Advertisement

Adapting and Transforming: Governance for Navigating Change

  • Derek Armitage
  • Ryan Plummer
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series on Environmental Management book series (SSEM)

Abstract

To navigate social-ecological change, individuals and societies must develop the capacity to adapt and transform our interactions with ecosystems and ecosystem services. Institutions and multi-level governance arrangements are particularly important in this regard as they can support as well as constrain knowledge building, learning and conflict resolution that may help to reduce vulnerability, build resilience and increase adaptive capacity. However, building adaptive capacity into governance is a daunting challenge. Here, we synthesize the insights of this volume and offer lessons for practice and further research. These lessons include the need to: (1) define and understand social-ecological change; (2) avoid panaceas; (3) recognize relational spaces and the role of institutions; (4) consider the influence of scale; (5) link actors and networks of actors; (6) rethink the role of government; (7) benefit from bridging organizations; (8) promote knowledge co-production and learning processes; (9) highlight the role of ecosystems; and (10) ensure integrative approaches.

Keywords

Ecosystem Service Adaptive Capacity Great Barrier Reef Environmental Governance Relational Space 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Alan Diduck, Carina Keskitalo, and Lisen Schultz for their valuable comments and feedback on an earlier version of this chapter. We thank as well the contributors to the volume for the insights and perspectives they have brought to the challenge of adaptive capacity and governance.

References

  1. Alessa L, Kliskey A, Altaweel M (2009) Toward a typology for social–ecological systems. Sustainability Sci Pract Policy 5(1):31–41Google Scholar
  2. Armitage D, Plummer R, Berkes F, Arthur R, Charles A, Davidson-Hunt I, Diduck A, Doubleday N, Johnson D, Marschke M, McConney P, Pinkerton E, Wollenberg L (2009) Adaptive co-management for social–ecological complexity. Front Ecol Environ 7(2):95–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berkes F (2009) Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. J Environ Manage 90(5):1692–1702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2003) Navigating social–ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Biermann F, Betsill MM, Gupta J, Kanie N, Lebel L, Liverman D, Schroeder H, Siebenhüner B, Conca K, da Costa Ferreira L, Desai B, Tay S, Zondervan R (2009) Earth system governance: people, places and the planet. Science and implementation plan of the earth system governance project, ESG report no. 1, Bonn, IHDP, The Earth System Governance ProjectGoogle Scholar
  6. Bodin O, Crona B (2009) The role of social networks in natural resource governance: what relational patterns make a difference? Glob Environ Change 19(3):366–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boyd E (2008) Navigating Amazonia under uncertainty: past, present and future environmental governance. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 363(1498):1911–1916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brondizio ES, Ostrom E, Young O (2009) Connectivity and the governance of multilevel socio-ecological systems: the role of social capital. Annu Rev Environ Resour 34:253–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carpenter S, Mooney H, Agard J, Capistrano D et al (2009) Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(5):1305–1312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cash DW, Adger WN, Berkes F, Garden P, Lebel L, Olsson P, Pritchard L, Young O (2006) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecol Soc 11(2):8Google Scholar
  11. Davidson-Hunt I, O’Flaherty RM (2007) Researchers, indigenous peoples and place-based learning communities. Soc Nat Resour 20:291–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern PC (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302:1907–1912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duit A, Galaz V (2008) Governing complexity: insights and emerging challenges. Governance 21:311–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social–ecological knowledge. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Galaz V, Olsson P, Hahn T, Folke C, Svedin U (2008) The problem of fit among biophysical systems, environmental and resource regimes, and broader governance systems: insights and emerging challenges. In: Young OR, King LA, Schroeder H (eds) Institutions and environmental change. MIT, Cambridge, pp 147–186Google Scholar
  16. Gibson CC, Ostrom E, Ahn TK (2000) The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey. Ecol Econ 32:217–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gunderson LH, Holling CS (eds) (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  18. Himley M (2008) Geographies of environmental governance: the nexus of nature and neoliberalism. Geogr Compass 2(2):433–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ivey JL, Smithers J, de Loë RC, Kreutzwiser RD (2004) Community capacity for adaptation to climate-induced water shortages: linking institutional complexity and local actors. Environ Manage 33(1):36–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour? Environ Educ Res 8(3):239–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lebel L, Anderies JM, Campbell B, Folke C, Hartfield-Dodds S, Hughes TP, Wilson J (2006) Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 11(1):19. (online). URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art19/ Google Scholar
  22. Lundholm C, Plummer R Learning and resilience: a conspectus for environmental education. Environ Educ Res (in press)Google Scholar
  23. MA (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends. Island, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  24. Milly PCD, Betancourt J, Falkenmark M, Lettenmaier D, Stouffer RJ (2008) Stationarity is dead: whither water management. Science 319(5863):573–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Newig J, Fritsch O (2009) Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level – and effective? Environ Policy Governance 19(3):197–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ostrom E (2005) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  27. Ostrom E (2007) A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(39):15181–15187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social–ecological systems. Science 325(24):419–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pahl-Wostl C (2009) A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Glob Environ Change 19(3):354–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pelling M, High C (2005) Understanding adaptation: what can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity? Glob Environ Change 15(4):308–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pelling M, High C, Dearing J, Smith D (2008) Shadow spaces for social learning: a relational understanding of adaptive capacity to climate change within organisations. Environ Plan A 40:867–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Plummer R (2009) The adaptive co-management process: an initial synthesis of representative models and influential variables. Ecol Soc 14(2):24. (online). URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art24/ Google Scholar
  33. Plummer R, Armitage D (2007) A resilience-based framework for evaluating adaptive co-management: linking ecology, economy and society in a complex world. Ecol Econ 61(1):62–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pomeroy RS, Berkes F (1997) Two to tango: the role of government in fisheries co-management. Mar Policy 21:465–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Riedlinger D, Berkes F (2001) Contributions of traditional knowledge to understanding climate change in the Canadian Arctic. Polar Rec 37:315–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Scheffer M (2009) Critical transitions in nature and society. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  37. Schultz L (2009) Nurturing resilience in social–ecological systems: lessons learned from bridging organizations. Stockholm University Press, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  38. Snow CP (1964) The two cultures. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Sonnenfeld DA, Mol APJ (2002) Globalization and the transformation of environmental governance. Am Behav Sci 45(9):1318–1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stacey R (1996) Complexity and creativity in organizations. Berrett-Koehler, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  41. Steffen W et al (2004) Global change and the earth system: a planet under pressure. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  42. Stoker G (1998) Governance as theory: five propositions. Int Soc Sci J 50(155):17–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tompkins EL, Adger WN (2004) Does adaptive management of natural resources enhance resilience to climatic change? Ecol Soc 9(2). (online). URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art10/
  44. Vatn A (2005) Institutions and the environment. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  45. Walker BH, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(2): 5. (online). URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/ Google Scholar
  46. Young OR, King LA, Schroeder H (eds) (2008) Institutions and environmental change: principal findings, applications, and research frontiers. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography and Environmental StudiesWilfrid Laurier UniversityWaterlooCanada
  2. 2.Department of Tourism and EnvironmentBrock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada
  3. 3.Stockholm Resilience CentreStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations