Workflow for Healthcare: A Methodology for Realizing Flexible Medical Treatment Processes

  • Hajo A. Reijers
  • Nick Russell
  • Simone van der Geer
  • Gertruud A. M. Krekels
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 43)


While workflow management technology is applied in many industrial domains to improve the operational efficiency of business process execution, its usage in the healthcare domain is limited. One possible cause is that healthcare processes are often considered to be more whimsical and less predictable than procedures found in industry. Extending previous work on workflow and flexibility patterns, this paper presents a methodology for realizing processes that possess the required degree of flexibility that makes them suitable for the healthcare domain. To demonstrate the methodology’s feasibility, it is applied to the processes that are found in a Dutch outpatient clinic. Interestingly, the flexibility demands of the investigated processes match quite well with the capabilities of current workflow management technologies, further motivating their increased usage in the healthcare domain.


Workflow management technology healthcare processes flexibility patterns dermatology 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Doherty, N.F., Perry, I.: The uptake and application of workflow management systems in the UK financial services sector. Journal of Information Technology 14(2), 149–160 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu, J., Zhang, S., Hu, J.: A case study of an inter-enterprise workflow-supported supply chain management system. Information & Management 42(3), 441–454 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reijers, H.A., Poelmans, S.: Re-configuring workflow management systems to facilitate a “smooth flow of work”. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 16(2), 155–175 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Quaglini, S., Stefanelli, M., Lanzola, G., Caporusso, V., Panzarasa, S.: Flexible guideline-based patient careflow systems. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 22(1), 65–80 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lenz, R., Reichert, M.: IT support for healthcare processes–premises, challenges, perspectives. Data & Knowledge Engineering 61(1), 39–58 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Van Hee, K.M., Schonenberg, H., Serebrenik, A., Sidorova, N., van der Werf, J.M.: Adaptive Workflows for Healthcare Information Systems. In: ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Benatallah, B., Paik, H.-Y. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2007. LNCS, vol. 4928, pp. 359–370. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reijers, H.A.: Implementing BPM systems: the role of process orientation. Business Process Management Journal 12(4), 389–409 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Weber, B., Reichert, M., Rinderle-Ma, S.: Change patterns and change support features–enhancing flexibility in process-aware information systems. Data & Knowledge Engineering 66(3), 438–466 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Greiner, U., Ramsch, J., Heller, B.: Adaptive guideline-based treatment workflows with AdaptFlow. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Computerized Guidelines and Protocols (CGP 2004), pp. 113–117. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Han, M., Thiery, T., Song, X.: Managing exceptions in the medical workflow systems. In: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering, pp. 741–750. ACM, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mulyar, N., Russell, N., Van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process flexibility patterns. Working paper WP 251, Beta Research School (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Russell, N., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Van der Aalst, W.M.P., Mulyar, N.: Workflow control-flow patterns: A revised view. BPM Center Report BPM-06-22, BPM Center (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Russell, N., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Edmond, D., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Workflow data patterns: Identification, representation and tool support. In: Delcambre, L.M.L., Kop, C., Mayr, H.C., Mylopoulos, J., Pastor, Ó. (eds.) ER 2005. LNCS, vol. 3716, pp. 353–368. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Russell, N., Van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Edmond, D.: Workflow resource patterns: Identification, representation and tool support. In: Pastor, Ó., Falcão e Cunha, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3520, pp. 216–232. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schonenberg, M., Mans, R.S., Russell, N., Mulyar, N., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process flexibility: A survey of contemporary approaches. In: Dietz, J.L.G., et al. (eds.) CIAO! 2008 and EOMAS 2008. LNBIP, vol. 10, pp. 16–30. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    De Vries, E., van de Poll-Franse, L.V., Louwman, W.J., De Gruijl, F.R., Coebergh, J.W.W.: Predictions of skin cancer incidence in the Netherlands up to 2015. British Journal of Dermatology 152(3), 481 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Van der Geer, S., Reijers, H.A., Krekels, G.A.M.: How to run an effective and efficient dermato-oncology unit. Journal of the German Society of Dermatology (2009) (in press)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: YAWL: yet another workflow language. Information Systems 30(4), 245–275 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Parkes, A.: Critical success factors in workflow implementation. In: Terano, T., Myers, M.D. (eds.) Proceedings of the Sixth Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Jasmin, pp. 363–380 (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hajo A. Reijers
    • 1
  • Nick Russell
    • 1
  • Simone van der Geer
    • 2
  • Gertruud A. M. Krekels
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Industrial EngineeringEindhoven University of TechnologyThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of DermatologyErasmus Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of DermatologyCatharina Hospital EindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations