DBEM and FEM Analysis of an Extrusion Press Fatigue Failure

  • R. CitarellaEmail author
  • G. Cricrì
  • M. Lepore
  • M. Perrella
Part of the Advanced Structured Materials book series (STRUCTMAT, volume 3)


This paper presents an application of the Dual Boundary Element Method (DBEM) to the simulation of a fatigue crack propagation affecting the main cylinder of an extrusion press for aluminum sections. The crack initiates at the inner surface of the cylinder and propagates through the thickness causing a leakage of the pressurized oil and consequent production stop. The fatigue load is induced by the pressure variation inside the cylinder as needed to push each section through the extrusion hole. The aim of the simulation is to assess the most probable initial crack dimensions that, after the recorded in service fatigue cycles, lead to the final crack scenario. This was requested in order to assess if there was a rogue detectable flaw introduced by the manufacturing process. For validation purposes, the DBEM numerical results in terms of Stress Intensity Factors (SIFs) in the initial cracked configuration are compared with corresponding Finite Element Method (FEM) results. DBEM SIFs are calculated by both J-integral and Crack Opening Displacement (COD) approaches, whereas for FEM SIFs only COD is used.


Crack Propagation DBEM FEM Extrusion Press 


  1. 1.
    Y. Mi, M.H. Aliabadi, Dual boundary element method for three dimensional fracture mechanics analysis. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 10, 161–171 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Y. Mi, Three-Dimensional Analysis of Crack Growth, Topics in Engineering, vol. 28 (Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, 1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. M. BEASY Ltd., BEASY V10r10 Documentation, Southampton (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Calì, R. Citarella, M. Perrella, Three-Dimensional Crack Growth: Numerical Evaluations and Experimental Tests, Biaxial/Multiaxial Fatigue and Fracture, ESIS Publication, vol. 31 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Citarella, M. Perrella, Multiple surface crack propagation: Numerical simulations and experimental tests. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 28, 135–148 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Citarella, F.G. Buchholz, Comparison of crack growth simulation by DBEM and FEM for SEN-specimens undergoing torsion or bending loading. J. Eng. Fract. Mech. 75, 489–509 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Citarella, F.G. Buchholz, Comparison of DBEM and FEM crack path predictions with experimental findings for a SEN-specimen under anti-plane shear loading. Key Eng. Mater. 348–349, 129–132 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Leski, Implementation of the virtual crack closure technique in engineering FE calculations. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 43(3), 261–268 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    K.S. Venkatesha, T.S. Ramamurthy, B. Dattaguru, Generalized modified crack closure integral (GMCCI) and its application to interface crack problems. Comput. Struct. 60(4), 665–676 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G.C. Sih, B.C.K. Cha, A fracture criterion for three-dimensional crack problems. J. Eng. Fract. Mech. 6, 699–732 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    T.L. Anderson, Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications, 3rd edn. (Taylor & Francis, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Citarella
    • 1
    Email author
  • G. Cricrì
    • 1
  • M. Lepore
    • 1
  • M. Perrella
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of SalernoFiscianoItaly

Personalised recommendations