), 53–58 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bryant, D.P., Bryant, B.R.: Assistive technology for people with disabilities. Allyn and Bacon, Boston (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Martínez-Marrero, I., Estrada-Hernández, N.: Assistive Technology: An Instructional Tool to Assist College Students with Written Language Disabilities. TechTrends 52(1), 56–62 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wehmeyer, M.L.: National Survey of the Use of Assistive Technology by Adults with Mental Retardation. Mental Retardation 36(1), 44–51 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Draffan, E.A., Evans, D.G., Blenkhorn, P.: Use of assistive technology by students with dyslexia in post-secondary education. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2(2), 105–116 (2007)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hess, K.L., Morrier, M.J., Heflin, J., Ivey, M.L.: Autism Treatment Survey: Services Received by Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders in Public School Classrooms. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 38(5), 961–971 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Johnstone, C., Thurlow, M., Altman, J., Timmons, J., Kato, K.: Assistive Technology Approaches for Large-Scale Assessment: Perceptions of Teachers of Students with Visual Impairments. Exceptionality: A Special Education Journal 17(2), 66–75 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Riffel, L.A., Wehmeyer, M.L., Turnbull, A.P., Lattimore, J., Davies, D., Stock, S., Fisher, S.: Promoting independent performance of transition-related tasks using a palmtop PC-based self-directed visual and auditory prompting system. Journal of Special Education Technology 20(2), 5–14 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stock, S.E., Davies, D.K., Davies, K.R., Wehmeyer, M.L.: Evaluation of an Application for Making Palmtop Computers Accessible to Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 31(1), 39–46 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mechling, L.C., Gast, D.L., Cronin, B.A.: The effects of presenting high preference items, paired with choice, via computer-based video programming on task completion of students with a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities 21(1), 7–13 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mechling, L.C., Pridgen, L., Cronin, B.A.: Computer-based video instruction to teach students with intellectual disabilities to verbally respond to questions and make purchases in fast food restaurants. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities 40(1), 47–59 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ricardo Colomo-Palacios
    • 1
  • Fernando Paniagua-Martín
    • 1
  • Ángel García-Crespo
    • 1
  • Belén Ruiz-Mezcua
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentUniversidad Carlos III de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations