Advertisement

Building Transformative Capacity for Ecosystem Stewardship in Social–Ecological Systems

  • Per OlssonEmail author
  • Örjan Bodin
  • Carl Folke
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series on Environmental Management book series (SSEM)

Abstract

We use a “resilience lens” to identify gaps in the understanding of capacity to transform social-ecological systems’ (SES) trajectories toward ecosystem stewardship and highlight some challenges that need to be addressed. We draw on the organizational evolution literature in combination with the latest insights on SES transformations to give a more detailed understanding of what constitute transformative capacity. Two case studies illustrate the possibilities and challenges. SES transformations require knowledge and skills that can link ecosystem and social system dynamics, and develop strategies to overcome barriers and enable institutional changes that foster transformations. We identify some criteria that seem important for developing a framework for analyzing transformations and assessing transformative capacity in social-ecological systems. These criteria include experimentation and innovation, agency and social networks, opportunity context, diversity, boundaries, and collaboration.

Keywords

Biomass Europe Shipping Drilling Fishing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aldrich H (1999) Organizations evolving. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison HE, Hobbs RJ (2004) Resilience, adaptive capacity, and the “lock-in trap” of the Western Australian agricultural region. Ecol Soc 9(1):3, [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss1/art3/ Google Scholar
  3. Armitage D, Marschke M, Plummer R (2008) Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Glob Environ Change 18(1):86–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Babcock EA, Pikitch EK (2004) Can we reach agreement on a standardized approach to ecosystem-based fishery management? Bull Mar Sci 74:685–692Google Scholar
  5. Baumgartner FR, Jones BD (1991) Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems. J Polit 53(4):1044–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berkes F, Folke C (eds) (1998) Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) (2003) Navigating social–ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Berkes F, Hughes TP, Steneck RS, Wilson JA, Bellwood DR, Crona B, Folke C, Gunderson LH, Leslie HM, Norberg J, Nyström M, Olsson P, Österblom H, Scheffer M, Worm B (2006) Globalization, roving bandits, and marine resources. Science 311:1557–1558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burt R (1992) Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Carlsson L, Sandström A (2008) Network governance of the commons. Int J Commons 2:33–54Google Scholar
  11. Carpenter SR, Folke C (2006) Ecology for transformation. Trends Ecol Evol 21:309–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carpenter SR, Gunderson LH (2001) Coping with collapse: ecological and social dynamics in ecosystem management. Bioscience 51(6):451–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cash DW, Adger W, Berkes F, Garden P, Lebel L, Olsson P, Pritchard L, Young O (2006) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecol Soc 11(2):8, (online) URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art8/ Google Scholar
  14. Chapin FS III, Carpenter SR, Kofinas GP, Folke C, Abel N, Clark WC, Olsson P, Stafford Smith DM, Walker B, Young OR, Berkes F, Biggs R, Grove JM, Naylor RL, Pinkerton E, Steffen W, Swanson FJ (2010) Ecosystem Stewardship: Sustainability Strategies for a Rapidly Changing Planet. Trends Ecol Evol 25:241–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Costanza R et al (1998) Principles for sustainable governance of the oceans. Science 281:198–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crowder LB et al (2006) Resolving mismatches in U.S. ocean governance. Science 313:617–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cumming GS, Cumming DHM, Redman CL (2006) ‘Scale mismatches in social–ecological systems: causes, consequences, and solutions’. Ecol Soc 11(1):14, (online) URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art14/ Google Scholar
  18. Cumming GS, Olsson P, Chapin FS III, Holling CS (in preparation) Coping with climate change: the urgent need for a learning agendaGoogle Scholar
  19. Danter KJ, Griest DL, Mullins GW, Norland E (2000) Organizational change as a component of ecosystem management. Soc Nat Resour 13:537–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Enfors EI, Gordon LJ, Peterson GD, Bossio D (2008) Making investments in dryland development work: participatory scenario planning in the Makanya catchment, Tanzania. Ecol Soc 13(2):42, [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art42/ Google Scholar
  21. Ernstson H, Sörlin S, Elmqvist T. Social movements and ecosystem services – the role of social network structure in protecting and managing urban green areas in Stockholm. Ecol Soc 13(2):39, [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art39/)
  22. Fischer-Kowalski, Rotmans (2009) Conceptualizing, observing and influencing social ecological transitions. Ecol Soc 14(2):3, [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art3/ Google Scholar
  23. Folke C, Colding J, Berkes F (2003) Synthesis: building resilience and adaptive capacity in social–ecological systems. In: Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) Navigating social–ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 352–387Google Scholar
  24. Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social–ecological knowledge. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Folke C, Pritchard L, Berkes F, Colding J, Svedin U (2007) ‘The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions: ten years later’. Ecol Soc 12(1):30, (online) URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art30/ Google Scholar
  26. Galaz V, Olsson P, Hahn T, Folke C, Svedin U (2008) The problem of fit among biophysical systems, environmental and resource regimes, and broader governance systems: insights and emerging challenges. In: Young OR, King LA, Schröder H (eds) Institutions and environmental change – principal findings, applications, and research frontiers. The MIT, Cambridge, pp 147–182Google Scholar
  27. Garner WB, Bird B, Starr J (1992) Act as if: differentiating entrepreneurial from organizational behavior. Entrepren Theor Pract 16(3):13–32Google Scholar
  28. Geels FW (2005) The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: a multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930). Tech Anal Strat Manag 17(4):445–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Geels FW, Schot J (2007) Typology of socio-technical transition pathways. Res Policy 36(3):399–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gelcich S, Olsson P, Castilla J, Hughes T, Folke C (in preparation) Governance transformation for the sustainable management of marine coastal social–ecological systemsGoogle Scholar
  31. Gordon LJ, Peterson GD, Bennett EM (2008) Agricultural modifications of hydrological flows create ecological surprises. Trends Ecol Evol 23(4):211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Soc 76:1360–1380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gunderson LH (1999) Resilience, flexibility and adaptive management: antidotes for spurious certitude? Conserv Ecol 3(1):7, (online) URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss1/art7 Google Scholar
  34. Gunderson LH, Holling CS (eds) (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in social–ecological systems. Island, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Light SS (eds) (1995) Barriers and bridges to renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Gunderson L, Allen C, Holling CS (2009) Fundamentals of ecological resilience. Island, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  37. Hahn T, Olsson P, Folke C, Johansson K (2006) Trust-building, knowledge generation and organizational innovations: the role of a bridging organization for adaptive comanagement of a wetland landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden. Human Ecol 34:573–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hall PA, Taylor RCR (2006) Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Polit Stud 44:936–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hegmon M, Peeples MA, Kinzig A, Kulow S, Meegan CM, Nelson MC (2008) Social transformation and its human costs in the Prehispanic U.S. Southwest. Am Anthropol 110:313–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Holling CS, Meffe GK (1996) Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conserv Biol 10(2):328–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Holtz G, Brugnach M, Pahl-Wostl C (2008) Specifying “regime” – a framework for defining and describing regimes in transition research. Technol Forecasting Soc Change 75:623–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Huitric M (2005) Lobster and conch fisheries of Belize: a history of sequential exploitation. Ecol Soc 10(1):21, http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art21/ Google Scholar
  43. Imperial MT (1999) Institutional analysis and ecosystem-based management: the institutional analysis and development framework. Environ Manag 24:449–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kay A (2003) Path dependency and the CAP. J Eur Public Pol 10:405–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Loorbach DA (2007) Transition management: new mode of governance for sustainable development. International Books, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
  46. National Research Council (1999a) Sustaining marine fisheries. National Academy, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  47. National Research Council (1999b) Our common journey. National Academy, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  48. Norberg J, Cumming G (eds) (2008) Complexity theory for a sustainable future. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Olsson P, Folke C, Berkes F (2004a) Adaptive co-management for building social–ecological resilience. Environ Manag 34(1):75–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Olsson P, Folke C, Hahn T (2004b) ‘Social–ecological transformation for ecosystem management: the development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Sweden’. Ecol Soc 9(4):2, (online) URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss4/art2 Google Scholar
  51. Olsson P, Gunderson LH, Carpenter SR, Ryan P, Lebel L, Folke C, Holling CS (2006) ‘Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social–ecological systems’. Ecol Soc 11(1):18, (online) URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art18/ Google Scholar
  52. Olsson P, Folke C, Galaz V, Hahn T, Schultz L (2007) Enhancing the fit through adaptive comanagement: creating and maintaining bridging functions for matching scales in the Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve Sweden. Ecol Soc 12(1):28, [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art28/ Google Scholar
  53. Olsson P, Folke C, Hughes TP (2008) Navigating the transition to ecosystem-based management of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 105:9489–9494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pahl-Wostl C (2009) A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Glob Environ Change 19:354–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pahl-Wostl C, Mostert E, Tàbara D (2008) ‘The growing importance of social learning in water resources management and sustainability science’. Ecol Soc 13(1):24, online) URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art24/(last visit November 2008Google Scholar
  57. Peterson GD (2007) Using scenario planning to enable an adaptive co-management process in the northern highlands lake district of Wisconsin. In: Berkes F, Armitage D, Doubleday N (eds) Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance. UBC, Vancouver, pp 289–307Google Scholar
  58. Raskin P, Banuri T, Gallopín G, Gutman P, Hammond A, Kates R, Swart R (2002) Great transition – the promise and lure of the times ahead. Stockholm Environment Institute, BostonGoogle Scholar
  59. Repetto R (ed) (2006) Punctuated equilibrium and the dynamics of U.S. environmental policy. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  60. Resilience Alliance and Santa Fe Institute (2004) Thresholds and alternate states in ecological and social–ecological systems, Resilience Alliance (online) URL: http://www.resalliance.org/index.php?id=183
  61. Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson A, Chapin FS 3rd, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley JA (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461, 472–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Scheffer M, Carpenter SR, Foley JA, Folke C, Walker B (2001) Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413(6856):591–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schultz L, Folke C, Olsson P (2007) Enhancing ecosystem management through social–ecological inventories: lessons from Kristianstads Vattenrike, Sweden. Environ Conserv 34(2):140–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. True JL, Baumgartner FR, Bryan DJ (1999) Explaining stability and change in American policymaking: the punctuated equilibrium model. In: Sabatier P (ed) Theories of the policy process. Westview, Boulder, pp 97–115Google Scholar
  65. United Nations Environment Programme (2007) Global environment outlook: environment for development, vol 4. Progress Press Ltd, VallettaGoogle Scholar
  66. van den Brink M, Meijerink S (2005) Implementing policy innovations: resource dependence, struggle for discursive hegemony and institutional inertia in the Dutch river policy domain. Paper prepared for the ERSA Congress, Amsterdam 23–27, August 2005Google Scholar
  67. Walker B, Barrett S, Polasky S, Galaz V, Folke C, Engström G, Ackerman F, Arrow K, Carpenter SR, Chopra K, Daily G, Ehrlich P, Hughes T, Kautsky N, Levin S, Mäler K-G, Shogren J, Vincent J, Xepapadeas T, de Zeeuw A (2009) Looming global-scale failures and missing institutions. Science 325:1345–1346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Walker BH, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(2):5, [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/ Google Scholar
  69. Walker BH, Abel N, Anderies JM, Ryan P (2009b) Resilience, adaptability, and transformability in the Goulburn-broken catchment, Australia. Ecol Soc 14(1):12, [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art12/ Google Scholar
  70. Westley F (1995) Governing design: the management of social systems and ecosystems management. In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Light S (eds) Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 391–427Google Scholar
  71. Westley F (2002) The devil in the dynamics: adaptive management on the front lines. In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS (eds) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island, Washington, pp 333–360Google Scholar
  72. White L (2000) Changing the “whole system” in the public sector. J Org Change Manag 13:162–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Young OR (2002) Institutional interplay: the environmental consequences of cross-scale interactions. In: Ostrom E, Dietz T, Dolsak N, Stern P, Stonich S, Weber EU (eds) The drama of the commons. National Academy, Washington, pp 265–291Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stockholm Resilience CentreStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  2. 2.The Beijer InstituteThe Royal Swedish Academy of SciencesStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations