Hypsometry in Tactile Maps

  • Vit Voženílek
  • Veronika Růžičková
  • Dita Finková
  • Libuše Ludíková
  • Zuzana Nĕmcová
  • Jan Doležal
  • Alena Vondráková
  • Magdaléna Kozáková
  • Vojtĕch Regec
Chapter

Abstract

People either perceive geospace directly through their senses or their perception is mediated via geo-information. Those who are blind or visually impaired have to fight difficulties in perceiving geospace. It is one of the tasks of cartography to provide these people with suitable devices to perceive and study geospace. Modern tactile maps enable perception of geospace in a highly illustrative way. The hypsometric map of Europe created at the Palacký University in Olomouc as part of a development programme can serve as an example. These maps are unique three-dimensional tactile maps that enable people with visual impairment make use of residual vision and blind people use Braille. Three-dimensional imaging represents a revolutionary approach to tangible geospace representation. The resulting product is a three-dimensional model with discrete hypsometric layers, with Braille writings and with contrasting colours that distinguish it for people with visual impairment. The hypsometric map of Europe is unique thanks to its processing technique. Its illustrative character provides more information to people with visual impairment than what had been possible to date.

Keywords

elevation tactile maps 3D printing Braille perception blind persons 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amick N, Corcoran J (et al.) (1997) Guidelines for design of tactile graphics [online]. New York, American Printing House for the Blind [http://www.aph.org/edresearch/guides.htm]Google Scholar
  2. Bentzen B (1973) Sites, Perception and the Non-visual Experience. In Kidwell, Clarke CR (1993: Introduction to Thermoforming 3: Vacuum Forming. Ammanford, Dyfed, C.R.Clarke & Co. Ltd. [http://www.crclarke.co.uk/]
  3. Edman PK (1992) Tactile Graphics. New York: American Foundation for the Blind.Google Scholar
  4. Finková F, Růžičková V (2009) Improvement in Spatial Sensation for persons with visual impairment through the medium of tactile / Braille maps. In Specjalne potrzeby edukacyjne. Tom 1. Bielsko – Biala: WSAGoogle Scholar
  5. Gibson JJ (1968) The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. London, George Allen and Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
  6. Greenspan JD, Bolanowski SJ (1996) The psychophysics of tactile perception and its peripheral physiological basis. San Diego, Academic Press: 25–104Google Scholar
  7. Hirn H (2005) Tactile maps for preschool children: the curriculum. Proceedings of XXII International Cartographic Conference A Coruña 2005Google Scholar
  8. Jehoel S, Dinar S, McCallum D, Rowell J, Ungar S (2005) A scientific approach to tactile map design: minimum elevation of tactile map symbols. Proceedings of XXII International Cartographic Conference A Coruña 2005Google Scholar
  9. Jesenský J (1988) Hmatové vnímání pomocí tyflografiky. SPN, Praha.Google Scholar
  10. Kozáková M, Voženílek V (2008) Současné technologie tvorby hmatových map. In Feranec J, Fencík R (ed) Aktivity v kartografii. Zborník referátov zo seminára, Kartografická spoločnost' SR, Geografický ústav SAV Vydavatelství SAV, BratislavaGoogle Scholar
  11. Kozáková M, Voženílek V (2009) Thematic information in tactile maps. Kartografické listy, 2009 (17):Google Scholar
  12. Kraak MJ, Ormeling FJ (1996) Cartography: Visualization of spatial data. Addison Addison Wesley Longman, Harlow, EssexGoogle Scholar
  13. LaMotte RH, Whitehouse J (1986) Tactile detection of a dot on a smooth surface: peripheral neural events. Journal of Neurophysiology, 56 (4): 1109–1128.Google Scholar
  14. Lederman SJ (1974) Tactile roughness of grooved surfaces: the touching process and effects of macro- and micro-surface structure. Perception and Psychophysics, 16 (2): 385–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lobben AK (2005) Identifying the needs of tactile map makers. Proceedings of XXII International Cartographic Conference A Coruña 2005Google Scholar
  16. Nolan CY, Morris JE (1971) Improvement of Tactual Symbols for Blind Children. Final Report, Washington, DC, Department of Health, Education and Welfare.Google Scholar
  17. Perkins C, Gardiner A (1997) “What I really, really want”: how visually impaired people can improve tactile map design in ICC 97. Proceedings of 18th ICA/ACI International Cartographic Conference: Stockholm, Sweden, 23–27 June 1997: 1159–1166Google Scholar
  18. Pravda J (2006) Metódy mapového vyjadrovania, Klasifikácia a ukážky. VEDA, vydavat'elstvo Slovenskej akadémie vied, BratislavaGoogle Scholar
  19. Rowell J, Ungar S (2005) Feeling our way: Tactile map user requirements – a survey. Proceedings of XXII International Cartographic Conference A Coruña 2005Google Scholar
  20. Růžičková V, Stejskalová K, Ludíková L, Finková D, Voženílek V, Kozáková M, Št'ávová Z (2009) Orientation and mobility of persons with visual impairment in the Czech Republic within the context of an evolving Europe. In Conference report. ICEVI 2009, DublinGoogle Scholar
  21. Theissen N (2000) Computer-aided Tactual Graphics (Getting Started…). Enfield, Royal Blind Society.Google Scholar
  22. Ungar S, Jehoel S, McCallum D, Rowell J (2005) „Tactualization“ of spatial information: towards a perceptual-cognitive approach to tactile map design. Proceedings of XXII International Cartographic Conference A Coruña 2005Google Scholar
  23. Veverka B (2004) Topografická a tematická kartografie 10. Vydavatelství ČVUT, PrahaGoogle Scholar
  24. Voženílek V (2001) Aplikovaná kartografie I - tematické mapy. Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci, OlomoucGoogle Scholar
  25. Voženílek V (2005) Cartography for GIS – geovisualization and map communication. Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci, OlomoucGoogle Scholar
  26. Wiedel JW, Groves PA (1969) Tactual Mapping: Design, Reproduction, Reading and Interpretation. Washington, DC, Department of Health, Education and WelfareGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vit Voženílek
    • 1
  • Veronika Růžičková
    • 1
  • Dita Finková
    • 1
  • Libuše Ludíková
    • 1
  • Zuzana Nĕmcová
    • 1
  • Jan Doležal
    • 1
  • Alena Vondráková
    • 1
  • Magdaléna Kozáková
    • 1
  • Vojtĕch Regec
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeoinformaticsPalacký University OlomoucOlomoucCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations