Advertisement

High-resolution mapping and visualization of a climbing wall

  • Natalia Kolecka
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)

Abstract

Many cartographers are making an effort to depict mountainous steep relief on classical maps. There are many techniques that enable achieving this goal effectively. However nowadays we notice a trend toward 3D realistic representation of relief, using Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) derived from aerial photographs or satellite imagery. They are very useful and sufficient for visualizing and modeling various terrain features — from flat to hilly. Nevertheless the mountainous terrain is very problematic, as very steep slopes cannot be seen and depicted from bird'. That is why an alternative method should be used to gather information and visualize terrain with vertical relief, otherwise information about such areas is omitted or very poor (Butler et al. 1998; Gooch et al. 1999; Buchroithner 2002; Mergili 2007). The aper resents ossible pplication of close-range photogrammetry for mapping and visualization of steep (close to vertical) rock walls. In this way integration of photogrammetry, digital cartography and photorealism meets the needs of information systems for climbers and tourism in general. Technology and software is similar to that being used in aerial photogrammetry, but some differences in concept should be considered in order to generate spatial model in horizontal projection, so called quasi-DEM. The research object is a part of natural climbing wall situated in Krakow, Poland. The surface is approximately vertical, with some parts which are overhung. It is also very rough, so many shades appear. For the creation of quasi-DEM, quasi-orthophoto and virtual rock face, 4 overlapping photographs were taken with Nikon D80 amateur digital camera. Object distance was about 5.5 m, and ground resolution about 1.8 mm. The camera was previously calibrated with ImageMaster software by Topcon and known parameters of the camera lens allowed the removal of the distortion from the images. ERDAS LPS (Leica Photogrammetry Suite) was used to perform photogrammetric processing. In order to demonstrate the potential of the technique, some steps used by climbers are marked, and anaglyphic methods facilitate a three dimensional perception. That can help inexperienced climbers to plan their route and prepare for the real experience.

Keywords

close-range photogrammetry visualization anaglyph vertical relief terrain models mountain cartography climbing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Buchroithner M (2002) Creating the virtual Eiger North Face. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing 57: 114–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Butler JB, Lane SN, Chandler JH (1998) Assessment of DEM quality for characterizing surface roughness using close range digital photogrammetry. Photogrammetric Record, 16(92): 271–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chandler J, Ashmore P, Paola C, Gooch M, Varkaris F (2001) Monitoring river channel change using terrestrial oblique digital imagery and automated digital photogrammetry. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(4): 631–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cardenal J, Mata E, Perez-Garcia JL, Delgado J, Hernandez MA, Gonzalez A, Diaz-de-Teran JR (2008) Close range digital photogrammetry techniques applied to landslide monitoring. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Beijing, China, Vol. XXXVII, Part B8: 235–240.Google Scholar
  5. Doneus M, Hanke K (1999) Anaglyph images — still a good way to look at 3D-objects? http://cipa.icomos.org/fileadmin/papers/olinda/99c411.pdf (July 05, 2009)
  6. ERDAS, LPS Product Description. http://www.erdas.com
  7. Gooch MJ, Chandler JH, Stojic M (1999) Accuracy assessment of Digital Elevation Models generated using Erdas Imagine Orthomax digital photogrammetric system. Photogrammetric Record, 16(93): 519–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Haggren H, Koistinen K, Junnilainen H, Erving A (2005) Photogrammetric Documentation and Modelling of an Archeological Site: The Finnish Jabal Haroun Project. Proceedings of the ISPRS Working Group V/4 Workshop 3D-ARCH 2005: “Virtual Reconstruction and Visualization of Complex Architectures” Mestre-Venice, Italy.Google Scholar
  9. Landstaedter R, Kaufmann V (2004) Change detection of a mountain slope by means of ground-based photogrammetry: a case study in the Austrian Alps. Proceedings of the 4thICA Mountain Cartography Workshop, Vall de Nuria, Catalonia, Spain, Monografies 0t cniques 8, Institut Cartogràfic de Catalunya, Barcelona, pp 77–88.Google Scholar
  10. Mergili M (2007) Stereo matching of terrestrial digital photographs — an alternative for the generation of high-resolution DEMs in situations of poor data availability? Geospatial Crossroads @ GI_Forum (Car, A., Griesebner G. und Strob J. (eds.)), Proceedings of the First Geoinformatics Forum Salzburg 2007, Wichmann, Heidelberg, pp. 110–119.Google Scholar
  11. Murphy T (2004) Visualising and Learning about the environment with 3D maps. Proceedings of the 2004 Conference of North American Association for Environmental Education http://www.naaee.org/conference2006/2004-conference-proceedings (July 05, 2009).
  12. Pitkaenen T, Kajuutti K (2004) Close-range photogrammetry as a tool in glacier change detection. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey, Vol. XXXV, Part B7, pp. 769–773.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natalia Kolecka
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GIS, Cartography and Remote Sensing, Institute of Geography and Spatial ManagementJagiellonian UniversityKrakowPoland

Personalised recommendations