Measurement Study of Multi-party Video Conferencing
More and more free multi-party video conferencing applications are readily available over the Internet and both Server-to-Client (S/C) or Peer-to-Peer (P2P) technologies are used. Investigating their mechanisms, analyzing their system performance, and measuring their quality are important objectives for researchers, developers and end users. In this paper, we take four representative video conferencing applications and reveal their characteristics and different aspects of Quality of Experience. Based on our observations and analysis, we recommend to incorporate the following aspects when designing video conferencing applications: 1) Traffic load control/balancing algorithms to better use the limited bandwidth resources and to have a stable conversation; 2) Use traffic shaping policy or adaptively re-encode streams in real time to limit the overall traffic.
This work is, to our knowledge, the first measurement work to study and compare mechanisms and performance of existing free multi-party video conferencing systems.
KeywordsVideo Quality Mean Opinion Score Video Conferencing Super Node Upload Bandwidth
- 1.Baset, S.A., Schulzrinne, H.: An Analysis of the Skype Peer-to-Peer Internet Telephony Protocol. In: INFOCOM ’06, Barcelona, Spain (April 2006)Google Scholar
- 2.De Cicco, L., Mascolo, S., Palmisano, V.: Skype Video Responsiveness to Bandwidth Variations. In: NOSSDAV ’08, Braunschweig, Germany (May 2008)Google Scholar
- 3.Spiers, R., Ventura, N.: An Evaluation of Architectures for IMS Based Video Conferencing, Technical Report of University of Cape Town (2008)Google Scholar
- 4.Silver, M.S.: Browser-based applications: popular but flawed? Information Systems and E-Business Management 4(4) (October 2006)Google Scholar
- 5.Trueb, G., Lammers, S., Calyam, P.: High Definition Videoconferencing: Codec Performance, Security, and Collaboration Tools, REU Report, Ohio Supercomputer Center, USA (2007)Google Scholar
- 6.Rix, A.W.: A new PESQ-LQ scale to assist comparison between P.862 PESQ score and subjective MOS, ITU-T SG12 COM12-D86 (May 2003)Google Scholar
- 8.ITU-T Rec. P.800, Methods for Subjective Determination of Transmission Quality (1996)Google Scholar
- 10.ITU BT.1359-1, Relative timing of sound and vision for broadcasting (1998)Google Scholar
- 11.Lias, J.L.: HDMI’s Lip Sync and audio-video synchronization for broadcast and home video, Simplay Labs, LLC (August 2008)Google Scholar
- 12.Bartoli, I., Iacovoni, G., Ubaldi, F.: A synchronization control scheme for Videoconferencing services. Journal of multimedia 2(4) (August 2007)Google Scholar