Adaptive Capacity as a Dynamic Institutional Process: Conceptual Perspectives and Their Application

Chapter

Abstract

This paper takes exception to approaches to adaptive capacity derived from either ecology or social science that treat it as a systems response to exposure and vulnerability. It argues that many such approaches are inherently tautological (i.e. adaptive capacity is the ability of a system to adapt) and often provide little more than a classification of the determinants of adaptive capacity without an analysis or explanation of it as a dynamic social process. We suggest that such limitations are further compounded in those works that link adaptive capacity to institutional analysis, but which see institutions largely as cultural straitjackets limiting the ability of societies to respond to either ecological or social changes. We argue, instead, for an approach based in “New Institutional Analysis”. Our perspective regards institutions as the cultural frames supporting organizational processes. However, our focus is on the extent to which actors operating in organizations are impeded or facilitated by these cultural frameworks. We argue that it is the capacity of these institutional approaches to permit actions that are effective “adaptive” responses to changing environmental circumstances that is the appropriate measure of adaptive capacity. Such an approach focuses on decision-processes and interactive patterns. It is, we suggest, consistent with the work of Ostrom (2005) and the Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change (IDGEC) of the International Human Dimensions Program (IHDP). We conclude the paper with a brief example of how we are operationalizing our approach in our examination of the adaptive capacity of the 'Arctic Gateway City' of Whitehorse, Yukon.

References

  1. Adger WN (2003) Social capital, collective action and adaptation to climate change. Econ Geog 79(4):387–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Global Environ Change 16:268–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agrawal A (2008) The role of local institutions in adaptation to climate change. IFRI Working Paper W081-3. Prepared for the social dimensions of climate change, Social Development Department. Washington, DC, International Forestry Resources and Institutions Program, IFRI Working Paper W081-3, School of Natural Resources and Environment. Ann Arbor, MI: University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
  4. Albernini A, Chiabai A, Muehlenbachs L (2006) Using expert judgement to assess adaptive capacity to climate change: Evidence from a conjoint choice survey. Global Environ Change 16:123–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berkes F (2003) Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  6. Brinton MC, Nee V (2001) The new institutionalism in sociology. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  7. Brooks N (2003) Vulnerability, risk and adaptation: a conceptual framework. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research. Working Paper 38Google Scholar
  8. Brooks N and Adger WN, Kelly PM (2005) The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation. Global Environ Change 15:151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brunner R, Steelman T, Coe-Juell L, Cromley C, Edwards C, Tucker D (2005) Adaptive governance: integrating science, policy and decision making. Columbia University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  10. Dimaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The Iron Cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Socio Rev 48(2):147–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Enns S, Malinick T, Matthews R (2008) It’s not only who you know, its also where they are: using the position generator to investigate the structure of access to socially embedded resources. In: Lin N, Erickson BH (eds) Social capital: advances in research. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, pp 255–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fiori S (2002) Alternative visions of change in Douglas North’s new institutionalism. J Econ Issues 36(4):1025–1043Google Scholar
  13. Gunderson LH, Holling CS (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  14. Hall P, Taylor RCR (1996) Political science and the 3 new institutionalisms. MPIFG Discussion Paper 96/6. Köln, Germany: Max Planck-Institut für GesellschaftsforschungGoogle Scholar
  15. Holling CS, Gunderson LH, Ludwig D (2002) In quest of a theory of adaptive change. In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS (eds) Panarchy: understanding transformation in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 1–22Google Scholar
  16. Hotimsky S, Cobb R, Bond A (2006) Contracts or scripts? A critical review of the application of institutional theories to the study of environmental change. Ecol Soc 11(1):40. On-line journal available at http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art41/ Google Scholar
  17. Inkles A, Smith DH (1974) Becoming modern: individual change in six developing countries. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  18. IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  19. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2001) Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. The Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Scientific Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Matthews R (2003) Using a social capital perspective to understand social and economic development in coastal British Columbia. Horizons: Policy Research Initiative-Government of Canada 6(3):25–29Google Scholar
  21. Matthews R, Côté R (2005) Understanding aboriginal policing in a social capital context. In: Social capital in action – thematic policy studies. Government of Canada, Policy Research Initiative, Ottawa, CA, pp 134–152Google Scholar
  22. Matthews R, Pendakur R, Young N (2009) Social capital, labour markets, and job-finding in rural and urban regions: comparing paths to employment in prosperous cities and stressed rural communities in Canada. Socio Rev 57(2):206–230Google Scholar
  23. Nee V (2001) Sources of the new institutionalism. In: Brinton MC, Nee V (eds) The new institutionalism in sociology. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  24. Nee V (2005) A new institutional approach to economic sociology. In: Smelser N, Swedberg R (eds). The Handbook of Economic Sociology 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, pp 49–74Google Scholar
  25. North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. O’Riordan T, Jordan A (1999) Institutions, climate change and cultural theory: towards a common analytical framework. Glob Environ Change 9:81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ostrom E (2005) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  28. Ostrom E, Dietz T, Dolšak N, Stern PC, Stonich S, Weber EU (eds) (2002) The drama of the commons. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  29. Page J, Enns S, Malinick T, Matthews R (2007) Should I stay or should I go? Investigating resilience in B.C’.s coastal communities. In: Tepperman L, Dickinson H (eds) Reading sociology: Canadian perspectives. Oxford University Press, Toronto, ONGoogle Scholar
  30. Pelling M, High C (2005) Understanding adaptation: what can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity? Global Environ Change 15:308–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Portes A (2006) Institutions and development: a conceptual reanalysis. Popul Dev Rev 32(2):233–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Roland G (2004) Understanding institutional change: fast moving and slow moving institutions. Stud Comp Int Dev 38:109–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smit B, Pilifosova O (2003) From adaptation to adaptive capacity and vulnerability reduction. In: Smith JB, Klein RJT, Huq S (eds) Climate change, adaptive capacity and development. Imperial College Press, London, UK, pp 9–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environ Change 16:282–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Swanson D, Hiley J, Venema HD (2007) Indicators of adaptive capacity to climate change for agriculture in the Prairie region of Canada. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), Draft Working Paper for Adaptation as Resilience Building. ON: Prairie Farm Rehabilitation Administration, Agriculture and Agri-Food CanadaGoogle Scholar
  36. Vincent K (2007) Uncertainty in adaptive capacity and the importance of scale. Global Environ Change 17:12–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland Report) (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  38. Yohe G, Tol RSJ (2002) Indicators for social and economic coping capacity – moving toward a working definition of adaptive capacity. Global Environ Change 12(1):25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Young OR, King LA, Schroeder H (2008) Institutions and environmental change: principle findings, applications and research frontiers. MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Department of SociologyThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations