Model-Based Extension of AUTOSAR for Architectural Online Reconfiguration

  • Basil Becker
  • Holger Giese
  • Stefan Neumann
  • Martin Schenck
  • Arian Treffer
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6002)

Abstract

In the last few years innovations in the automotive domain have been realized by software, leading to a dramatically increased complexity of such systems. Additionally, automotive systems have to be flexible and robust, e.g., to be able to deal with failures of sensors, actuators or other constituents of an automotive system. One possibility to achieve robustness and flexibility in automotive systems is the usage of reconfiguration capabilities. However, adding such capabilities introduces an even higher degree of complexity. To avoid this drawback we propose to integrate reconfiguration capabilities into AUTOSAR, an existing framework supporting the management of such a complex system at the architectural level. Elaborated and expensive tools and toolchains assist during the development of automotive systems. Hence, we present how our reconfiguration solution has been seamlessly integrated into such a toolchain.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Burmester, S., Giese, H., Münch, E., Oberschelp, O., Klein, F., Scheideler, P.: Tool Support for the Design of Self-Optimizing Mechatronic Multi-Agent Systems. Intl. Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer 10(3), 207–222 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Becker, B., Giese, H., Neumann, S., Treffer, A., Schenck, M.: Model-Based Extension of AUTOSAR for Architectural Online Reconfiguration. In: Proc. of the 2nd International Workshop on Model Based Architecting and Construction of Embedded Systems (ACES-MB 2009), pp. 105–112 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Giese, H., Burmester, S., Schäfer, W., Oberschelp, O.: Modular design and verification of component-based mechatronic systems with online-reconfiguration. In: Proc. SIGSOFT 2004/FSE-12, pp. 179–188. ACM Press, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Feng, L., Chen, D., Törngren, M.: Self configuration of dependent tasks for dynamically reconfigurable automotive embedded systems. In: Proc. of 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 3737–3742 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anthony, R., Ekeling, C.: Policy-driven self-management for an automotive middleware. In: HotAC II: Hot Topics in Autonomic Computing on Hot Topics in Autonomic Computing, Berkeley, CA, USA. USENIX Association (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    DySCAS Project: Guidelines and Examples on Algorithm and Policy Design in the DySCAS Middleware System, Deliverable D2.3 Part III. (February 2009), http://www.dyscas.org/doc/DySCAS_D2.3_part_III.pdf
  7. 7.
    Pohl, K., Böckl, G., van der Linden, F.: Software Product Line Engineering. In: Foundations, Principles, and Techniques. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hallsteinsen, S., Hinchey, M., Park, S., Schmid, K.: Dynamic Software Product Lines. Computer 41(4), 93–95 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feiler, P.H., Gluch, D.P., Hudak, J.J.: The Architecture Analysis & Design Language (AADL): An Introduction. Techreport no. CMU/SEI-2006-TN-011 - Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim, M., Jeong, J., Park, S.: From product lines to self-managed systems: an architecture-based runtime reconfiguration framework. In: Proc. of Workshop on Design and Evolution of Autonomic Application Software, pp. 1–7. ACM, New York (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim, D., Park, S., Jin, Y., Chang, H., Park, Y.S., Ko, I.Y., Lee, K., Lee, J., Park, Y.C., Lee, S.: SHAGE: a Framework for Self-managed Robot Software. In: Proc. SEAMS 2006, Shanghai, China, pp. 79–85. ACM, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Trapp, M., Adler, R., Förster, M., Junger, J.: Runtime adaptation in safety-critical automotive systems. In: SE 2007: Proc. of the 25th conference on IASTED (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Georgas, J.C., Taylor, R.N.: Policy-based Self-adaptive Architectures: A Feasibility Study in the Robotics Domain. In: Proc. SEAMS 2008, pp. 105–112. ACM, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Talpin, J.P., Brunette, C., Gautier, T., Gamatié, A.: Polychronous Mode Automata. In: EMSOFT 2006: Proc. of the 6th ACM & IEEE International Conference on Embedded software, pp. 83–92. ACM, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    AUTOSAR GbR: List of Basic Software Modules. Version 1.3.0Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    AUTOSAR GbR: Specification of RTE. Version 2.1.0Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    AUTOSAR GbR: Specification of the Virtual Functional Bus, Version 1.0.2 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    AUTOSAR GbR: Specification of Operating System, Version 3.1.1 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Basil Becker
    • 1
  • Holger Giese
    • 1
  • Stefan Neumann
    • 1
  • Martin Schenck
    • 1
  • Arian Treffer
    • 1
  1. 1.Hasso Plattner Institute at the University of PotsdamPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations