Advertisement

α− Flow: A Document-Based Approach to Inter-institutional Process Support in Healthcare

  • Christoph P. Neumann
  • Richard Lenz
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 43)

Abstract

Inter-institutional collaboration requires clean task boundaries and the separation of responsibilities. In addition, healthcare processes are intrinsically fluid. Traditional activity-oriented workflow models or content-oriented workflow models do not provide adequate support for the paper-based working practice in healthcare. The α-flow approach adopts electronic documents as the primary means of information ex-change, fusing both paradigms into a combined workflow schema model, wherein workflow schemas are represented as documents which are shared coequally to content documents.

Topics

Process modeling in healthcare workflow management in healthcare context-aware healthcare processes inter-institutional healthcare information systems document-oriented integration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Schmidt, K., Bannon, L.: Taking CSCW seriously: Supporting Articulation Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 1(1), 7–40 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Greif, I.: Computer-supported cooperative work: A book of readings. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1988)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    van Bemmel, J.H., Musen, M.A., Helder, J.C.: Handbook of medical informatics. Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    LaMarca, A., Edwards, W.K., Dourish, P., Lamping, J., Smith, I., Thornton, J.: Taking the work out of workflow: mechanisms for document-centered collaboration. In: Proc. of the 6th conference on European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 1–20. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Neumann, C.P., Rampp, F., Daum, M., Lenz, R.: A Mediated Publish-Subscribe System for Inter-Institutional Process Support in Healthcare. In: Proc of the 3rd ACM International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems (July 2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Patel, N.V.: Adaptive Evolutionary Information Systems. Idea Group Inc., USA (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lenz, R.: Information Systems in Healthcare – state and steps towards sustainability. In: Geissbuhler, A., Kulikowski, C. (eds.) IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics, Stuttgart. Schattauer (2009) (accepted for publication)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gematik. Einführung der Gesundheitskarte - Gesamtarchitektur - Version 1.5.0, Revision 2.3.4 (September 2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fraunhofer Institute for Biomedical Engineering (IBMT). PaDok – Patientenbegleitende Dokumentation (2000), http://www.ibmt.fraunhofer.de/fhg/Images/MT_padoknetzkonzept_de_tcm266-68980.pdf
  10. 10.
    ACC, HIMSS, and RSNA. IHE IT Infrastructure Technical Framework, vol. 1 (ITI TF-1): Integration Profiles, Rev 4.0 (August 2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rossi, D.: Orchestrating document-based workflows with X-Folders. In: Proc of the ACM symposium on Applied computing, pp. 503–507. ACM, NY (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dourish, P., Edwards, W.K., Howell, J., LaMarca, A., Lamping, J., Petersen, K., Salisbury, M., Terry, D., Thornton, J.: A programming model for active documents. In: Proc. of the 13th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, pp. 41–50. ACM, New York (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., Weske, M., Grünbauer, D.: Case handling: a new paradigm for business process support. Data & Knowledge Engineering 53(2), 129–162 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Künzle, V., Reichert, M.: Towards Object-Aware Process Management Systems: Issues, Challenges, Benefits. In: Halpin, T., et al. (eds.) BPMDS 2009 and EMMSAD 2009. LNBIP, vol. 29, pp. 197–210. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cohn, D., Hull, R.: Business Artifacts: A Data-centric Approach to Modeling Business Operations and Processes. Bulletin of the IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Data EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Muller, D., Reichert, M., Herbst, J.: Data-driven modeling and coordination of large process structures. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2007, Part I. LNCS, vol. 4803, pp. 131–149. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gerede, C.E., Su, J.: Specification and verification of artifact behaviors in business process models. In: Krämer, B.J., Lin, K.-J., Narasimhan, P. (eds.) ICSOC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4749, pp. 181–192. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ryndina, K., Kuster, J.M., Gall, H.: Consistency of business process models and object life cycles. In: Kühne, T. (ed.) MoDELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4364, pp. 80–90. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christoph P. Neumann
    • 1
  • Richard Lenz
    • 1
  1. 1.Friedrich-Alexander UniversityErlangen-NurembergGermany

Personalised recommendations