Skip to main content

Learning and Adaptation: The Role of Fisheries Comanagement in Building Resilient Social–Ecological Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Adaptive Capacity and Environmental Governance

Abstract

This chapter focuses on factors affecting the capacity of co-management to contribute to building resilient social–ecological fishery systems. Drawing on co-management examples from Africa and South America, we show that, while creating co-management and enabling legal frameworks may be relatively easy, the challenge lies in sustaining the institutional initiatives over the long-term. The chapter concludes that key aspects for successful and sustainable co-management include the presence of mechanisms for building learning and adaptive capacity at government and community levels. By reorganizing themselves through co-management, fishing communities have an adaptive mechanism in the face of disturbance to respond to and cope with fisheries crisis. However not all the co-management case-studies we review have shown the capacity to adapt and recover from disturbance, once locally defined customary systems have been eroded. Imposed self-organization through externally-conceived co-management did not allow for learning and adaptation. Institutional rigidity, lack of appropriate management time-frame and insufficient flexibility of management instruments associated with a lack of fisher's participation into co-management systems all characterize the challenges to adaptive capacity in these cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Béné C (2003) When fishery rhymes with poverty: a first step beyond the old paradigm on poverty in small-scale fisheries. World Dev 31(6):949–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Folke C (1998) Linking social and ecological systems. Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Jolly D (2001) Adapting to climate change: social–ecological resilience in a Canadian western Arctic community. Conserv Ecol 5(2):18

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Seixas C (2005) Building resilience in lagoon social–ecological systems: a local-level perspective. Ecosystems 8:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) (2003) Navigating social–ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Walker B, Anderies JM, Abel N (2001) From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4:765–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castilla JC, Manrıquez P, Alvarado J et al (1998) Artisanal ‘caletas’ as units of production and co-managers of benthic invertebrates in Chile. In: Jamieson GS, Campbell A (eds) Proc North Pacific symp on invertebrate stock assessment and management. Can Spec Publ Fish Aquat Sci 125: 407–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Castilla JC, Fernández M (1998) Small-scale benthic fisheries in Chile: on co-management and sustainable use of benthic invertebrates. Ecol Appl 8(Suppl):S124–S132

    Google Scholar 

  • Castilla JC, Defeo O (2001) Latin American benthic shellfisheries: emphasis on co-management and experimental practices. Rev Fish Biol Fish 11:1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diegues AC (2008) Marine protected areas and artisanal fisheries in Brazil. Samudra Monograph. International Collective in Support of Fishworkers, Chennai, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Colding J, Berkes F (2003) Synthesis: building resilience and adaptive capacity in social–ecological systems. In: Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) Navigating social–ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 352–387

    Google Scholar 

  • González E (1996) Territorial use rights in Chilean fisheries. Mar Resour Econ 11:211–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Light SS (1995) Barriers and bridges in the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna SS, Jentoft S (1996) Human use of the natural environment: an overview of social and economic dimensions. In: Hanna SS, Folke C, Maler K (eds) Rights to nature: ecological, economic, cultural and political principles of institutions for the environment. Island, Washington, DC, pp 35–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Hara M, Donda S, Njaya FJ (1999) Fisheries co-management: a review of the theoretical basis and assumptions. South Afr Perspect 77:1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Hara M, Donda S, Njaya FJ (2002) Lessons from Malawi’s experience with fisheries co-management initiatives. In: Geheb K, Sarch MT (eds) Africa’s inland fisheries: the management challenge. Fountain, Kampala, Uganda, pp 31–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn R, Orensanz JM, Parma AM (2005) Institutions, incentives and the future of fisheries. Phil Trans R Soc B 360:47–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS, Berkes F, Folke C (1998) Science, sustainability and resource management. In: Berkes F, Folke C (eds) Linking social and ecological systems. Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 342–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Jentof S (2003) Co-management: the way forward. In: Wilson DC, Raajær Nielsen J, Degnbol P (eds) The fisheries co-management experience. Accomplishments, challenges and prospects. Kluwer, London, pp 1–13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft S (2000) Legitimacy and disappointment in fisheries management. Mar Policy 24(2):141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft S, McCay BJ (1995) User participation in fisheries management. Lessons drawn from international experiences. Mar Policy 19:227–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalikoski DC (2002) The forum of the Patos Lagoon: an analysis of comanagement arrangement for conservation of coastal resources in southern Brazil. Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalikoski DC, Satterfield T (2004) On crafting a fisheries co-management arrangement in the estuary of Patos Lagoon (Brazil): opportunities and challenges faced through implementation. Mar Policy 28:503–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalikoski DC, Vasconcellos M (2007) The role of fishers' knowledge in the co-management of small-scale fisheries in the Estuary of Patos Lagoon, Southern Brazil. In: Haggan N, Neis B, Baird IG (eds) Fishers’ knowledge in fisheries science and management. Blackwell/UNESCO, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Njaya FJ (2002) Fisheries co-management in Malawi: implementation arrangements for lakes Malombe, Chilwa and Chiuta. In: Geheb K, Sarch MT (eds) Africa’s inland fisheries: the management challenge. Fountain, Kampala, Uganda, pp 9–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson P, Folke C, Berkes F (2004) Adaptive co-management for building resilience in social–ecological systems. Environ Manage 34(1):75–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Orensanz JM, Parma AM, Jerez G et al (2005) What are the key elements for the sustainability of “S-fisheries”? Insights from South America. Bull Mar Sci 76:527–556

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Riordan T (2003) Deliberative democracy and participatory biodiversity. In: O'Riordan T, Stoill S (eds) Biodiversity, human livelihoods and sustainability: protecting beyond the protected. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parma AM, Orensanz JM, Elias I et al (2003) Diving for shellfish and data: incentives for the participation of fishermen in the monitoring and management of artisanal fisheries around southern South America. In: Newman SJ, Gaughan DJ, Jackson G, Mackie MC, Molony B, St John J, Kaiola P, Newman SJ, Gaughan DJ, Jackson G, Mackie MC, Molony B, St John J, Kaiola P (eds) Towards sustainability of data limited multi-sector fisheries. Australian Society for Fish Biology, Department of Fisheries, Perth, Western Australia, pp 8–29, http://www.fish.wa.gov.au/res/broc/report/asfbproc 2001/ASFBProc2001.PDF

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne HE, Castilla JC (1994) Socio-biological assessment of common property resource management: small-scale fishing unions in Central Chile. Out Shell 4:10–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkerton E (2003) Toward specificity in complexity: understanding co-management from a social science perspective. In: Wilson DC, Raajær Nielsen J, Degnbol P (eds) The fisheries co-management experience. Accomplishments, challenges and prospects. Kluwer, London, pp 61–76

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkerton E (ed) (1989) Co-operative management of local fisheries: new directions for improved management and community development. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto da Silva P (2002) From common property to co-management: social change and conservation in Brazil’s first maritime extractive reserve. Ph.D. dissertation, London School of Economics

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto da Silva P (2004) From common property to co-management: lessons from Brazil’s first maritime extractive reserve. Mar Policy 28(2004):419–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis EG, D'Incao F (2000) The present status of artisanal fisheries of extreme southern Brazil: an effort towards community based management. Ocean Coast Manage 43:7–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott A (2000) Introducing property in fisheries management. In: Shotton R (ed) Use of property rights in fisheries management. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 404 /1. FAO, Rome, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Stotz W (1997) Las areas de manejo en la ley de pesca y acuicultura: primeras experiencias y evaluacioń de la utilidad de esta herramienta para el recurso loco. Estud Oceanol (Chile) 16:67–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(2):5

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DC, Nielsen JR, Dengbol P (eds) (2003) The fisheries co-management. Accomplishments, challenges and prospects. Kluwer, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Fikret Berkes and Brian Davy for providing valuable comments in an early version of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela C. Kalikoski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kalikoski, D.C., Allison, E.H. (2010). Learning and Adaptation: The Role of Fisheries Comanagement in Building Resilient Social–Ecological Systems. In: Armitage, D., Plummer, R. (eds) Adaptive Capacity and Environmental Governance. Springer Series on Environmental Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12194-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics