The Secret Life of Machines – Boundary Objects in Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul
The increasing level of automation in tight just-in-time subcontracting relationships in the automotive industry makes the complex, weak structured, knowledge intense and highly cooperative practice of Reactive Maintenance (RM) in Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) in this branch a demanding and stressful job. In this paper two typical breakdown situations are presented which occurred in a participative observation to gain insights to this field. Based on the analysis of the observations and the existing MRO related IT infrastructure we refer to the theoretical concept of ‘boundary objects’ to understand the practice in this field. Finally, implications for design for a MRO supporting pervasive computing environment are derived from this conceptualization. We highlight the potentials of attaching relevant information to physical objects in place to support and motivate documentation by bridging the physical world of machines with the virtual information space and to enhance the discovering of relevant information in breakdowns situations.
Keywordsmaintenance repair overhaul collaboration boundary-objects histories practice observation UbiComp autoID physical sensor-networks
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Star, S.L.: The structure of ill-structured solutions: boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In: Distributed Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, pp. 37–54. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1989)Google Scholar
- 4.Orr, J.E.: Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job (Collection on Technology and Work). Cornell University Press, New York (1996)Google Scholar
- 9.Lampe, M., Strassner, M.: The Potential of RFID for Moveable Asset Management. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Workshop on Ubiquitous Commerce. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar
- 13.Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. In: Aldine Transaction, Piscataway, NJ, USA (1999)Google Scholar
- 18.Pfeffer, J., Hinds, P.: Why Organizations Don’t “Know What They Know”: Cognitive and Motivational Factors Affecting the Transfer of Expertise. In: Ackerman, M., Pipek, V., Wulf, V. (eds.) Sharing Expertise: Beyond Knowledge Management, pp. 3–32. MIT Press, Camebridge (2002)Google Scholar
- 19.Reichling, T., Veith, M.: Expertise sharing in a heterogeneous organizational environment. In: Gellersen, H., Schmidt, K., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., Mackay, W. (eds.) Proceedings of the ninth conference on European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 325–345. Springer, New York (2005)Google Scholar